Theresa "Canute" May's Four-Point Plan To Defeat Islamist Terror

This refers to Theresa May's speech from Downing Street of June 4, 2017, hours after the third of three terrorist attacks in the UK between March 22 and June 3 of 2017, in which 34 people were killed and injuries are well into treble figures. We shall compare May's lily-livered defence of "multiculturalism" with the reality.

Theresa May: Last night, our country fell victim to a brutal terrorist attack, once again.

Yes, it was the third terrorist attack in eleven weeks. And the responsibility for that lies with Theresa May and all of those before her who have pursued policies of mass immigration, "multiculturalism" and "diversity".

There are nearly 3,500 potential terrorists in the UK who are being monitored by the security services. But there are at least another 20,000 who are "subjects of interest". These are also potential terrorists, as evidenced by the fact that the Manchester bomber Salman Abedi - who murdered 22 people - was one of those "subjects of interest" who appeared on the radar of counter-intelligence agencies.

The idea that you can somehow monitor or even control the internet in an attempt to solve the problem, whilst continuing to import even more Muslims into a country, is akin to building a house of sand on the beach, and having thousands of men run around with buckets in a forlorn attempt to stop the tide.

TM: As a result I have just chaired a meeting of the government's emergency committee, and I want to update you with the latest information about the attack.

TM: Shortly before ten past ten yesterday evening, the Metropolitan Police received reports that a white van had struck pedestrians on London Bridge. It continued to drive from London Bridge to Borough Market, where three terrorists left the van and attacked innocent and unarmed civilians with blades and knives.

Many similar attacks have taken place elsewhere, such as France, Germany, and in other countries.

TM: All three were wearing what appeared to be explosive vests, but the police have established that this clothing was fake, and worn only to spread panic and fear.

TM: As so often in such serious situations, the police responded with great courage and great speed. Armed officers from the Metropolitan Police and the City of London Police arrived at Borough Market within moments, and shot and killed the three suspects. The terrorists were confronted and shot by armed officers within eight minutes of the police receiving the first emergency call.

The police should not have to deal with such situations, because the incidents should not be allowed to happen in the first place. The way to stop such incidents from happening is to (i) Stop all immigration of non-Whites, and (ii) Send Muslims and Jews back to their places of ethnic origin (we'll explain about the Jews in a moment), and (iii) Quit meddling in other people's countries.

Is it "xenophobic" to want to prevent squatters from coming into your home and taking it over? If not, then why should it be "xenophobic" to want to prevent low-IQ dark-skinned savages and high-IQ light-skinned, lying, deceiving, murderous leeches from entering and wrecking your own racial homeland, subjecting your people to White genocide via a deliberately engineered policy of mongrelisation of Whites through miscegenation and mass immigration, which ensures that within decades your people will become a persecuted and despised minority in their own land, by which time you will have squandered and thrown away the precious homeland bequeathed to you by your ancestors?

TM: Seven people have died as a result of the attack, in addition to the three suspects shot dead by the police. Forty-eight people are being treated in several hospitals across London. Many have life-threatening conditions.

And this is part of the price we must pay for the 'benefits' of "diversity" and "multiculturalism"? What 'benefits'? Depression of wages? A jobs shortage in the low-skilled or unskilled sectors? An NHS that can't cope with the load? The necessity for schools to teach pupils in more than 300 different languages? Curry houses where the chef prepares food after going to the toilet, but doesn't use toilet paper for "cultural reasons"? Traffic congestion and a shortage of parking spaces? Rubbish that's collected only fortnightly or even monthly?

TM: On behalf of the people of London and on behalf of the whole country, I want to thank and pay tribute to the professionalism and bravery of the police and the emergency services, and the courage of members of the public who defended themselves and others from the attackers. And our thoughts and prayers are with the victims, and with their friends, families and loved ones.

TM: This is, as we all know, the third terrorist attack Britain has experienced in the last three months. In March a similar attack took place just around the corner on Westminster Bridge.

TM: Two weeks ago the Manchester Arena was attacked by a suicide bomber, and now London has been struck once more. And at the same time, the security and intelligence agencies and police have disrupted five credible plots since the Westminster attack in March.

There is a simple solution that will work exceedingly well. Get these 'people' out of our country, and don't let any more of them in!

TM: In terms of their planning and execution, the recent attacks are not connected, but we believe we are experiencing a new trend in the threat we face. As terrorism breeds terrorism and perpetrators are inspired to attack, not only on the basis of carefully constructed plots after years of planning and training, and not even as lone attackers radicalised online, but by copying one another and often using the crudest of means of attack.

True, there is a new trend. Up until about 2006, Jews were having to frame Muslims for terror attacks, or the government would accuse Muslims of some preposterous, made up 'plot'. For example, the Forest Gate raid of 2006 involved 250 police who smashed their way into a house in the middle of the night and arrested two brothers after shooting one of them in the shoulder. It was based on intelligence from a "reliable", single source. Allegedly, there was a conspiracy involving a "cyanide bomb". Several days later, the brothers were released without charge. It was subsequently revealed that the source was a man with an IQ of 69 who was already in jail on a terror conviction.

The Wood Green "ricin plot" was another Government hoax; there never was any ricin, and the "plotters" were found not guilty of conspiracy to poison London with ricin.

However, the war on Afghanistan was launched in 2001 and the war on Iraq was launched in 2003. After it became evident that these wars had been waged on a false prospectus, motivated by the fact that both the Taliban and Saddam Hussein were regimes that refused to sell out their citizens to Jewish bankers, some Muslims understandably become enraged at the unprovoked, illegal, illegitimate attacks on their nations, and the devastation wreaked upon their lands. From that point on, there was a very real problem with Islamist terror, and no longer any need for Zionist false-flag terror to incriminate the Muslims. The incidents, however, would tend to involve rather crude plots such as improvised explosive devices, stabbings, beheadings, running over with vehicles, etc., since Islamist terrorists simply haven't the capability to murder 3,000 people and bring down three skyscrapers and part of the Pentagon.

On the other hand, the Israeli State and the Mossad has a very sophisticated capacity to orchestrate terror, as in the case of the 9/11 attacks of 2001 or the London 7/7 attacks of 2005. Jews have such a reputation and long history of perpetrating false-flag terror and blaming it on the Muslims for political gain, that a September 10, 2001 Washington Times report noted that the Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS) had the following to say about the Mossad: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act".

It is no coincidence that Israeli Jews were seen atop their van celebrating with high-fives and hugging each other at the Doric apartment block parking lot at 100 Manhattan Avenue, Union City, New Jersey, immediately after the first plane crash, and before the news had broken on the local AM news station 1010 WINS, 4 minutes 22 seconds after the first impact. After their arrest on the afternoon of the attacks, the Israelis were found to be in possession of evidence "linking" them to the attacks, some of which needed to be classified. Some of the evidence included airline tickets to leave the US from JFK International Airport, New York City on September 12, 2001, on Olympic Airways Flight 412 at 17:45 bound for Athens, Greece, whereupon they would catch a second flight to arrive in Tel Aviv, Israel on the morning of September 14. They had booked those tickets with the September 12 date via the Issta Lines travel group in June 2001, which is when they entered the US from Tel Aviv via Athens. And of 76 photos taken by those Israelis in the minutes between the first and second plane crashes, they were found to appear "visibly happy on nearly all" 76 of them.

It is no coincidence that Benjamin Netanyahu, who was in London on the morning of the 7/7 attacks and had advance knowledge, was a close friend of Larry Silverstein, who insured the WTC buildings against terrorist attacks aggregating $3,546,809,904 "per occurrence", and including property damage and business interruption, within six weeks of the buildings being destroyed in two "occurrences" of terrorist attacks. It is no coincidence that Silverstein failed to turn up for his regular daily breakfast at the Windows on the World restaurant on the 106th and 107th floors of the North Tower on the morning of 9/11/01, due to a "dermatologist's appointment". Similarly, his two children Roger and Lisa were spared a ghastly fate after uncharacteristically failing to turn up for work that day, because they were "running late".

It is no coincidence that, just like Netanyahu, the Flight 11 so-called "passenger" Daniel Lewin was a Captain in Israel's elite special forces unit Sayeret Matkal, was educated at MIT, and lived in Denver and Jerusalem. The chances of the two not being acquainted is vanishingly small.

It is no coincidence that Flight 11 targeted WTC1 at a roll angle of 25° so that its impact zone spanned the five floors 94-98, and that those floors were not only at the centre of the contiguous floors 92-100 that had upgraded fireproofing (SFRM), but also had SFRM with different measured characteristics - a higher density, cohesion and sprayed thickness - compared to the other upgraded SFRM, consistent with embedded accelerants to change it from steel-protecting to steel-weakening in the event of office fires. It is no coincidence that Netanyahu's BSc in architecture from MIT, together with access to blueprints of the WTC - either from his close friend Larry Silverstein, who built the original WTC7 in 1987, or from Lewis M. Eisenberg, the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) who oversaw the privatization of the WTC, enabled him to calculate that taking out five contiguous floors of a WTC tower by causing failure of floor trusses would raise the slenderness ratio of enough core columns above the critical slenderness ratio, such that Euler buckling of core columns, bowing of perimeter columns, and global collapse of the tower would ensue.

It is no coincidence that Benjamin Netanyahu 'predicted' in his 1995 book Fighting Terrorism that terrorists would bring down the WTC; he spent ten years ensuring that terrorists did bring down the WTC!

It is no coincidence that Rabbi Dov Zakheim was CEO of SPC International, a company that produced "Flight Termination Systems" capable of electronically hijacking aircraft and steering them by remote control via a Command Transmitter System into tall buildings - or relatively short buildings like the Pentagon - at a range of hundreds of miles. It is no coincidence that Zakheim was sworn in as Pentagon Comptroller on May 4, 2001, months before a plane smashed into the Pentagon's accounts section, destroying documents and outdated standalone accounting computer systems, and killing accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts, after Zakheim had had the power to hire and fire those who did the data backups. This occurred after the March 2000 public announcement that the Pentagon's finances were "in disarray" and almost $7 trillion of bookkeeping adjustments had been required in order to balance the accounts, with $2.3 trillion of those corrections lacking receipts. It is no coincidence that Zakheim was a co-signatory to the 2000 PNAC paper Rebuilding America's Defenses, which wrote of the 'benefits' of a "new Pearl Harbor".

It is no coincidence that Bernard Kerik went on a four-day trip to Israel from August 26-29, 2001, two weeks in advance of 9/11, where he met with Israeli billionaire Eitan Wertheimer, who is "friends with prime ministers". In the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, there were multiple, credible reports of an Israeli van with "tons" of explosives that could have done great damage to the George Washington Bridge. Yet Kerik claimed "there was no explosives in the van". Kerik also announced the "discovery" of a "hijacker's" passport that was handed in by a mysterious stranger who immediately ran off and was never seen nor heard from again. The passport was said to have been "soaked in jet fuel", yet survived the fireball and was found in pristine condition.

Years later, Kerik was convicted of lying, conspiracy and fraud, and sent to jail. It was revealed that he'd received a $250,000 "loan" from Wertheimer via Brooklyn marble and stone merchant Shimon Cohen who served as intermediary in the transaction, had rent payments to the value of more than $236,000 paid between 2001 and 2003 by Steven C. Witkoff, a Jewish New York real estate developer with business links and other associations with Israel, and received a $28,000 "loan" from Nathan Berman, a prominent Jewish local real estate developer and former art dealer who'd immigrated from the Ukraine in 1973.

In 2000 there was no Muslim problem; there was only a Jewish problem. And a very serious Jewish problem at that. It could have been solved by removing the Jews from our lands, followed by voluntary repatriation or sterilisation of other non-White ethnicities. Now in 2017, thanks to the Jews, the Muslims will need to be dealt with by sending them back to Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Libya and so on. It's not as if there is a shortage of countries for them to go to. If we delay implementing a solution for too much longer, it may be too late to avoid Armageddon.

TM: We cannot and must not pretend that things can continue as they are. Things need to change, and they need to change in four important ways.

Yes, things need to change. And as mentioned above, they need to change by changing our traitorous, anti-White, pro-Jew regimes for pro-White patriotic governments, who truly represent the Whites who are the real owners of the British land.

It started with the traitor Oliver Cromwell, who let the Jews back into England after they'd quite correctly been expelled by King Edward I. It is the Jews, funded and orchestrated by the likes of billionaire George Soros, who have been foisting mass immigration and "multiculturalism" upon White homelands as part of the Jewish program for world conquest.

In a 2010 interview with Israeli IBA News, the vile Jewish supremacist Barbara Lerner Spectre openly admitted that Jews were the driving force "at the center" of the "transformation". And in characteristic fashion for a Jewish supremacist, Spectre blames "anti-Semitism" for the fact that not every White person supports the ongoing White genocide, and not every White person is prepared to meekly accept this preposterous program that the Jews seek to impose upon us.

Spectre said, "I think there's a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time, Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we [Jews] are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It's a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role."

Yet Jews don't want to enjoy the 'delights' of a "multicultural mode" - rape, bombings, stabbings, trucks mowing down crowds, and dilution of their racial stock through miscegenation, etc. - in their own ill-gotten Zionist State of Israel. They operate a closed border policy, even going so far as to build a wall. Israel is officially "not an immigration country".

Jews aim to rule the world from a Greater Israel, whilst turning the rest of the world into a gigantic prison - a borderless cesspit of mixed-race mongrels who would be smart enough to toil for the Jews but not smart enough to stand in the way of Jewish supremacy.

For decades, the Zionist Occupied Governments (ZOGs) of Britain and other nations have been pursuing anti-White, pro-Zionist policies that are aimed at exterminating the Jews' only serious rival, by replacing the White population in White homelands with dark-skinned barbarians, by encouraging miscegenation (race-mixing), and by stirring up trouble with wars and destabilization of Islamist countries.

The series of regime changes that were launched in the wake of the Jews' 9/11 false-flag terror attacks of 2001 had three main purposes: (i) To replace patriotic leaders with puppets who would sell out their people to Jewish bankers, in preparation for the time when a Greater Israel would span from the Nile to the Euphrates, and (ii) To cause a flood of refugees and opportunistic migrants who would be admitted into White nations via ZOGs' open-border policies, and (iii) To foment anti-White hatred amongst some Muslims that would lead to terrorist acts against White nations, in the hope that this would make the public more sympathetic to Israel, which is subjected to a small amount of terrorism as a result of its occupation of Palestinian land and oppression of the Palestinians.

TM: First, while the recent attacks are not connected by common networks, they are connected in one important sense. They are bound together by the single, evil ideology of Islamist extremism that preaches hatred, sows division, and promotes sectarianism. It is an ideology that claims our western values of freedom, democracy and human rights are incompatible with the religion of Islam. It is an ideology that is a perversion of Islam, and a perversion of the truth.

Here is what May should have said, if she had wanted to tell the truth:

"First, while the recent attacks are not connected by common networks, they are connected in one important sense. They are bound together by the single, evil ideology of Jewish Talmudic supremacism that preaches anti-White hatred (e.g., by perpetuating decades-old anti-German wartime atrocity propaganda about fictitious "gas chambers"), sows division (e.g., by provoking a clash of civilizations, between ZOG and Islamist nations) and promotes sectarianism (e.g., by stirring up trouble between Sunni and Shi'ite Muslims). It is an ideology that privately accepts the fact that Zionist values of freedom, democracy and human rights are incompatible with the religion of Islam, whilst publicly promoting "multiculturalism" and pretending that the two very different value systems are compatible. It is an ideology that is a perversion of monotheistic religion, and a perversion of the truth."

TM: Defeating this ideology is one of the great challenges of our time, but it cannot be defeated through military intervention alone. It will not be defeated through the maintenance of a permanent, defensive counter-terrorism operation, however skilful its leaders and practitioners. It will only be defeated when we turn people's minds away from this violence, and make them understand that our values, pluralistic British values, are superior to anything offered by the preachers and supporters of hate.

Again, here is what May should have said:

"Defeating this ideology of Jewish Talmudic supremacism is one of the great challenges of our time, but it cannot be defeated through military intervention alone. It will not be defeated through the maintenance of a permanent, defensive counter-terrorism operation, however skilful its leaders and practitioners. It will only be defeated when we remove the Jews from White societies, and reject the pluralistic Rothschildian values offered by the Jewish preachers and supporters of anti-White hate."

TM: Second, we cannot allow this ideology the safe space it needs to breed. Yet that is precisely what the internet, and the big companies that provide internet-based services, provide. We need to work with allied democratic governments, to reach international agreements that regulate cyberspace, to prevent the spread of extremist and terrorism planning. And we need to do everything we can at home to reduce the risks of extremism online.

May and her Jewish friends - to whom she spoke at the Finchley United Synagogue in April 2015, praising the Jewish terrorists who murdered British servicemen and blew up the King David Hotel in their bid to illegally seize Palestine - would love to be able to shut down free speech on the internet. Unfortunately for them, the internet cannot be controlled, and it is because of that fact that people are becoming aware of Jewish atrocities, lies and deceptions such as their hoax abut "six million" 'dead' Jews, which they fabricated in the 1890s and finally managed to peddle to a critical mass of people fifty years later in the wake of a second world war, when morgues and delousing chambers used to save human lives by exterminating typhus lice could be passed off as homicidal "gas chambers", and corpses of unknown nationality who died of natural deaths from typhus and other illnesses in wartime could be passed off as "gassed" "Jews".

For anyone who is still labouring under the illusion that Jews were "gassed" in World War Two, see our refutations here, here or here. More people died in the back of Ted Kennedy's car at Chappaquiddick than were ever killed in "gas chambers" during WWII.

The problem of White homelands being turned into a giant melting pot to accommodate people of all races, cultures, religions and IQ levels, with the various races being taken from their homelands and forced to live together in an unnatural state, can be blamed squarely and fairly on the Jews. If the traitor Cromwell and others of his ilk had never readmitted the Jews to England, the problem would not have arisen. If Maurice Joly had not written his 1864 book The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu setting out a program for world conquest, the most important of which was taking over the press, 'French' Jews would not have been able to plagiarize it in 1889 and steal the ideas for themselves. If the traitors Churchill and Roosevelt had been aborted, then Adolf Hitler, the world's greatest leader for 650 years, might have defeated the Jewish menace, so that the early 1940s did not become the start of a new Dark Ages for mankind. If the treasonous pedophile Ted Heath, protégé of fervent Europhile Jew Madron Seligman, had never been born, and the nation-wrecking Jews had not already taken control of the press so that they could push for mass immigration, then Enoch Powell might have prevailed to become Conservative leader, and Britain would have been spared 47 wasted years in the "Common Market" / European Union. If the Jews hadn't already taken control of the mass media by 2001, then they would never have been able to pull off their 9/11 false-flag without everyone becoming aware of the true identity of the perpetrators, and there would have been no pretext for the series of wars and foreign interventions that paved the way for the creation of ISIS, and for angering so many Muslims that they became a very real terrorist threat after 2006, following 2001 when they had been no threat at all.

So now May is proposing that we continue with the problems posed by "multiculturalism" and mass immigration, and try to counter them with attempts to control free speech, and attempts to have the security services keep monitoring tens of thousands of potential terrorists, and having the police respond to terrorist attacks as quickly as possible, and for people to just learn to live with the fact that they might be blown up with nail bombs, mowed down by a truck or car, or stabbed, because it's a price worth paying for the 'benefits' of "multiculturalism".

The internet isn't the only means of communication. Does May propose that we bulldoze all mosques so that they cannot be used to breed extremism? Does she propose banning telephones because they could be used for radicalising individuals and planning terror? Does she intend to remove everyone's vocal cords so that preachers of hate and extremism cannot brainwash susceptible individuals? Does she want to chop off everyone's hands so that after individuals are rendered mute they cannot be persuaded to become suicidal jihadists by a series of written communications? Anyone who wished to live in such a society might as well move to an Islamic state.

May's 'solution' is sheer lunacy, comparable to a cancer surgeon who refuses to remove a tumour on grounds that it's wrong to discriminate against tumours because they're all part of the animal kingdom, and who proposes that the patient is instead continually monitored, in a doomed attempt to catch 23,000 rogue cells generated by the tumour before they can do serious damage.

TM: Third, while we need to deprive the extremists of their safe spaces online, we must not forget about the safe spaces that continue to exist in the real world. Yes, that means taking military action to destroy ISIS in Iraq and Syria, but it also means taking action here at home. While we have made significant progress in recent years, there is to be frank far too much tolerance to extremism in our country. So we need to become far more robust in identifying it and stamping it out, across the public sector, and across society. That will require some difficult and often embarrassing conversations. But the whole of our country needs to come together to take on this extremism, and we need to live our lives not in a series of separated, segregated communities, but as one truly united kingdom.

And the best way to restore Britain to the truly united kingdom that it should be is to compulsorily remove the Jews and the Muslims, and to offer voluntary repatriation to the other races, whilst ensuring that all future British governments pursue pro-White policies that protect and benefit the descendants of those who originally tamed this land, and guarantee that Whites will not become a despised, persecuted minority in their own land who are hunted down and killed for sport.

TM: Fourth, we have a robust counter-terrorism strategy that has proved successful over many years. But as the nature of the threat we face becomes more complex, more fragmented, more hidden, especially online, the strategy needs to keep up. So in light of what we are learning about the changing threat, we need to review Britain's counter-terrorism strategy, to make sure the police and security services have all the powers they need. And if we need to increase the length of custodial sentences for terrorism-related offences, even apparently less serious offences, that is what we will do.

The police and security services should be given the powers to deal with the threat from brown or black-skinned people, who, like the Jews, do not belong in Britain in the first place. And they should also be able to deal with White traitors who have betrayed their own kith and kin by embracing Islamist fanaticism. What they shouldn't have to do is to go after politically incorrect White dissidents who are sick and tired of White exploitation and White genocide, and who for example have merely posted images mocking a Jewish M.P., or have posted a song mocking "Holocaust" survivors who claim to have swallowed and excreted diamonds hundreds of times.

TM: Since the emergence of the threat from Islamist-inspired terrorism, our country has made significant progress in disrupting plots and protecting the public. But it is time to say enough is enough. Everybody needs to go about their lives as they normally would. Our society should continue to function in accordance with our values, but when it comes to taking on extremism and terrorism, things need to change.

Enough is enough. It's time to solve the problem. But our values should be White values, not the "multicultural" values of the hypocritical Jews who only wish to impose "diversity" upon their competitors whilst ensuring that they never engage in such stupidity in their ill-gotten Zionist State of "Israel".

TM: As a mark of respect, two political parties have suspended our national campaigns for today. But violence can never be allowed to disrupt the democratic process. So those campaigns will resume in full tomorrow, and the General Election will go ahead as planned on Thursday. As a country, our response must be as it has always been when we have been confronted by violence. We must come together, we must pull together, and united, we will take on and defeat our enemies.

We must defeat the Jewish supremacists who are our true enemies. And it is not "anti-Semitic" to say so, since most Semites are not Jews, and most Jews are not Semites, as was proved by Jewish Israeli-born molecular geneticist Eran Elhaik, in a 2012 paper published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Take Our World Back!