Is it Right to Exterminate the Jews?

Utilitarianism is the eminently sensible idea that the moral worth of an action is solely determined by its contribution to overall utility in maximizing happiness or pleasure as summed among all people. Those who favor some antiquated alternative ethical system based on rules or duties are doomed to lose, at the hands of those who don't.

It is easily proved that Jews in general have been responsible for inflicting a massive amount of suffering, misery, oppression and loss of life upon non-Jews over the past two millennia. For full details, sources, and links to further references, see A Concise History of The Jewish Problem. For example, Jewish terrorists murdered 3,000 innocent people in cold blood on September 11, 2001, and blamed it on the Muslims. (See Appendix A.)

The principal purpose of Israel's 9/11 false-flag terror attack was to serve as casus belli to have Israel's 'allies' fight its declared foes, in a series of wars aimed at benefiting Jews via regime changes that would pave the way for a Greater Israel. The wars would go on to cost the US alone thousands of dead troops and $4 to $6 trillion, without Israel paying a shekel, and without sacrificing so much as a Jewish fingernail.

At this point we should note that Jews would not be able to control the narrative were it not for their control of the mass media. They stole that idea from an 1864 book by Maurice Joly entitled The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, knowing that it was a prerequisite of their dastardly plan for world conquest. In 1896, (((Adolph Ochs))) bought The New York Times, and Jews would go on to become the dominant force in the mass media, despite being a mere 0.2% of the world population.

In the 20th century, Jews propagated a hoax about "six million" 'dead' Jews (see Appendix B). The principal purpose was to grab themselves thousands of miles of real estate in the Middle East to exploit as their own sovereign state. Early attempts to float the hoax were unsuccessful. For example, in 1919, (((Joseph Seff))) claimed that "the population of 6,000,000 souls in Ukrainia and in Poland have received notice through action and by word that they are going to be completely exterminated". In 1921, (((The New York Times))) carried a report about information by (((Dr. Joseph Kreinin))) that "Russia's 6,000,000 Jews are facing extermination by massacre". Although the tens of millions of actual dead in the wake of the first World War helped to provide a context whereby the general public might have been fooled into imagining that six million Jews had died, that was insufficient.

The hoax was only successful when the use of poison gas in disinfestation chambers could be passed off as having a sinister purpose, when Jew-run Hollywood became a major player in the motion picture industry, when Jew-backed governments were motivated to peddle atrocity propaganda to distract from their own mass murder of civilians (e.g. Dresden, Hamburg, Hiroshima, Nagasaki), when the Soviets were motivated to tamper with evidence and coerce witnesses in order to pin the blame for the Katyn massacre on the Germans as revenge for the Germans' discovery and exposure of that Soviet war crime, and when the Soviets had control of territory allowing them to deny independent observers access to the alleged extermination camps, and to construct a fake 'gas chamber' after the war.

In November 1910, Jews, in particular the banker Paul Warburg, were heavily involved in drafting the plans for America's Federal Reserve System. In December 1913, the Federal Reserve Act was signed into law. In fractional reserve banking, money can be conjured up out of thin air. The (((winners))) get the money, and the rest pay for it in inflation or higher interest rates.

In 1917 Jewish bankers funded the Jewish Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Jacob Schiff provided Trotsky with $20,000,000 in gold, and Max Warburg (Paul's brother) provided Lenin with $6,000,000. About 85% of Bolshevik leaders were Jews. Christian wealth was looted, in what has been described as "history's greatest heist", so the (((bankers))) got a good return on their investment. However, the Bolshevik Revolution and the horrific blood-letting that followed was primarily about revenge. The Khazar tribe (from which most Jews are descended, which is why most Jews are white-skinned and can fool some into thinking they're "White") was settling scores with the Russians, after the Rus' had kicked those Jews out of Khazaria, centuries previously.

In 1946, Jewish terrorists disguised themselves as Arabs and blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, killing more than 90 people. The motive was to exert additional pressure on the British to hand Palestine over to Jews.

In 1963, Jews had JFK assassinated, in what was officially deemed a killing by a "lone wolf" armed with a "magic bullet". Jews' primary motive for murdering Kennedy was that he opposed "Israel's" plans to become a nuclear-armed State. He also embarked on plans to by-pass the Jew-owned Federal Reserve System, by signing an Order to issue a new interest-free and debt-free currency backed by silver reserves. Not surprisingly, those who attempt to refute JFK assassination "conspiracy theories" tend to be Jews, with names such as Kaplan.

In 1967, "Israel" carried out a sustained, unprovoked attack on the USS Liberty, killing 34 American servicemen and wounding 172, in an attempt to sink the ship and pin the blame on the Egyptians for political gain. According to the official narrative, the sustained naval and air attack was an "accident". By this time, Jews had their stooge LBJ in the White House, who said he didn't "give a damn if every man drowns and the ship sinks"; he would not "embarrass our allies".

The list goes on and on. Jews have already been kicked out of dozens of locations on 109 occasions, after the host population got wise to their subversive, degenerate, nation-wrecking acts. Given that there is no evidence of a sea change in Jewish behavior, and no grounds for supposing that one might be imminent, we may conclude that in this case past behavior is a reliable indicator of future behavior.

Let's suppose that the average non-Jew has a happiness or life satisfaction rating of 6.0 out of 10. And similarly, we'll take the average Jewish satisfaction rating at 8.0 out of 10. They have in general a privileged status in this world, although some Jews are more privileged than others. There are approximately 7.5 billion non-Jews and 15 million Jews. At this point, the total utility is 15 million x 8/10 + 7.5 billion x 6/10 = 4,512,000,000.

Now suppose that 15 million Jews are exterminated. It is clear, from the Jewish behavior detailed above, that the 7.5 billion non-Jews would benefit considerably. Nevertheless, let us suppose that the satisfaction rating for non-Jews increases by a mere 0.1 out of 10 to 6.1 out of 10. The total utility now amounts to 7.5 billion x 6.1/10 = 4,575,000,000. Thus, exterminating the Jews has increased total utility by 63 million, and thereby has helped to maximize happiness or pleasure as summed among all people.

Let's consider the expulsion option. So we'll suppose that the 15 million Jews, no longer with a host population to parasitize and exploit, experience a reduction in happiness from 8/10 to 6.1/10, and the 7.5 billion non-Jews experience an increase from 6/10 to 6.1/10 as before. Thus, the Jews have lost their privileged status, and have been reduced to the same satisfaction rating as human beings in general. In this case, the total utility is (15 million + 7.5 billion) x 6.1/10 = 4,584,150,000. That's an increase of 72.15 million, or 9.15 million more than the increase provided by extermination.

With Jews remaining in place like a tumor, non-Jews would continue to be killed fighting wars for Israel and Jewish bankers, and so the population reduction due to excess deaths would also reduce the total utility. Thus, in both cases of extermination and expulsion, the excess utility they provide over that of the Zionist Occupied Governments (ZOGs) system would continue to grow. And apart from the fact that the assumed increase of 0.1 in non-Jewish happiness rating is much too low, if Jews are permitted to continue destroying our societies and can bring about a time "when Israel is mighty" in which they can murder or rape non-Jews with impunity, the happiness rating of non-Jews will plummet below 6/10. Thus, the total utility in the future where the Jewish problem has been solved continues to diverge from the total utility in the alternative scenario in which Jews have been granted absolute power, and the figures suggested above of a mere tens of millions or less than 2% change in utility will be a gross underestimate.

A policy of Jewish expulsions to some isolated area surrounded by a wall, for secure containment of the Jews, with the land and construction of the wall to be paid for by Jewish bankers' fortunes, would also need to include measures to ensure that Jews could never again have the power to murder and exploit non-Jews as they have been doing over the centuries. There would be HoloHoax memorial museums across the world, and a multitude of books, movies and websites to remind people of the crimes of the Jews, so that we never, ever forget. But expulsion leaves our descendants at some non-zero risk that Jews could rise up again, and so extermination has its advantages.

Those who argue that removing the Jews is wrong are forced to resort to various forms of denialism or bigotry. For example, the anti-exterminationist could argue that each Jew is worth the equivalent of more than 7,500,000,000/15,000,000/(0.8/0.01) = more than 6.25 non-Jews, given the above assumptions about happiness ratings, and therefore the exterminations would lower total utility. The anti-expulsionist could argue that each Jew is worth the equivalent of more than 500/(0.19/0.01) = more than approximately 26.3 non-Jews. And all of that greatly understates the benefits conferred to non-Jews by removing the Jews from our midst, by assuming a mere 0.1 out of 10 increase in happiness rating, and not allowing for future divergence in utility between the Jews-remaining and Jews-gone cases. In a more realistic estimate of happiness ratings, as shown in the next paragraph, the Jewish supremacist must value each Jew as equivalent to more than 500 non-Jews.

(To find the break-even value ratio - or bigotry quotient - for alternative happiness ratings in the case of expulsion, ValueJew/ValueGentile = 500(H-G)/(J-K), where H is the happiness rating of non-Jews in a world without Jews, G is the happiness rating of non-Jews in a world infested by Jews, J is the happiness rating of Jews whilst able to parasitize, and K is the happiness rating of post-exodus Jews. For the case of extermination, it simplifies to ValueJew/ValueGentile = 500(H-G)/J, since K = zero. E.g., take the case of expulsion, where the non-Jews' happiness rating increases from 6/10 to 7/10 and the Jews' happiness rating decreases from 8/10 to 7/10, so we have ValueJew/ValueGentile = 500x(0.7-0.6)/(0.8-0.7) = 500. Thus if the bigot values each Jew as worth 500 non-Jews, the initial total utility is 15 million x 500 x 0.8 + 7,500 million x 0.6 = 10.5 billion. The final total utility is 15 million x 500 x 0.7 + 7,500 million x 0.7 = 10.5 billion, as before. When the bigot values Jews as more than 500 times as valuable as non-Jews, the expulsions have the effect of lowering total utility, as perceived by the bigot. At a bigotry quotient of 501, the initial total utility is 10.512 billion and the final total utility is 10.5105 billion, a decrease of 1.5 million.)

Alternatively, the anti-exterminationist could deny the facts about Jews' murderous, subversive, destructive, terroristic actions, despite the plethora of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, and pretend that Jews are somehow the best thing since the invention of the wheel. Now there are some good Jewish actors, and even musicians, for example. However, the benefits provided by a few 'good' Jews are a mere drop in the ocean compared to the horrendous costs incurred from allowing Jews to live in a world inhabited by non-Jews. The ideal final solution, which would maximize total utility over the future whilst reducing the danger of a Zionist revival to an acceptably safe level, could combine Jewish expulsions with allowing a minority of Jews to live wherever they wanted, and have so many HoloHoax memorial museums (perhaps built on the site of the old "Holocaust museums") to document the rise and fall of Zionism, that our descendants would find it hard to imagine how a supposedly 'intelligent' species of billions could have allowed a few million con-artists to deceive them for decades.

And so, Jews such as Gerard Menuhin (who described the "Holocaust" as a "very good lie"), Paul Eisen (who said, regarding the "extermination" / "gas chambers" stories, "The trouble is, that the forensic, topographical, documentary, chemical, photographic etc. evidence, all contradict the narrative."), Gilad Atzmon (jazz artist and critic of Jewish supremacism), Yossi Gurvitz (who may be seen in a video speaking about the awful abuses of power by psychopathic Jews if we let them establish a time "when Israel is mighty"), and Mark Knopfler (of Dire Straits; excellent musician who has done nothing wrong), etc., could be given the choice of where they would like to live. On the other hand, certain Jewish 'artists' or 'artistes' such as Sarah Silverman and Lena Dunham would face compulsory expulsion, and Jewish terrorists such as Benjamin Netanyahu would have to submit themselves for trial. And even those Jews who are compulsorily repatriated should be granted safe passage to their 'new Jerusalem' and not have a hair on their heads harmed, unless of course they resist and refuse to cooperate.

In the meantime, should we murder, terrorize, beat up and persecute individual Jews, smash in their windows and spray swastikas on their walls, etc., on grounds that if ridding ourselves of all of them is hugely beneficial, then doing so on a smaller scale might be of some benefit? Absolutely not. The political benefit obtained by Jews from "anti-Semitism" is so great that they regularly phony up 'hate crimes' against themselves. Recently, Michael Ron David Kadar, a Jewish teenager with dual Israeli-American citizenship and living in Ashkelon, Israel, was found to have been responsible for more than 200 (and 2,000 by some accounts) bomb threats to Jewish institutions in America and elsewhere. After he was caught, his behavior was blamed on a "brain tumor". But that didn't stop him from establishing a thriving extortion business, with sidelines in identity theft, hacking and child porn, which has taken the equivalent of $238,000 in Bitcoin payments. There are many more cases of Jews who have been caught faking 'hate crimes' against themselves. For example, (((Sarah Marshak))) reported several swastikas appearing on her door. Upon investigation, she was found to have drawn them herself.

Jews derive their political power from their control of the mass media that allows them to shape public opinion and act as kingmakers to install puppet political 'leaders' of their choice, and from their control of the fraudulent central banking system that gives them access to vast amounts of money for purposes of bribery and other nefarious schemes. Killing or terrorising a few Jews will only enhance Jewish political power by allowing them to play their traditional role of the victim, and hence is counter-productive. It would do nothing to solve the problem. The Jewish problem can only be solved by a coordinated removal of Jews - at least, such a large majority of them that their political power has effectively been annihilated; reduced so overwhelmingly that it becomes truly commensurate with that of a tiny minority.

In conclusion, expulsion confers a small increase in total utility compared to extermination, whilst risking a large decrease in the future if it is not handled correctly. But it is clear that both expulsion and extermination offer significant gains in total utility. Failure to apply either one of these options would be foolish in the extreme, with Jewish warmongering placing the very future of mankind in jeopardy. And if the Jews get their way of bringing about a time "when Israel is mighty", the happiness ratings of their servants and playthings in a prison planet would plummet, easily offsetting the tiny gain from millions of Jews going from a happiness rating of 8/10 to nearly 10/10.

Whatever we decide, the debate is no longer about whether or not Jews should be removed from our nations. It is about whether Jews should be removed by a policy of extermination or expulsion.

Appendix A

Oded Ellner, Yaron Shmuel and Sivan Kurzberg, three of the five Israeli Jews who have been dubbed the "dancing Israelis" and the "High-Fivers", were seen high-fiving, hugging each other, flicking a lighter, grinning, and joking in celebration, at the Doric apartment block parking lot, 100 Manhattan Avenue in Union City, NJ ("Doric"), prior to the second plane crash. They were observed at Doric taking photos atop their van, before news broke of the first plane crash on the local AM news talk radio station 1010 WINS. The announcement "a plane has crashed into the World Trade Center" (WTC) was completed 4 minutes 22 seconds after the first plane impact into the North Tower. Under questioning Ellner admitted to the FBI that they chose to go to Doric because it gave them "a view of the entire length of both towers" - before the South Tower was attacked. The flat roof or adjoining warehouse roof of Urban Moving Systems of 3 W. 18th Street, Weehawken, NJ ("UMS"), to the north and slightly west of the WTC already provided a perfectly good view of the north face of the 1,368 feet-tall North Tower at the top where it had been hit. According to the Israelis, they learned about the attack - on the internet!!! - and decided to abandon their "moving" job at UMS, choosing to take their employer's van to make the drive to Doric. Even at the best of times, it is a 4- or 5-minute drive from UMS to Doric. The rush hour on a Tuesday morning is hardly the best of times for road travel.

After the Israelis were arrested on the afternoon of the attacks, they were found to be in possession of airline tickets to leave the US from JFK International Airport, New York City on September 12, 2001, on Olympic Airways Flight  412 at 17:45 bound for Athens, Greece, whereupon they would catch a second flight to arrive in Tel Aviv, Israel on the morning of September 14. They had booked those tickets via the Issta Lines travel group in June 2001, which is when they entered the US from Tel Aviv, Israel via Athens. Upon returning safely to Israel after their heavily lobbied for release, Ellner would go on to admit on a national talk show that their purpose was to "document the event". Benjamin Netanyahu, who 'predicted' in his 1995 book Fighting Terrorism that terrorists would bring down the WTC, is a close friend of (((Larry Silverstein))), who secured 12-layer, 22-company insurance to cover the WTC buildings against terrorist attacks aggregating $3,546,809,904 "per occurrence", and including property damage and business interruption, less than six weeks before the buildings were destroyed in two "occurrences" of terrorist attacks. Like Netanyahu, the Flight 11 so-called "passenger" (((Daniel Lewin))) was a Captain in Israel's elite special forces unit Sayeret Matkal, was educated at MIT, and lived in Denver and Jerusalem. Thus, the chances of the two not knowing each other is vanishingly small.

Appendix B

The recorded coke deliveries to Auschwitz-Birkenau total 1,037 tons, documented on approximately 240 delivery notes dating from 16th February 1942 to 25th October 1943, with the data for February 1942 to March 1943 being corroborated by calculations from 'Nazi' civilian engineer Rudolf Jährling. A generous extrapolation of 2,000 tons of coke for 1942-1944, divided by more than a million allegedly "gassed", obtains a figure of less than 2 kg of coke per corpse required by the Holocaust narrative, which is physically and scientifically impossible, as proved by the fact that modern animal cremators and incinerators can get nowhere near that performance, and that the Germans are known to have required 30.6 to 47.9 kg of coke per corpse for running the Topf double-muffle oven at Gusen, depending on whether the cremations were continuous or semi-continuous respectively.

We know from the ~2,000 tons of coke delivered to Auschwitz-Birkenau, divided by 30.6 kg of coke per corpse, that not much more than 65,000 bodies were cremated in the Topf ovens of Auschwitz-Birkenau. 100,000 is an absolute maximum if we suppose, very optimistically, that the triple-muffle could get down to 20 kg of coke per corpse. This is entirely consistent with the upper limit of 108,000 that could have been cremated in the ovens based on the firebrick durability. However, 65,000 to 70,000 is a far better estimate for the total cremated in ovens.

From cross-referencing the Auschwitz death books with coke consumption in the period February 1942 to February 1943 before the Birkenau ovens came into operation, it can be seen that some 30,000 to 35,000 bodies were independently cremated in pits (fueled by wood) when the three double-muffle ovens of Auschwitz I were wholly unable to cope with the load, especially during the terrible typhus epidemic that peaked in August 1942 and prompted commissioning of the additional crematoria capacity at Birkenau. The Auschwitz death books record 68,864 dead, of whom 29,125 were Jews and 31,814 were Roman Catholics. That's up to the end of 1943, so the figure is ~100,000 when 1944 is factored in as well. And that figure of ~100,000 is in good agreement with the ~100,000 obtained from adding the total cremated in ovens to the total cremated in pits.

The average cyanide concentration found in the alleged "gas chambers" was 1.827 mg/kg from 22 samples, compared to an average level of 4,724 mg/kg for the delousing chambers. That's excluding a pseudo-scientific 'study' by biased government-sponsored researchers (Markiewicz et al), who tampered with the methodology in order to fix the results. Thus, on average, the delousing chambers have cyanide concentrations 2,586 times higher than those in the so-called "gas chambers". The highest delousing chamber concentration and the highest "gas chamber" concentration exhibit a similar ratio, at 1,875 : 1. Given the fact that another factor of more than ten can be included to allow for conditions in the alleged "gas chambers" (the morgues) being more conducive to formation of Iron Blue, it would have been preposterous for the Germans to have used 99.99% of their Zyklon B to save their prisoners' lives at the same time that they were using the remaining 0.01% to murder them.

The official narrative for other alleged "death camps" such as Treblinka is just as absurd. For example, it would not have been possible for the 25 Jewish woodcutters to chop, saw and gather the required 261,000 tons of green (wet) wood to cremate 870,000 bodies within seven months, since they would need to have been working at 88 times the productivity rate of 0.555 tons of wood per day per woodcutter that well-fed and well-equipped Italian woodcutters are known to have achieved in peacetime. Had they been able to match the Italians' rates, the Jewish woodcutters would have to have continued working until September 1994. Similarly, the idea that 2,955 Einsatgruppen could somehow murder between one and three million Jews, after identifying and selecting them from an enemy population in excess of 100 million, is ridiculous enough on its face. But the notion that the Einsatzgruppen could somehow dispose of all "the evidence" by cremating all the bodies in the open-air, whilst remaining invisible to Soviet aircrew, requires either that at least 1034 supernatural, sentient, sapient "anti-Semitic" photons were part of a cover-up 'plot', colluding together to adjust their energies as required to make it appear like the events never happened, or that the Soviets sent up blind pilots, blind crew, and non-functioning cameras.

Take Our World Back!