David Cameron's Thought Police Proposals Dissected


This refers to the Monday, July 20, 2015 speech by British prime minister David Cameron; the transcript is sourced from here. We shall dissect Cameron's claims, and see how they hold up against reality.

David Cameron: [...] I said on the steps of Downing Street that this would be a ‘one nation’ government, bringing our country together. Today, I want to talk about a vital element of that. How together we defeat extremism and at the same time build a stronger, more cohesive society.

Reality: For the newcomer, the first thing to understand is what extremism is, and what it isn't. In the inverted 'reality' of Cameron-speak, truth is lies and lies are truth. And to Cameron, anything that challenges the extremist future he and his masters have planned for the world is defined as "extremism". As we shall demonstrate, the leaders of the Western so-called "democracies" are merely mouthpieces for an ugly group of racial supremacists and religious bigots whose dream is to sleepwalk the populace into a global fascist dictatorship, in which those racist fanatics are the despots who enjoy all the trappings of success and can kill, rape and plunder with impunity. The fanatics are from the same group that owns and controls the mass media, since that gives them the power to promote or sideline candidates for the leadership of the major political parties. Thus, they get their puppet elected, and then it's payback time. When the piper helps to finance someone's career, the protégé will dance to the piper's tune. This doesn't mean that the fanatics enjoy as much control as if the despotism was already established, but they do have massive political clout, and can have countries go to war on a false prospectus, for example. Such wars provide no benefit for, and prove costly for, the populace - some return in body bags, others are horrifically injured, and insane amounts of money are wasted. For example, $4 trillion to $6 trillion was expended by the US alone on a "war on terror" that would go on to injure 1 million US veterans including nearly 270,000 brain injuries (thankfully, mostly minor), and killing nearly 7,000 of them. Far from stopping terrorism, it actively encouraged it! But there certainly is a group that benefits from these wars - the fanatics who hope to take over the world with their divide and conquer strategy, and the aid of their "democratically" elected puppet 'leaders'.

In Britain for example, the suitably psychopathic and career-oriented Tony Blair was introduced to the Jewish businessman Lord (Michael) Levy in 1994 at a dinner in the Israeli Embassy, and the rest is history. The inescapable conclusion is that Levy agreed to do all he could to get Blair elected, provided Blair agreed never to act against Israeli interests whilst he was leader. The Zionist [q.v. Zionism, below] Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation strongly supported Blair, whose closest ally Peter Mandelson, of Jewish descent, was at the heart of the "New Labour" project. Mandelson had originally backed Gordon Brown to become party leader, but switched his support to Tony Blair, who went on to win the 1997 election with the biggest majority held by any government since 1935. Blair had such a close relationship with the Zionist press that Murdoch divorced his third wife Wendi Deng, after Blair had been secretly meeting her around the world and Deng had written a secret note praising Blair's "good body", "good legs" and various other attributes. Blair is a classic example of a Zionist puppet, as every time he opens his mouth, you may be sure his rants are simply Zionist lies and propaganda that are almost the polar opposite to the truth. A former friend described him as a "narcissist" with a "Messiah complex" who is "quite disconnected from reality". The friend suggests Blair went mad as a result of his time in office. That's certainly how it would appear, and he could be right. Blair's mentors and paymasters had fed him such a massive web of lies to regurgitate that the only remaining question is, does he still understand that he is lying for profit, or have the lies become, for him, 'reality'?

Zionism, billed as providing a homeland for the Jewish people, is essentially the fanatics' program to take over the world by taking control of the mass media and having their puppet presidents and prime ministers do their bidding. Although Jewish supremacists and bigots had a long-standing dream of creating a Jewish 'paradise' by fulfilling an Isaianic prophecy about the Gentiles serving the Jews and the fortunes of the nations passing over to the Jews, it was around 1890 with the advent of the Zionist project that the dream crystallized into a detailed program, after Jews plagiarized ideas from an 1864 book by Maurice Joly - The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu. Zionism was subdivided into political Zionism, which was the overt plan to establish a Jewish homeland, and secret Zionism, which was the covert plan to set up puppet political 'leaders' as the figureheads to represent the Machiavellian "democracies", best described as Zionist Occupied Governments [ZOGs]. Once this global crime syndicate had its own sovereign state, it could be used to exert additional political leverage, and as a sanctuary for swindlers. Many of the fanatics' puppets in governments and the media are either not Jewish, or do not openly admit to any Jewish heritage, but they are Zionist through and through. For example, Rupert Murdoch is a long-time friend of Benjamin Netanyahu, a long-time friend of Jacob Rothschild (ever since Murdoch came to Britain in the Sixties, when Rothschild helped Murdoch buy the News of the World), had a Jew (Peter Chernin) as his second-in-command for many years, and has consistently served as an outlet for pro-Jewish, pro-Zionist, pro-Israel views.

In 2005, David Davis was initially the popular favorite to win the leadership contest for the opposition Conservative party. However, Davis was a relatively rare type of politician who regarded principles such as serving the public and the defense of liberty as more important than career, whereas David Cameron, the great-great-great-great-great-grandson of King William IV, the fifth cousin twice-removed of Queen Elizabeth II, and the great-great-grandson of Emile Levita from a Jewish family, could be relied upon to represent the powers-that-be rather than the electorate. After the Zionist press touted how brilliant Cameron supposedly was, he was elected opposition leader, and then prime minister.

As for the US, George "Dubya" Bush, a "dry drunk", was not even capable of swallowing a pretzel, had several mishaps with bicycles, and even managed to drop his dog. As a child, he loved blowing up frogs. The Bush Administration was riddled with Jews, who are 2.2% of the US population. Obama has also had plenty of Jewish advisors. He thinks that Hawaii is in Asia, America is "the country that built the Intercontinental Railroad", and if his teleprompter is a minute late when he's starting a speech, he says "Just waiting, here", followed by a minute of unexplained, embarrassing silence. According to The Times of Israel, "Far more than any previous president, Obama spent his adulthood in the company of Jews. His most important professional mentors were Jews; most of his big donors were Jews; many of his neighbors were Jews; his chief political consultant was a Jew. As [Rabbi Arnold Jacob] Wolf himself would later say, Obama was 'embedded in the Jewish world'."

This is how the system works in a Rothschildian "democracy". It's not what they know, but who they know, and it's why voters are lumbered with a never-ending barrage of mediocrity, incompetence, warmongering, narcissism and even psychopathy. The Jews themselves love to remind everyone about all the "Jews In The American Media". The situation is the same in Britain, for example, where the Jews admit they were already "a major factor in British journalism" by the middle of the 19th century. Time and again, the Jewish press will excitedly proclaim how great some president or prime minister is, how clever they are at understanding policy, how they're in touch with the ordinary people, etc. That's just before, or just after, they've been elected. You can bet it won't be long before the "honeymoon period" is over, the 'leader' totally ignores the wishes of most of the people, and instead takes the policy that best serves the shadow government - such as declaring war against Iraq.

It must be stressed at this point that the vast majority of Jews, even those who support Zionism, are not part of the conspiracy. Most are simply duped into imagining that everyone hates them and they need their Zionist leaders to 'protect' them. In Israel, the Zionist regime guarantees terror attacks against Jews with its anti-peace policies. Elsewhere, the Zionist conspirators need to take other measures to try to perpetuate the myth that everyone hates Jews, in case people notice that Jews are less safe in Israel and start to suspect that Zionism might be the problem. So the Zionists have sayanim fake phony "hate crimes" against themselves, such as vandalising their own cars or graves, or poisoning their dogs and defacing their houses with swastikas, or cutting their clothes and drawing swastikas on their stomachs. The last thing Zionists want is a peaceful world in which the good people of all races and religions unite against the criminals, warmongers and terrorists.

Jewish racists and religious bigots see themselves as the 'master race' and the Chosen people, and in their arrogance they imagine they are destined to rule over the rest of us from a world government based in Jerusalem, led by a descendant of King David. Their Utopian dream is described by Michael Higger in his book The Jewish Utopia. All people are to be "taught of the Lord", and "education" will "furnish masses of capable and energetic citizens for the new Universal State" (p. 104), i.e., they want Gentiles to be brainwashed dupes who live to serve the Jews. "The Davidic ruler, to be recognized universally, will be the perfect ethical character. [...] Jerusalem will become the new capital of the idea Universal State" (p. 114), and "... when the rabbis speak of the Kingdom of God on earth, they refer to the rule of God in the ideal era to come, when God will be recognized as the Lord of the universe, not only by Israel, but by all members of the human race" (pp. 116-7).

The idea didn't die out after the 1932 publication of Rabbi Higger's book. From "Judaism 101", "Mashiach: The Messiah":

"Belief in the eventual coming of the mashiach is a basic and fundamental part of traditional Judaism. [...] The mashiach is the one who will be anointed as king in the End of Days. [...] The mashiach will be a great political leader descended from King David (Jeremiah 23:5). The mashiach is often referred to as 'mashiach ben David' (mashiach, son of David). He will be well-versed in Jewish law, and observant of its commandments (Isaiah 11:2-5). He will be a charismatic leader, inspiring others to follow his example. He will be a great military leader, who will win battles for Israel. He will be a great judge, who makes righteous decisions (Jeremiah 33:15). But above all, he will be a human being, not a god, demi-god or other supernatural being."

And, crucially, "He will establish a government in Israel that will be the center of all world government, both for Jews and gentiles (Isaiah 2:2-4; 11:10; 42:1)."

Moreover, one need merely watch the video "When Israel is Mighty" (it's spoken in Hebrew, but has English subtitles) to see some of the downside of this Jewish 'master race' 'paradise', in which the bigoted fanatics can kill Gentiles or rape 3-year-old Gentile girls with impunity. And these hypocrites will accuse any critics of being "racists", "bigots", etc.; they project their own vices onto their critics, in a tactic that has also been described as inverting the accusations.

DC: My starting point is this. Over generations, we have built something extraordinary in Britain – a successful multi-racial, multi-faith democracy. It’s open, diverse, welcoming – these characteristics are as British as queuing and talking about the weather.

Reality: It would be a shame if people who were genuinely fleeing persecution and oppression had nowhere to go. However, it's a question of numbers. Britain's population density was 660 per square mile by 2010, compared with Germany (593), Metropolitan France (295) and the US (85). By mid-2013, England's population density was 1070 per square mile (413 per sq. km.). Of course, mass immigration will lead to "growth" in GDP, but not necessarily GDP per capita, and people will not feel richer. There will be downward pressure on wages of low-paid workers, increasing strain on transport, hospitals, schools and water supplies, more pollution, and a need to concrete over more of the countryside by building new cities or expanding the suburbs.

Mass immigration is a vital part of Jewry's divide and conquer strategy - partly because it brings together the people whom Jewish fanatics set at each other after deliberately fomenting hatred, and in part because it allows Jews to operate and live off the host society without standing out like a sore thumb. And it's been admitted that mass immigration into Britain this century was the result of conspiracy rather than cock-up; it was a cynical, politically motivated plan introduced by the Blair government in 2000, to change the country quite radically and impose "diversity".

DC: [...] So as we talk about the threat of extremism and the challenge of integration, we should not do our country down – we are, without a shadow of doubt, a beacon to the world.

Reality: Unfortunately, Britain has become such a beacon that migrants at Calais are now so brazen that they break into trucks in broad daylight to steal a ride into England through the Channel Tunnel. If the stowaways get caught in France (and they are getting caught at a rate of one every three minutes), the police merely release them to have another go. If they make it to England, they've either made it and can work and receive benefits, or in the unlikely event of being deported (750 in 2014, compared with gross immigration of 641,000 in 2014 - up from 526,000 in 2013) are able to try again. Yet the truck driver is fined for a 'crime' of which he is almost certainly innocent, even if he asked officials to search his vehicle. And if the load is fresh produce, tons of food are thrown away because of contamination fears.

DC: And as we debate these issues, neither should we demonise people of particular backgrounds. Every one of the communities that has come to call our country home has made Britain a better place. And because the focus of my remarks today is on tackling Islamist extremism – not Islam the religion – let me say this. I know what a profound contribution Muslims from all backgrounds and denominations are making in every sphere of our society, proud to be both British and Muslim, without conflict or contradiction. And I know something else: I know too how much you hate the extremists who are seeking to divide our communities and how you loathe that damage they do.

Reality: As we shall see, it is Jewish extremists who are seeking to divide our communities for their own political purposes. These Zionist fanatics have created a clash of civilizations between Muslims and the West, and they hope to be able to demonize Islam. Naturally, they will camouflage their message by inserting talk about Muslims who make a "profound contribution"; whilst hoping to whip up hatred.

DC: As Prime Minister, I want to work with you to confront and defeat this poison. Today, I want to set out how. I want to explain what I believe we need to do as a country to defeat this extremism, and help to strengthen our multi-racial, multi-faith democracy. It begins – it must begin – by understanding the threat we face and why we face it. What we are fighting, in Islamist extremism, is an ideology. It is an extreme doctrine. And like any extreme doctrine, it is subversive. At its furthest end it seeks to destroy nation-states to invent its own barbaric realm. And it often backs violence to achieve this aim – mostly violence against fellow Muslims – who don’t subscribe to its sick worldview.

Reality: The sick worldview and extremist doctrine is that subscribed to by the likes of Rabbi Ovadia Yosef (who died in 2013), described by Benjamin Netanyahu, long-time prime minister of Israel, as "one of the wisest men of this generation". [Note: "goyim" is a derogatory term used by Jews to denote non-Jews (Gentiles).] Yosef claimed: "Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel. [...] Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat… That is why gentiles were created." On the question of making peace with the Arabs, Yosef asked, "How can you make peace with a snake?" and described Arabs as "evildoers". His verdict on Muslims was: "They're stupid. Their religion is as ugly as they are." The Rabbi's inflammatory hate speech was so extreme that his comments were condemned by ADL chief Abe Foxman.

Here are a few quotes from the Jewish "Holy" book, the Talmud, which shows what these racial supremacists and religious bigots think about the "goyim":

"The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts." - Baba Mecia 114, 6.

"On the house of the goy, one looks as on a fold of cattle." - Tosefta, Erubin VII, 1.

"Jehovah (God created the non-Jew in human form so that the jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night." - Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L.

"If a goy kills a goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy he is not responsible." - Tosefta, Aboda Zara 8, 5.

"A Jew may rob a goy- that is, he may cheat him on a bill if unlikely to be perceived (discovered) by him." - Shulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348.

"A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or a Jew. But a Jew is not forbidden to do all this to a goy." - Tosefta, Abda Zara VIII, 5.

"A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl." - Gad. Shas. 2:2.

"A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat." - Nadarine, 20, 8; Shulchan Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348.

"The Bible says: 'Thou shalt not cheat thy next brother,' but the non-Jews are not our brethren, but as mentioned above, worse than dogs." - Aruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 227.

And of course, some of that is discussed in the video mentioned above, "When Israel is Mighty". The murderous racism of Jewish supremacists is also demonstrated by publications such as Torat Ha'Melech (The King's Torah - Laws of Killing Non-Jews). It turns out that Benjamin Netanyahu "referred to one of the people behind the 'The Laws of Killing Non-Jews' [Rabbi Ya'akov Yosef, the son of the appalling Rabbi Ovadia Yosef] as a posek gadol − a great halakhic arbiter".

NetanyahuSupportRacistMurders photo NetanyahuSupportRacistMurders_zps5b2f6454.png

Source: Haaretz [premium] [free]

Rabbi Ya'akov Yosef, who was arrested in 2011 on suspicion of incitement to racism, was certified as a rabbi at the appropriately named Rav Kook Institute.

DC: But you don’t have to support violence to subscribe to certain intolerant ideas which create a climate in which extremists can flourish. Ideas which are hostile to basic liberal values such as democracy, freedom and sexual equality. Ideas which actively promote discrimination, sectarianism and segregation. Ideas – like those of the despicable far right – which privilege one identity to the detriment of the rights and freedoms of others.

Reality: Here we see Cameron employing a classic Zionist inversion of the truth. In Cameron's "Alice Through the Looking-Glass" world, the real far-right fanatics, who want to create a global tyranny that has the Gentiles serving Jewish bigots, are forgotten, or at worst, have become harmless cranks. And Cameron's "despicable far right" describes anyone who opposes the racial supremacists' evil plan to turn the earth into a giant prison, a fascist dictatorship, in which the Jewish bankers get richer and the poor get poorer.

DC: And ideas also based on conspiracy: that Jews exercise malevolent power; or that Western powers, in concert with Israel, are deliberately humiliating Muslims, because they aim to destroy Islam. In this warped worldview, such conclusions are reached – that 9/11 was actually inspired by Mossad to provoke the invasion of Afghanistan; that British security services knew about 7/7, but didn’t do anything about it because they wanted to provoke an anti-Muslim backlash.

Reality: Now we're getting to the crux of the matter. Naturally, in Cameron's warped worldview, the truth becomes a "warped worldview", and his warped worldview becomes 'truth'.

It is easily proved that the 9/11 terror attacks were not merely "inspired" by the Mossad, but were actually planned and perpetrated by Benjamin Netanyahu and the Mossad in the ten years running up to the event. And the fact that Cameron pretends to be too stupid or uninformed to understand that confirms his role as a Zionist puppet. All the proof that anyone could ever wish for is documented at this page "Israel's 9/11 False-Flag", which contains 912 hyperlinks, including those to internal bookmarks and external pages and websites. The information is compiled from dozens of mainstream sources such as The New York Times, the FBI, the DoD, The Jerusalem Post, Netanyahu.org, the United Nations, NIST, Silverstein Properties, System Planning Corporation, etc., which cannot all be accused of being "conspiracy theorists", "Islamist propagandists", "neo-Nazis", etc.

There is way too much evidence to include more than a tiny fraction here, which is why numerous books and websites have been demonstrating the imbecility of the official 9/11 conspiracy theory of nineteen Arabs with box cutters. Just to summarize, here is some of the evidence showing that the perpetrators were Jews, not Muslims (refer to the link in the previous paragraph for more comprehensive hyperlinks to sources):

Sivan Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner (Israeli Jews, ostensibly working as "movers" at Urban Moving Systems): Seen high-fiving, hugging each other, "horsing around", smiling, holding a lit lighter with the burning North Tower in the background, taking photos and video of the burning North Tower whilst atop a van at the Doric apartment block parking lot, 100 Manhattan Avenue, Union City, NJ, before news broke of the first plane crash on the local AM news talk radio station 1010 WINS, four minutes 22 seconds after the impact. Given cameras on the day prior to the attacks. Note: It's a 4- or 5-minute drive from Urban Moving Systems' office in Weehawken to Doric at the best of times, so even if a friend had inexplicably phoned the Israelis at Weehawken on a Tuesday morning rush hour to inform them after seeing the crash, on the off-chance that these "movers" might want to leave their work to indulge in a new hobby as amateur 'journalists', the "movers" had insufficient time to make the decision to take time off work, grab their cameras, run out to take their employer's van for personal use, etc. It's even worse if they'd learned about the event on the news (or read about it on the internet on the office computers, as they claimed they did!) like ordinary citizens who were also "documenting the event"; they would not have had time to leave their workplace, make a 4- or 5-minute drive in the rush hour, etc., to be seen atop a van before news broke of the event on the local radio station. 1010 WINS was able to run with the story relatively quickly because it happened to have one of its trusted account executives on her apartment's roof top (where she was letting her puppy do its business, since the elevator wasn't working and it was quicker than going down to the street) speaking on her cell phone to the newsroom at the very moment the first plane crashed, after she'd noticed it was flying much too low and could see it was going to crash. Moreover, despite the fact that the top of the North Tower was clearly visible from the roof of Urban Moving Systems - and even from parts of the street outside the building, Ellner admitted that they went to Doric because the vantage point provided "a view of the entire length of both towers" - before the second plane crash into the South Tower!

SK, YS, OE, Paul Kurzberg, Omer Marmari (Israeli Jews as above): Arrested at 3:56 pm on the afternoon of 9/11/01, following reports of their "puzzling behavior". Caught in possession of evidence "linking" them to the attacks such as maps with "certain places highlighted", and caught in possession of international flight tickets dated September 12, 2001 to leave the US for Tel Aviv via Athens, Greece, that they'd booked when they entered the US in June that year. Omer Marmari told the FBI that "Israel now has hope that the world will now understand us", consistent with the statements of Benjamin Netanyahu (q.v.) on how the attack was "very good" for Israel, and that even in 2008, Israel was still "benefiting" from the attack.

Dominik Suter (Jewish): Closed down Urban Moving Systems and fired his workers at lunch time on 9/11/01, before finding that some of his employees had been arrested, consistent with a Mossad front that had just become redundant that very morning upon completion of the mission.

Suter's mother-in-law (Jewish "Holocaust survivor"): Made a transaction on a Florida property on the Friday prior to 9/11/01, consistent with foreknowledge that the family might need to flee the country a week later (which in fact they did).

Dov Zakheim (Jewish rabbi): Sworn in as Pentagon Comptroller four months prior to 9/11/01. Former CEO of  SPC International, a company that produced "Flight Termination Systems" capable of electronically hijacking aircraft and steering them by remote control into tall buildings - or relatively short buildings like the Pentagon - at a range of hundreds of miles. Co-signatory to Rebuilding America's Defenses, a paper that set out the 'benefits' of a "new Pearl Harbor", and published by The Project for the New American Century (PNAC).

Larry Silverstein (Jewish): Close friend of Benjamin Netanyahu (and also a friend of other Israeli prime ministers and officials). Obtained a 99-year lease on the World Trade Center (WTC) Twin Towers and secured 12-layer, 22-company insurance coverage against terrorist attacks aggregating $3,546,809,904 "per occurrence", against "business interruption" and rebuilding costs, six weeks in advance of two "occurrences" of terrorist attacks on both towers. Already owned WTC7, and made hundreds of millions of dollars profit from that building alone from the insurance payout and swelling in value of the new building when it was filled with tenants. Habitually breakfasted daily at the Windows on the World restaurant on the 106th and 107th floors of the North Tower, but failed to turn up on 9/11/01 because of a "dermatologist's appointment"; his two children Roger and Lisa were also spared a ghastly fate after uncharacteristically failing to turn up for work that day because they were "running late".

Daniel Lewin (Jewish): Sayeret Matkal Captain, ex-MIT, and a one-time resident of Denver and Jerusalem. A "passenger" on Flight 11, who "loved jumping out of planes"; allegedly killed by a weedy hijacker armed with whatever he could smuggle onto the plane, even though Lewin could bench-press more than 300 pounds, squat close to 500 pounds, and "knew how to fight with knives and take knives away from people". His Akamai company had developed David Karger's "consistent hashing" algorithm for distributing content from web servers more efficiently to cope with large amounts of traffic, and Akamai flourished after the 9/11 attacks when web traffic surged by a factor of five for its global network of clients.

Benjamin Netanyahu (Jewish, several terms as Israeli prime minister): Sayeret Matkal Captain, ex-MIT, and a one-time resident of Denver and Jerusalem; thus, probability of not being acquainted with Lewin is close to zero. Wrote in his "Computerization in the Newspaper industry" 1976 thesis for his MSc in business management that "The integration process will be facilitated by advances in three areas: data compression, data base management and distributed processing" and that "The political power of newspapers is based on the ownership structure of the media". 'Predicted' in 1995 that "militant Islam" would bring down the WTC. Qualified to BSc in architecture at MIT, and together with access to blueprints of the WTC Towers either from his friend Larry Silverstein who built the original WTC7 in 1987 or from UJA/United Jewish Federation Board member and PANYNJ (Port Authority) chairman Lewis M. Eisenberg, would thereby have been able to calculate that it was necessary to take out five contiguous floors from a WTC Tower before the lack of bracing would raise the slenderness ratio of enough core columns above the critical slenderness ratio, such that Euler buckling and global collapse of the tower would ensue. Declared on the evening of 9/11/01 that the attack was "very good" for relations between the US and Israel because of how it would "generate immediate sympathy" and "strengthen the bond" between the US and Israeli people, now that the US had "experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror". In April 2008, when hoping for a second term as Israeli premier and needing to remind his backers of how he'd helped Israel, told an audience at Bar Ilan University that Israel was still "benefiting" from the "attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon" because of how the event had "swung American public opinion in our favor". Located in London on morning of 7/7 bombings, and had advance knowledge of same; Efraim Halevy, the London-born head of the Mossad as of 9/11/01, gave away his intimate knowledge of the London 7/7 operation when he revealed that he already knew the explosions were "simultaneous" in his newspaper article dated July 7, when the British authorities believed for the next two days that the explosions had occurred over a period of 26 minutes from 08:51 to 09:17, and did not manage to deduce that they were simultaneous until July 9. Son of the late Benzion Netanyahu, who was chief aide and secretary to Ze'ev Jabotinsky, the Ukranian founder and driving force behind the Jewish Irgun terrorist group. Menachem Begin, commander of the Irgun in 1946 when they bombed the King David Hotel killing 92 people, actually regarded Benzion Netanyahu as an "extremist". Benzion had a great influence on his son Benjamin; it was said that "Netanyahu soaked up his father's admiration for Ze'ev Jabotinsky and his doctrine". According to Benjamin's childhood friends, Benjamin "was always compelled to prove that he did not fall short of his heroic brother [Jonathan]". In 1998, David Remnick wrote in The New Yorker that "To understand Bibi, you have to understand the father". On the 60th anniversary of the King David Hotel bombing in 2006, Benjamin ("Bibi") proudly participated in a two-day seminar commemorating the bombing. His father-in-law Shmuel Ben-Artzi was a member of the Irgun and the Haganah terrorist groups.

Eitan Wertheimer (Jewish Israeli billionaire): "[F]riends with prime ministers" and was reading Popular Mechanics at the age of 4; thus, sufficiently influential to have PM run an article 'debunking' "conspiracy theories"). Met Bernard Kerik, then New York Police Commissioner, when Kerik went on a four-day trip to Israel, two weeks in advance of 9/11/01 (August 26-29); the trip was ostensibly about combating terrorism and Israeli Ecstasy trafficking, yet the New York Daily News report points out that Kerik took no NYPD terrorist or narcotics experts with him (consistent with a conspiracy involving as few people as possible). Subsequently provided Kerik with $250,000 "loan" after Kerik had claimed, "There was no explosives in the van", after multiple, credible reports of "tons" of explosives in the Israeli van in question that could do "great damage" to the George Washington Bridge, and after Israelis (the only people in the US who would distinguish various types of Arab dress, would know what a Palestinian looked like, and would have a grudge against Palestinians) tried to divert authorities to the Holland Tunnel by phoning the Jersey City police, claiming to have seen a van "heading toward the Holland tunnel", that the occupants "look[ed] like Palestinians", and one of them was "mixing some junk" (i.e., constructing a bomb) and "dressed like an Arab" in "sheikh uniform". Kerik also announced the "discovery" of a "hijacker's" passport that was in pristine condition after allegedly being improbably separated from 100 tons of aircraft debris and miraculously surviving a fireball whilst soaked in jet fuel, to be "discovered" at a location that was not consistent with the laws of aerodynamics. In addition, Kerik had rent payments to the value of more than $236,000 paid between 2001 and 2003 by Steven C. Witkoff, a New York real estate developer with business links and other associations with Israel, and received a $28,000 "loan" from Nathan Berman, a prominent local real estate developer and former art dealer who'd immigrated from the Ukraine in 1973. Kerik was subsequently convicted and jailed for conspiracy, lying and fraud.

Jerome Hauer (Jewish): On TV within hours of the 9/11 attacks to tell everyone that: "It... certainly has the fingerprints of somebody like bin Laden" and that the World Trade Center collapsed because of "the velocity of the plane" and "intense heat probably weakened the structure as well". Multi-skilled: an expert on building collapses who was forensically analyzing steel beams from partially collapsed buildings in 1999, a bioterrorism expert who advised White House staff on the evening of 9/11 to start taking the anthrax antidote Cipro one week before terrorists launched a US military-grade anthrax letters campaign targeting Democratic Senators and news media offices, a "veteran of emergency preparedness and management who holds a master's degree in public health" who persuaded Mayor Giuliani to set up a command post on the 23rd floor of WTC7 with mapping and communications systems that helped combat an outbreak of West Nile Virus that erupted in New York City in 1999, and an Arab terrorism 'expert' who immediately knew who to blame for 9/11 and gave the job of WTC head of security to his 'friend' John O'Neill, a former FBI counter-terror specialist and a real Osama bin Laden expert who disagreed with the official policy not to kill bin Laden and was killed when the WTC collapsed.

David M. Cohen (Jewish judge): At hand in the Portland court to sign an affidavit to 'prove' the authenticity of the 'evidence', after 'evidence' was conveniently 'found' both at Boston and in a rented Nissan at Portland, although the scriptwriters needed to insert a cock-and-bull story about a couple of the "terrorists" inexplicably making a trip to Portland in the rented Nissan, after they were already in Boston with a rented Mitsubishi the day before their mission, so that the 'evidence' could be discovered when the "terrorists" flew back to Boston at the last minute, jeopardizing the mission they'd supposedly been planning for years by risking missing the flight they allegedly planned to hijack.

Cass Sunstein (Jewish): Lead author of a paper entitled Conspiracy Theories; advocated "cognitive infiltration of extremist groups", e.g., those who did not subscribe to the official 9/11 conspiracy theory.

"Art students" (Israeli Jews): Mossad assets, spying on Arabs in the US from January 2000 to September 2001 for the purpose of finding Islamists to frame as suicide pilots and muscle hijackers; living in the vicinity of alleged Arab "hijackers", in particular, in and around Hollywood, Florida, a sister city to Herzliya, Israel, which is the home of the Mossad's Interdisciplinary Center.

Odigo (Israeli instant messaging company that had offices in Herzliya and New York): Carrier of a message, most likely originating from Herzliya, providing two hours' advance warning of the attacks on the WTC.

Don Radlauer (Jewish): As early as September 13, 2001, published an "analysis" whilst based at the Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya, purporting to show that it would have been an "easy" task for the "hijackers" to navigate the planes.

Eddie Guigui Shalev (Jewish): Served in the Israeli "Defense" Forces in the paratroops regiment; claimed Hani Hanjour was a "good" pilot, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Ali al-Jarrah (not Jewish, but an Israeli intelligence asset): Received more than $300,000 since 1983 for his "work" as a paid spy for Israel whilst posing as a supporter of the Palestinian cause); his cousin Ziad al-Jarrah was named as the alleged "hijacker-pilot" on Flight 93 that crashed into a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. More precisely, Flight 93 was shot out of the sky before it could reach its target (WTC7) because it was 41 minutes late due to airport congestion, and the confusion caused by the war games and exercises - effectively a military "stand down" - could not be maintained indefinitely.

Zim American-Israeli Shipping Company (owned by the Israeli government and the Israel Corporation): Moved out of the WTC, one week in advance of 9/11/01. Had the means, motive and opportunity to ship doctored "fireproofing" with embedded accelerants across from Israel, suspected of being fitted to floors 94-98 of WTC1 between 1996 and 1998 when Israeli "moving" companies operated in New Jersey and New York. Flight 11 impacted at a roll angle of 25° so that its impact damage zone encompassed five contiguous floors, those being 94-98, not only at the very center of the floors 92-100 with "upgraded" fireproofing, but the very floors with upgraded fireproofing with different characteristics (higher density, cohesion and sprayed thickness) that distinguished it from other upgraded fireproofing, with the impact zone spanning the same number of contiguous floors (five) that needed to be taken out in order to ensure Euler buckling of sufficient core columns and global collapse of the 110-story building.


For full details, see here.

The origin of the conspiracy goes at least back to 1991, when Israeli security officials noted that the Israeli-owned Zim American-Israeli Shipping Company's underground garage in the WTC was vulnerable to a truck bomb. This was not long after the November 1989 collapse of the Berlin Wall and subsequent talk about a "peace dividend". Peace is anathema to the divide and conquer Zionist Jewish fanatics, who decided it was time to bring in a new "enemy". They began planning a massive false-flag, a "new Pearl Harbor", to provoke a clash of civilizations - between the Western "democracies" and the Muslims. In February 1993 a truck bomb exploded in the Secret Service's section of the underground car park beneath the North Tower (WTC1), after an FBI supervisor had called off a plan to substitute harmless powder for the explosives. The conspirators included a Mossad mole and an FBI informant.

The purpose of the 1993 bombing was to provide a pretext for fireproofing (Sprayed Fire Resistant Material) "upgrades". Officially, the SFRM used for the upgrades was supposed to be Cafco Blaze-Shield II, originating from Isolatek in Stanhope, New Jersey. However, all the evidence is consistent with embedded accelerants in the upgraded fireproofing on the targeted floors, and indicative of a plan to substitute a lethal fake for the harmless fireproofing. As for which accelerants, the latest evidence indicates materials with a higher calorific value than thermite, such as a plastic, together with a propellant for ignition purposes, most likely based on powdered aluminum and an oxidizer such as potassium perchlorate.

The official 9/11 narrative asserts that three steel-framed high-rises at the WTC collapsed following office fires in which no accelerants of any kind were pre-installed by the 9/11 conspirators.

The temperatures generated by office fires, such as those of 9/11/01 at the WTC buildings, are "most definitely not capable of melting steel", or iron, which has a melting point of 1,535 °C, or iron(III) oxide, which has a melting point of 1,565 °C. The various structural steels allowable for use in the WTC construction had a carbon content of up to 0.3% (e.g., the Japanese JIS G3101-73 grade SS50; see for example NIST NCSTAR 1-3A or its Interim Report Appendix E). The iron-carbon phase diagram shows that 0.3% carbon barely lowers the melting point to below that of iron. Given the steel's maximum sulfur content of 0.05%, its melting point was at least 1,426 °C or 2,600 °F.

We can also discount the idea that jet fuel burning in air might be hot enough to melt steel. Unlike the thermite reaction in which the reactants include an oxidizer, when a hydrocarbon burns in air, the reactants and the gaseous products are inevitably mixed with atmospheric nitrogen, which must also be heated. Although the adiabatic flame temperature of the reaction exceeds the melting point of steel (for kerosene at equivalence ratios of 1.0 to 1.1, the AFT is ~2,000 °C), the actual flame temperature by the time heat has been transmitted to the environment is typically about midway between the AFT and the ambient temperature; hence ~1,000 °C. (In theory, it might be possible to melt a small amount of fine steel wire under ideal conditions, but certainly not steel floor trusses in an office fire, or even more massive beams and columns.) Moreover, all of the jet fuel would have burnt up within a couple of minutes. As FEMA pointed out [ of their 403 Chapter Two], of the 10,000 gallons carried by the plane, some 3,000 gallons would have been consumed in the fireball, and if around half of the remainder flowed away down elevator shafts, some 4,000 gallons of jet fuel remained on the impacted floors. The mass burning rate for free burning pool fires is on the order of 50 grams per square meter per second, so the burn time in seconds of a 4,000 gallon, 12,400 kg pool fire is 12,400 / (0.05 × area in m2), or in this case is equal to 248,000 s.m2 divided by the area in square meters. If spread over all of a single floor, then the area, deducting 10% to allow for vertical shafts and structures, would be 3,617 m2 and the burn up time 68.6 seconds. If spread over four floors, each covering a quarter of that area, the time would be the same; if spread more thinly, it would have burnt up in even less time.

Note that steel temperatures in office fires are always below the maximum (upper layer) gas temperatures. It takes time for heat to be transferred to the cooler, absorbing object, and the rate of heat transfer decreases as the temperature of the absorbing object approaches that of the heat source. NIST admitted that the "maximum upper layer air temperatures" would have been "about 1,000 degrees Celsius (1,800 degrees Fahrenheit) in the WTC towers", and also confirmed that "at any given location the combustibles needed about 20 minutes to be consumed". NIST said (NCSTAR1CollapseOfTowers, 2005 p.179) in reference to gas, not steel temperatures: "At any given location, the duration of temperatures near 1,000 °C was about 15 min to 20 min. The rest of the time, the calculated temperatures were near 500 °C or below." That would make the mean gas temperature about 600 °C for a given point in the fire zone. A method outlined here for estimating the mean gas temperature from the heat flux predicted an average temperature of 627 °C. And according to a study commissioned by Silverstein Properties, the temperatures ranged from 750 °F to 1300 °F (about 400 °C to 700 °C).

Similarly, oxygen-depleted underground fires that have been smothered with tens of thousands of tons of concrete dust, hosed with three million gallons of water and exposed to another million gallons of rain all within the first ten days, and sprayed with thousands of gallons of the fire retardant foaming agent Pyrocool FEF - of which 500 gallons sufficed to extinguish the Nassia oil tanker fire within a mere twelve-and-a-half minutes - should not generate temperatures at or above the melting point of iron or steel and mysteriously burn at very high temperatures more than three months later, unless accelerants containing an oxidizer have been employed.

Leslie Robertson, one of the top structural engineers responsible for designing the WTC, stated in a recorded speech that he saw "a little river of steel, flowing" in the WTC debris pile. Larry Keating said, "Sometimes the steel could explode when the buried ends were exposed to the air. You saw some of the thickest steel I’ve ever seen bent like a pretzel, and you just couldn't imagine the force that that took. The grapplers were pulling stuff out, big sections of iron that were literally on fire on the other end. They would hit the air and burst into flames, which was pretty spooky to see." Bronx fire-fighter Joe "Toolie" O'Toole reported seeing a crane lift a deeply buried steel beam that was "dripping from the molten steel" as late as February, 2002. There were numerous other reports of molten steel and molten metal found in the WTC debris pile. Wave dispersive spectroscopy (WDS) analysis of "a 40-lb chunk of previously molten metal from a larger 'meteorite' from the South Tower" found it to be abundant in iron, with very little aluminum.

Thus, the official narrative is a lie.

The fake SFRM, almost certainly of Israeli manufacture and shipped via Zim Shipping, would heat, rather than protect, the steel floor trusses. The SFRM upgrades on floors 94-98 of WTC1 were performed in 1996 and 1998. The New York moving market was already dominated by Israelis in 1988, and Urban Moving Systems was operating in New Jersey and New York for years prior to 2001 and was registered in New Jersey in April 1997. The Cafco Blaze-Shield II SFRM used for the upgrades was ostensibly transported from Isolatek in Stanhope, New Jersey, to Manhattan, but the conspirators needed to switch that for the lethal, high-density version (with embedded accelerants), which was probably imported from Israel via the Zim Shipping Company. So that's why the Mossad needed "moving companies" as front companies in NJ and NY, well before the introduction of the "art students" (and even longer before their "documenting the event"). And Zim Shipping didn't move out of the WTC just because it was an Israeli company; it was intimately involved in the WTC demolitions.

The Israeli "art students" - in reality, a spy ring - were in the US from January 2000 to September 2001 so that they could frame Arabs as "hijackers", with particular emphasis paid to Saudi Airlines flight engineers who were receiving pilot training in Florida. Many of them were living just down the road from alleged "Arab hijackers", particularly in Hollywood, Florida. Israeli moving firms such as Moving On Up, Inc. and at least five of the alleged nineteen "Arab" hijackers operated from the same 3389 Sheridan Street, Hollywood, Florida address at the same time in 2000/2001, albeit with different suite numbers.

Benjamin Netanyahu and the Flight 11 "passenger" Daniel Lewin were both Sayeret Matkal Captains, MIT-educated, and had lived in Denver and Jerusalem. Netanyahu needed an operative such as Lewin, who "loved jumping out of planes", to ensure the pilots couldn't regain manual control after the plane was electronically hijacked by Dov Zakheim's Flight Termination Systems and steered by Command Transmitter Systems. Zakheim was nominated by Bush to serve as Pentagon Comptroller in February, 2001, and sworn in on May 4, months before a plane smashed into the Pentagon's accounts section, destroying documents and outdated standalone accounting computer systems, and killing accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts, after the March 2000 public announcement that the Pentagon's finances were "in disarray" and almost $7 trillion of bookkeeping adjustments had been required in order to balance the accounts, with $2.3 trillion of those corrections lacking receipts. Zakheim had the authority to hire or fire those who did the data back-ups, and so billions of dollars could be stolen from Pentagon funds without leaving a trail, with the losses 'explained' as an unfortunate consequence of poor accounting practices and the 9/11 attack on the accounts section.

Similarly, in September 2004, ten months in advance of the July 2005 London bombings, Metronet Rail selected Verint Systems, a subsidiary of Israel's Comverse Technology, to provide its video networked "security" for the London Underground. The system would "enable security personnel to monitor passenger platforms and certain remote sections of the track". Thus, around 7/7/05, Israeli operatives had control of when the "security" would exhibit mysterious "faults", which would be timed to coincide with whenever Israel's explosives experts needed to gain access to "passenger platforms and certain remote sections of the track". The Mossad deceptively claimed seven minutes' advance knowledge of the bombings. They had advance knowledge - whatever time it took them to plan the operation!

As 'evidence' that the "Arabs" did 9/11, a red bandana was found at the Flight 93 crash site in such good condition, it looked as if it had just been bought from the store...

RedBandana photo RedBandana_zpszmvft5ue.png


...whilst the head and torso of the "hijacker" it was allegedly attached to, along with the other bodies, baggage, aircraft seats, etc, were all reduced to scrap and ashes.

Flight93CrashSite photo Flight93CrashSite_zps9vn8gefd.png


Some of the Israeli Urban Moving Systems "movers" were seen travelling to the Flight 93 crash site on 9/11/01, consistent with someone having to plant 'evidence' such as a red bandana to be 'found'. The heavily redacted FBI report on the High-Fivers revealed that: "Furthermore, on 09/11/2001, [redacted] of the Pennsylvania State Police detained a yellow Penske box truck upon the request of Newark. [Redacted] inspected the vehicle and determined that the vehicle's two (2) occupants, [redacted] and [redacted] both identified as Israeli nationals, were on their way to Columbus, OH. When Newark later questioned [redacted] of Urban Moving Systems about the vehicle's presence in Pennsylvania, he could not offer an explanation. According to the moving company's [redacted] the two (2) occupants and their vehicle were supposed to complete a moving job in a different part of the country." By a bizarre 'coincidence', the route from Weehawken, NJ to Columbus, OH passes within 2 or 3 miles of Shanksville and Indian Lake in PA.

The so-called "debunking" sites that try to prop up the official narrative will take various pieces of evidence in isolation and concoct some argument purporting to refute them. They'll avoid the fact that they need to repeat this procedure hundreds of times for all the evidence pointing to fanatical Zionist Jews and government agencies as the perpetrators, they'll avoid the fact that they need to be selective about what evidence they present, and they'll avoid the fact that they simply have no credible evidence whatsoever for their "suicidal Arabs did 9/11" narrative. Their version of events is so riddled with absurdities and their 'evidence' so weak that it is readily dismissed as:

In order to believe the official crackpot conspiracy theory of nineteen hijackers, one needs to believe that:

...along with many more impossibilities, improbabilities, and absurdities.

Jews certainly do exercise malevolent power, and that's why they own Hollywood, dominate the mass media, have pressure groups such as AIPAC, the American Jewish Committee, American Jewish Congress, American Zionist Movement, Anti-Defamation League, Bnai Zion Foundation, Jewish Council for Public Affairs, Jewish Federations of North America, World Zionist Executive USA, Zionist Organization of America, Jewish Agency for Israel (American Section), UJA-Federation of New York, World Jewish Congress, etc., and set up a propaganda organization called Hasbara Fellowships in New York City in September 2001.

DC: And like so many ideologies that have existed before – whether fascist or communist – many people, especially young people, are being drawn to it. We need to understand why it is proving so attractive. Some argue it’s because of historic injustices and recent wars, or because of poverty and hardship. This argument, what I call the grievance justification, must be challenged. So when people say “it’s because of the involvement in the Iraq War that people are attacking the West”, we should remind them: 9/11 – the biggest loss of life of British citizens in a terrorist attack – happened before the Iraq War.

Reality: When people cite the 9/11 attacks as an excuse for attacks on Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, etc., we should remind them that 9/11 was an Israeli operation. The Bush admin was involved too, but in a relatively minor role. It was the Israelis who'd spent the previous ten years planning the major event - letting the 1993 WTC bombing go ahead (the bombers were probably brainwashed by Zionist assets) as the pretext for fireproofing upgrades, putting the moving companies in place, switching the fireproofing, putting the "art students" in place to find Arab patsies to frame as the "hijackers", etc. It was only in March 2000 that the news came out about how the Pentagon accounts were in such "disarray" that trillions of dollars' of bookkeeping corrections had been needed, which was when dollar signs - or shekels - lit up in the eyes of the crooks. Zakheim was clearly a principal link between the Jewish Mafia and elements of the Bush admin who were lured into the plot to hit the Pentagon, after which it was necessary for the Bush admin to cover for Israel's WTC attacks in order to save their own skins.

DC: When they say that these are wronged Muslims getting revenge on their Western wrongdoers, let’s remind them: from Kosovo to Somalia, countries like Britain have stepped in to save Muslim people from massacres – it’s groups like ISIL, Al Qaeda and Boko Haram that are the ones murdering Muslims.

Reality: You can be sure that whenever Western governments "stepped in", it was not because of a desire to "save Muslim people" or any other indigenous people; it was based on what they - or the real powers-that-be who pull their strings - thought they could get out of it, and how it fitted in with their long-term objectives. The thing to consider is who benefits - cui bono - from the existence of groups such as ISIL and al Qaeda. At the beginning of the 21st century, there were just a few remaining countries on Jewish supremacists' hit list for conquering and converting to Zionist "democracies", such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Iran, and North Korea.

In 1996, when Benjamin Netanyahu first became prime minister of Israel (and as we saw above, was preparing to demolish the World Trade Center in order to provoke a clash of civilizations) a report was prepared, entitled A Clean Break. It advocated "removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq", "weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria", and changing the nature of Israel's "relations with the Palestinians, including upholding the right of hot pursuit for self defense into all Palestinian areas", which it described as "a justifiable practice with which Americans can sympathize". The report told of how Israel could "make a clean break from the past and establish a new vision for the U.S.-Israeli partnership". The study group involved in writing the report was led by Richard Perle of the American Enterprise Institute. A massive false-flag terrorist attack that would "generate immediate sympathy", and "strengthen the bond" between the US and Israeli people, would be the ideal trigger for making such "a clean break from the past".

Afghanistan became the priority when the 9/11 false-flag was nearly ready to roll, because the Taliban banned opium production in the summer of 2000. Given that Afghan opium poppy cultivation slumped to virtually zero in 2001 and rocketed after the 2001 invasion and regime change, the obvious conclusion is that the Taliban's opium policy hit trafficking profits of the CIA and the Mossad, and so the regime needed to be removed.

Source: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

Saddam, who at one time was on friendly terms with the likes of Donald Rumsfeld, and had purchased hydrogen gas generators (for inflating artillery weather balloons) from British company Marconi Command & Control that would go on to be depicted as "mobile biological weapons labs" when Zionists needed pretexts for war, had fallen out of favor with the Zionist elite and Jewish bankers. The post-9/11 Middle East instability ousted Gaddafi's regime in Libya. Zionists still have Syria in their sights, and they haven't achieved their full objectives in Iraq. As the 1996 report A Clean Break said, "The predominantly Shia population of southern Lebanon has been tied for centuries to the Shia leadership in Najf, Iraq rather than Iran. Were the Hashemites to control Iraq, they could use their influence over Najf to help Israel wean the south Lebanese Shia away from Hizballah, Iran, and Syria. Shia retain strong ties to the Hashemites: the Shia venerate foremost the Prophet’s family, the direct descendants of which — and in whose veins the blood of the Prophet flows — is King Hussein."

By 2002, after the death of Jordan's King Hussein, there was a plan "to merge Iraq and Jordan into a unitary kingdom to be ruled by the Hashemite dynasty headed by King Abdullah of Jordan with Amman as the capital of the proposed new country", because "it may become too hard for a new government in Baghdad to effectively control the whole country, even with US troop support".

So the existence of ISIL/ISIS/IS provides Zionists with a pretext for military intervention in Syria, and for ongoing military intervention in Iraq, long after the war was supposed to be over and the troops brought home. It even provides a (very lame) pretext for Zionists to say that "conspiracy theorists" (i.e., those who tell the truth about 9/11) are dangerous because they can radicalise Muslim children into being foolish enough to run away from their homes to join ISIL in Syria. And yes, any Muslims who flock to join ISIL are being very foolish, because they are only playing into the hands of the Zionists, who thrive on conflict. Anything that provides pretexts for Zionist military intervention would only facilitate their grand strategy to establish Zionist-friendly regimes in the few remaining independent nations. And terrorism provides a pretext for more authoritarian government, with measures such as mass interception and snooping of people's private communications, or controls on free speech. There is a far more effective way for Muslims to defeat injustices and to fight for freedom, and it doesn't involve terrorism or combat; see below.

DC: Now others might say: it’s because terrorists are driven to their actions by poverty. But that ignores the fact that many of these terrorists have had the full advantages of prosperous families or a Western university education. Now let me be clear, I am not saying these issues aren’t important. But let’s not delude ourselves. We could deal with all these issues – and some people in our country and elsewhere would still be drawn to Islamist extremism. No – we must be clear. The root cause of the threat we face is the extremist ideology itself.

Reality: It's true that the extremist ideology is the root cause of the threat, but the extremist ideology is Jewish extremism, not Islamist extremism. And the Jewish extremists' strategy (post Israel's 9/11 false-flag) is to pretend Islamist extremism is the root cause, rather than an effect of warmongering, hatemongering Zionist Jewish extremists.

DC: And I would argue that young people are drawn to it for 4 main reasons. One – like any extreme doctrine, it can seem energising, especially to young people. They are watching videos that eulogise ISIL as a pioneering state taking on the world, that makes celebrities of violent murderers. So people today don’t just have a cause in Islamist extremism; in ISIL, they now have its living and breathing expression. Two – you don’t have to believe in barbaric violence to be drawn to the ideology. No-one becomes a terrorist from a standing start. It starts with a process of radicalisation. When you look in detail at the backgrounds of those convicted of terrorist offences, it is clear that many of them were first influenced by what some would call non-violent extremists. It may begin with hearing about the so-called Jewish conspiracy and then develop into hostility to the West and fundamental liberal values, before finally becoming a cultish attachment to death. Put another way, the extremist world view is the gateway, and violence is the ultimate destination.

Reality: The videos were a very important piece of ISIL propaganda. It is clear that some or all of the "beheading" videos were faked. Filming is faded out as the 'killer' supposedly saws at the throat of the 'victim', without any blood appearing on the knife. The final part allegedly showed the decapitated head on the trunk of the 'victim'. In the Steven Sotloff video, the final part depicting the 'corpse' looks like a composite with the part of the image to the left of the waistline consisting of a video with the live actor lying on the ground, and a few spots of blood on the orange jumpsuit, with the jumpsuit's legs blowing in the wind. The right-hand part of the video with the trunk and the head - the hardest part to fake - appears to be a still image, without the slightest movement of the jumpsuit, as if the weight of the head and the arms conveniently tucked under the back was enough to prevent any motion, despite the strong breeze.

And again, as for who benefits from portraying ISIL as bloodthirsty brutes who behead people, push them off buildings, and burn them alive, it's those who need a pretext for military intervention in the Middle East, or those who are seeking to suppress the truth. And by suggesting that transmitting information about Jewish conspiracies will lead some people to violence, Cameron reveals that he would like to curb free speech. However, any hypothesis about who did some particular crime, provided there were two or more conspirators, is a "conspiracy theory". The difference between the conspiracy theory that nineteen Arabs did 9/11 and the conspiracy theory that Jewish extremists did 9/11 is that an abundance of evidence proves the latter, whereas the former is risible bunkum. Those who claim, in spite of the evidence, that Islamists did 9/11, are inciting hatred against Islamists. And it has been the cause of violence. In Arizona, four days after 9/11/01, Frank Silva Roque shot dead Balbir Singh Sodhi, an Indian immigrant whom he mistook for an Arab. The number of reports of hate crimes against Muslims and Arabs in the US increased from 28 in 2000 to 481 in 2001. In Texas, again, four days after the 9/11 attacks, Mark Stroman shot Waqar Hasan in the face, killing him instantly. Six days later, he attempted to kill Rais Bhuiyan by shooting him in the side of the face; Bhuiyan survived after playing dead. On October 4, Stroman shot and killed an Indian man named Vasudev Patel, after demanding money. Stroman was executed by lethal injection in 2011.

And Israel's 9/11 false-flag led to much violence worldwide, far beyond the scale of the ~3,000 people killed that day. The Iraq war alone is reckoned to have caused some 461,000 excess deaths in Iraq from 2003 to mid-2011.

DC: [...] In doing so, let’s not forget our strongest weapon: our own liberal values. We should expose their extremism for what it is – a belief system that glorifies violence and subjugates its people – not least Muslim people.

Reality: The belief system that glorifies violence is that of Jewish extremists such as Benjamin Netanyahu, who proudly participated in a two-day seminar commemorating the King David Hotel bombing on its 60th anniversary in 2006. These are people who:

DC: We should contrast their bigotry, aggression and theocracy with our values. We have, in our country, a very clear creed and we need to promote it much more confidently. Wherever we are from, whatever our background, whatever our religion, there are things we share together. We are all British. We respect democracy and the rule of law. We believe in freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of worship, equal rights regardless of race, sex, sexuality or faith.

Reality: It's good that Cameron professes to believe in these things. What remains to be seen is whether he will "walk the talk", or instead exploit ISIL as a pretext to curb free speech. There is nothing wrong with government broadcasting statements of its position and opinions; in fact, it is even desirable. And it is clearly wrong for people to preach hatred in the manner of encouraging disaffected people to indulge in violence or terrorist acts. (As for joining terrorist groups, there is the obvious problem of who decides which groups are terrorists.) But in order to maintain a balanced, honest debate, there should be no silencing of government critics who hold alternative views, but are non-violent and do not advocate violence. Below, we shall present an important example of one of these alternative views, and how governments attempt to silence it by imprisonment and fines.

DC: [...] And as we do so, we should together challenge the ludicrous conspiracy theories of the extremists. The world is not conspiring against Islam; the security services aren’t behind terrorist attacks; our new Prevent duty for schools is not about criminalising or spying on Muslim children. This is paranoia in the extreme.

Reality: The Israeli security services such as the Mossad are certainly behind terrorist attacks, even if some agencies such as British Intelligence are not directly involved.

DC: In fact that duty will empower parents and teachers to protect children from all forms of extremism – whether Islamist or neo-Nazi.

Reality: Here again, Cameron is trying to equate Islamist extremism with the truth that is told by historical revisionists of all political persuasions from communist to neo-Nazi, and to pretend that the Judeo-supremacist extremism of his own group is somehow perfectly normal.

DC: We must also de-glamourise the extremist cause, especially ISIL. This is a group that throws people off buildings, that burns them alive, and as Channel 4’s documentary last week showed, its men rape underage girls, and stone innocent women to death. This isn’t a pioneering movement – it is vicious, brutal, and a fundamentally abhorrent existence. And here’s my message to any young person here in Britain thinking of going out there: You won’t be some valued member of a movement. You are cannon fodder for them. They will use you. If you are a boy, they will brainwash you, strap bombs to your body and blow you up. If you are a girl, they will enslave and abuse you. That is the sick and brutal reality of ISIL.

Reality: For once, Cameron is speaking perfect sense. Anyone thinking of going out to join ISIL or whatever they call themselves should understand that they would only be playing into the hands of Zionist Jews and helping their global strategy of divide and conquer. As for ISIL, some would say they are a creation of Western intelligence agencies, and some would say they are genuine Islamist fanatics who were inspired by Israel's 9/11 false-flag and the West's ensuing "War on Terror". The truth lies somewhere between those two. But as explained above, when we consider who benefits from ISIL, it's Zionists who want to destabilize the Middle East to further their global objectives, and governments who are considering exploiting ISIL as an excuse to curb free speech.

The fact is that people who see themselves as freedom fighters can oppose the existing order much more effectively. Don't give Zionists what they want - evidence to support their accusations of "anti-Semitism", evidence to support the idea that Jews are so hated that they need their own sovereign State of Israel and Zionist leaders to 'protect' them, evidence that can be used as a pretext for military adventurism, and so on. Instead, hit Zionists where it really hurts them, by demolishing the very rationale behind Zionism.

In March 2001, the historical revisionist Professor Robert Faurisson wrote a presentation that was intended for a Beirut Conference on Revisionism and Zionism. The conference did not go ahead, but the presentation remains available to the public, and excellent it is. Dr. Faurisson sets out what Zionists fear and don't fear, and most importantly, what they fear the most. Here is an excerpt:

  1. "[...]
  2. But they are above all apprehensive of "the poor man's atomic bomb", that is, the disintegration, by historical revisionism, of the lie of the gas chambers, the genocide and the six million; they dread this weapon that kills no-one but that would not fail, if properly used, to explode their Big Lie like a bag of hot air;
  3. They fear seeing revealed before the eyes of the world that it is the imposture of the "Holocaust" that permitted, in the wake of the Second World War, the creation in the land of Palestine of a Jewish colony called Israel, and this at a time when, throughout the globe (except in the Communist empire), a gigantic decolonisation movement was well under way;
  4. They know that to lose the "Holocaust" is to lose the sword and the shield of Israel as well as a formidable instrument of political and financial blackmail; Yad Vashem, which, in Jerusalem, is a "Holocaust" memorial and museum all in one (now undergoing expansion work), is still more precious to them than the Wailing Wall; every foreign personality on visit to Israel for political or financial dealings is, before all other business, obliged to call at this museum of horrors so as to be well imbued with a feeling of guilt which will render him more malleable; sometimes there is a dispensation from this formality for representatives of those rare nations which the Jews and Zionists, try as they might, cannot rebuke for an active or passive role in the alleged "Holocaust"; it is then amusing to notice the Israeli officials complaining about the difficulty in dealing with partners whom they have not been able to condition beforehand;
  5. They are aware that "were the Holocaust shown to be a hoax, the number one weapon in Israel's propaganda armoury disappears (sic)" (letter of W. D. Rubinstein, Professor at Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia, in Nation Review, 21 June 1979, p. 639);
  6. They know only too well of "the fact that, if the Holocaust can be shown to be a Zionist myth, the strongest of all weapons in Israel's propaganda armoury collapses" (the same academic in "The Left, the Right and the Jews", Quadrant, September 1979, p. 27);
  7. They nearly faint at the thought that the general public might finally learn of the sum of iniquities represented by all the purges, the cases brought in the style of the judicial masquerades of Nuremberg, the confessions extorted on the subject of gas chambers or gas vans which had, in fact, never existed or the further confessions about implausible killings imputed to the Einsatzgruppen, the hunting down of old men, be they patients in homes for the aged, more than half a century after their alleged crimes, the indoctrination of all minds, from primary school to university, in books, newspapers, on radio and television, on every continent, morning, noon, afternoon, evening, night; all this is accompanied by a fierce repression of the revisionists, carried on especially in a Germany subjugated to its conquerors (and with which no peace treaty has yet been signed); these revisionists have committed the awful crime of simply demanding the right to verify either staggering accusations devoid of proof or testimonies received as truthful, albeit in the absence of examination and cross-examination, concerning the material nature of the purported facts and without, beforehand, a single investigation of the alleged weapon of the alleged crime; "

Source: Institute for Historical Review (IHR)

It's not a guerrilla war or a terrorist war that should be waged against the Zionist oppressors; it's an information war. Given the Zionists' military prowess, from the armoury supplied by their client states, they are never going to find thousands of terrorists or guerrillas more than an irritant. And it's not the culpable, elite Zionist Jews who would be threatened by terrorism, it is ordinary Jews and Muslims. However, an information war is their biggest threat. And "the poor man's atomic bomb" can, and inevitably will, knock the power elite off their perch. It is merely a matter of time. We shall go into the "gas chamber" myth in more detail below, and demonstrate how those who seek to suppress the truth and delay the day of reckoning are ironically increasing the risks of a very real holocaust in which there can be no winners.

DC: And as we do all of this work to counter the Islamist extremist ideology, let’s also recognise that we will have to enter some pretty uncomfortable debates – especially cultural ones. Too often we have lacked the confidence to enforce our values, for fear of causing offence. The failure in the past to confront the horrors of forced marriage I view as a case in point. So is the utter brutality of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). It sickens me to think that there were nearly 4,000 cases of FGM reported in our country last year alone. Four thousand cases; think about that. And 11,000 cases of so called honour-based violence over the last 5 years – and that’s just the reported cases.

Reality: FGM is indeed brutal and wrong. But consider the hypocrisy and racial or religious bias of many people who (rightly) argue against FGM. Judaism is a primitive cult that still genitally mutilates its infant males - they give this Male Genital Mutilation (MGM) the euphemism of "circumcision". Jews entered into a covenant with their "God", in which they would practise MGM, and in return, their "God" would make their tribe "His" Chosen people, and would make them kings of a nation. As we shall see, by the 1890s, Jewish supremacists had given up waiting for the coming of their "mashiach" to give them Palestine and make them rulers over humanity, and so they decided to create a hoax about "six million" dead Jews in order to gain the sympathy of the world. Five decades later, they succeeded in foisting the myth upon everyone as a new religion. Now, their "mashiach" is still nowhere to be seen, and in the internet age, the hoax of the "Holocaust" is unravelling like a cheap suit. However, there is evidence that their MGM ritual has a public cost, the consequences of which are frequently sad, and sometimes amusing.

"Brooklyn ultra-Orthodox Jewish counselor sentenced to 103 years for sexual abuse

Nechemya Weberman, left, a religious counselor in New York City's ultra-Orthodox Jewish community, was sentenced Tuesday to 103 years in prison, for molesting a girl who came to him with questions about her faith."

Source: NBC News

"A Jewish pedophile who publicly professed his love to the boy he molested is now trying to beat a federal sex rap by claiming he and the child victim were married.

Andrew Goodman, 28, stunned a Brooklyn state courtroom last summer when he turned to the traumatized teen and said, 'I fell in love with you,' before a judge gave him only two years in prison for years-long abuse that started when the kid was just 12."

Source: New York Daily News

"Pillar of Jewish community jailed for ‘despicable’ child sex acts

Convicted paedophile Simeon Osen, 53, of Chigwell, was sentenced to five years and 11 months’ prison yesterday at Harrow Crown Court after admitting 13 counts of arranging and facilitating child sex offences.

Osen, who is a prominent figure in the Essex Jewish community, is the former CEO of Ronacrete, a family-run construction company, and known as a key benefactor of Chabad in Buckhurst Hill."

Source: Jewish News Online

"Bethesda synagogue grapples with presence of rabbi convicted of sex crime

[...] Then in February, David Kaye, a longtime Montgomery County rabbi and registered sex offender, started attending Saturday services. [...] Kaye had been a longtime rabbi at Potomac’s Har Shalom congregation and was a leader of Panim, a large organization that trained young Jews in social activism, when he was caught in a televised sting by Dateline NBC’s 'To Catch a Predator.' He was captured on tape waiting to meet for sex someone he thought would be a 13-year-old boy. His 2005 arrest hit like a bomb in Washington’s Jewish community. Kaye was found guilty in 2006 in federal court of using the Web to persuade a juvenile to have sex and traveling from his Montgomery home to a sting house in Herndon to do it. He was sentenced to 6 1/2 years in prison and 10 years of supervised release."

Source: The Washington Post

"Mr. [Moshe] Katsav was not celebrating his birthday, however. He was spending his last day as a free man in his own home. On Wednesday, he entered a prison to begin serving a seven-year term for rape. Convicted of raping an employee twice while he was minister of tourism in 1998 and of sexually abusing and harassing two others while head of state, Mr. Katsav seems to speak from the core of his being when he claims to be innocent of all charges."

Source: The New York Times

"[Leon] Brittan 'a regular at paedophile parties': Ex- Home Secretary named as abuser by alleged victim on Australian TV show

The alleged victim, referred to only as Darren, said: 'He (Lord Brittan) liked boys to dress in women’s underwear and he liked to be alone in the room to punish you for wearing underwear'."

Source: The Daily Mail

"More than a dozen individuals made allegations to police relating to Greville Janner, the CPS said.

In a statement, Director of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders said there was enough evidence to charge him with:

She said the CPS were 'wrong' not to prosecute the Cardiff-born peer following investigations in 1991 and 2007."

Source: BBC News

In more humorous examples, the former IMF chief and self-confessed "swinger" / orgy participant Dominique Strauss-Kahn was described as behaving like a "rutting chimpanzee" and dubbed "Hot Rabbit" (Chaud Lapin). And the American Apparel founder and ousted CEO Dov Charney was caught on camera dancing naked in his office in front of female employees. Evidently, Charney felt he was too sexy for his own company's clothes.

As for the etiology, Roger Dommergue proposed that the 8th-day circumcision results in an infantile trauma that upsets the balance of the hormonal system, and is responsible for many characteristics of the Jewish mindset, including the responsibility for "anti-Semitism", which, as Bernard Lazare said, resides in the Jew, not the "anti-Semite". There is evidence of increased incidence of mental disorders amongst Jews. For example:

"Israeli and American scientists have discovered a gene among Ashkenazi Jews that increases their chances of developing the mental disorder schizophrenia, as well schizoaffective disorder and manic depression. According to a study recently published in Nature Communications, the gene in question raises Ashkenazi Jews’ chances of experiencing the disorders by roughly 40%, and by 15% in the general population."
Source: Haaretz

"The hypothesis posed is that the increased prevalence among the Ashkenazim of the rare lysosomal enzyme disorders, Tay Sachs disease (TDS) [not TSD ?], caused by low levels of hexosaminidase A, and Gaucher's disease (GD), caused by low levels of glucocerebrosidase, might contribute to the demonstrated increased vulnerability to schizophrenia in this ethnic group. [...] Two separate epidemiological studies in Israel have demonstrated at least 50 percent higher rates of schizophrenia among European Jews (Ashkenazi) compared to their non-European Jewish counterpart (Rahav et al. 1986; Dohrenwend et al. 1992). Rahav et al. demonstrated highest rates in the most religious Ashkenazi enclave in Jerusalem, a neighborhood containing several genetic isolates of eastern European origin who immigrated to Israel after the Holocaust."
Source: Schizophrenia Bulletin, Oxford Journals: "Medical Conditions in Ashkenazi Schizophrenic Pedigrees", Ann B. Goodman.

"The time has come to admit that Israel is a sick society, with an illness that demands treatment, President Reuven Rivlin said at the opening session on Sunday of a conference on From Hatred of the Stranger to Acceptance of the Other. [...] With regard to Jews he said: 'I’m not asking if they’ve forgotten how to be Jews, but if they’ve forgotten how to be decent human beings. "
Source: The Jerusalem Post

DC: [...] We must demand that people also condemn the wild conspiracy theories, the anti-Semitism, and the sectarianism too. Being tough on this is entirely keeping with our values. We should challenge every part of the hateful ideology spread by neo-Nazis – so why shouldn’t we here?

Reality: Historical revisionists are frequently labelled "neo-Nazis", "anti-Semites", etc., when revisionists are from all political persuasions. For example, Paul Rassinier was a communist turned socialist. (Supporters of orthodox history cannot challenge revisionists on the facts, so must resort to name-calling.) There is nothing hateful about correcting lies, injustice, myths and wartime propaganda - in fact, quite the opposite. The hateful ideology is that of the Talmudic fanatics who say that Gentiles are not fully human. What we need to challenge is the idea that the Gentiles (or the "goyim") are only the equivalent of dumb "cattle", to be farmed and exploited according to the whims of organized Jewry, so that the system will "furnish masses of capable and energetic citizens for the new Universal State". And we should challenge the idea that the Gentiles don't deserve to know the truth, but should simply be brainwashed into falling for colossal lies such as the idiocy about the Arabs doing 9/11, or the claim of a gigantic conspiracy by thousands or millions of Germans to exterminate "six million" Jews without leaving any hard evidence (written orders, homicidal gas chambers with significant cyanide residue on the walls, soil disturbances consistent with burial and exhumation of 900,000 corpses at Treblinka, decrypted communications or private diaries that mention gassings, etc.).

DC: Government has a key role to play in this. It’s why we ban hate preachers from our country. It’s why we threw out Abu Hamza and Abu Qatada.

Reality: Look at how long it took to throw them out, and how they were treated so well by the Blair government (and previous Tory governments). Sheik Omar Bakri, the Muslim cleric and father-of-seven, raked in at least 300,000 pounds in benefits between 1986 and 2005, was given a £31,000 Ford Galaxy people carrier under the Motability scheme, and his £250 a week benefits were topped up with £50 per week incapacity allowance. He lived in a house in North London that was worth £200,000 back in 2005. He called Israel a "cancer", which is fair enough, but had supported suicide bombings and the killing of non-Muslims, which must be condemned. Abu Hamza wasn't arrested and charged until August 2004, and Abu Qatada, although jailed in 2002, wasn't deported until 2013.

There was plenty of press coverage of these characters in the years after 9/11, and that's because they served as Zionist assets, who helped reinforce the concept of Muslim extremists and the myth of an Islamist central role in 9/11.

DC: We need to put out of action the key extremist influencers who are careful to operate just inside the law, but who clearly detest British society and everything we stand for. These people aren’t just extremists. There are despicable far right groups too. And what links them all is their aim to groom young people and brainwash their minds.

Reality: There is much about British society that is good: queuing, talking about the weather, relatively low levels of violence, a relatively good record on free speech, and a high tolerance for other people's beliefs and opinions. But it could be better, and the world could be much better, and we could be working towards reducing the risk of impending conflict by "lancing the boil" of an inverted morality based on false historical narratives. If we try to build a future that's based on myths, lies and injustice, it's not likely to be very successful. A future that's based on honesty and justice has the best prospects of creating a society that can reach its full potential.

When it comes to grooming and brainwashing young people, this is exactly what happens with the peddling of the inverted morality and fabricated 'reality' of the "Holocaust" legend, in which the Germans are made out to be the epitome of evil, and the Jews are supposedly as pure as the driven snow. The fact is that most of the people who are classed as "far right" want only to counter lies and injustice, and to move towards a system that has all races and religions on a level playing field, instead of Jewish supremacists having an inordinate level of political influence. Admittedly, there must be some nutcases (who really are "far right") who would love to blow up mosques or synagogues, and such characters need to be stopped. But those whose only aim is to bring about a better world, by fighting injustice and lies that lead to abuses of power, should not be lumped together with extremists who want to kill or harm people.

Consider the case of David Duke, who admits to having made mistakes in his younger days. There can be no excuse for picking on some group for no reason, such as black people. Nowadays, press reports about Duke will describe him as "former Klansman", "former KKK Wizard", "former white supremacist", etc. However, in this 89-minute video of Duke and the global economist Adrian Salbuchi appearing on an Argentine TV station, it can be seen that Duke is entirely reasonable, and is speaking candidly about the problems with the post-"Holocaust" world of today. He identifies the real racists, and they're not "neo-Nazis" or "anti-Semites"; they're fanatical Zionist Jews.

DC: And again let’s be clear who benefits most from us being tough on these non-violent extremists – it’s Muslim families living in fear that their children could be radicalised and run off to Syria, and communities worried about some poisonous far right extremists who are planning to attack your mosque.

Reality: Those who benefit the most are the Jewish extremist power elite, whose privileges are threatened by those who tell the truth. And they would love to have people believe that all their critics are mindless morons who would love to attack a mosque or a synagogue, or that Muslim children will run away to join ISIL after learning the truth about 9/11 or World War II. The fact is though that 9/11 truth advocates and historical revisionists have no interest in beheading, shooting, or blowing people up; the very idea would be abhorrent to them.

And when young people run off to join ISIL, it's because they've fallen for the myth about 'brave' "Arabs" attacking the World Trade Center. Those "jihadists" aren't inspired by facts or truth; they've been brainwashed by the Zionist media into believing the 9/11 legend, and then they've been brainwashed a second time by Islamist extremists into believing they should wage "jihad". Abdel-Majed Abdel Bary, the rapper turned jihadist who was pictured holding a severed head in Raqqa, praised Osama bin Laden. In Aleppo in Syria, ISIL runs a school named after Osama bin Laden that teaches children how to behead people and become suicide bombers. And a Syrian child sings a song of praise to Osama and the Taliban: "Our Emir Mullah [Omar] did not renounce his religion. [...] Our leader is Bin Laden, the Americans' worst nightmare [...] We have destroyed America with a civilian airplane".

OBL was chosen as the supposed evil mastermind of 9/11 because the bin Laden family were friends and business partners of the Bush family, and because Osama was dying of kidney disease. (He succumbed to kidney failure or a lung infection in December 2001, but in 2011, after he'd outlived his usefulness, the CIA couldn't keep making tapes indefinitely to pretend a dead man was still alive and broadcasting them on Dick Cheney's chum the Emir of Qatar's Al Jazeera channel. Thus, it was necessary to slaughter the male members of an innocent family by the name of Khan northeast of Abbottabad within a mile of the Kakul Pakistan Military Academy, to dump the bodies into the sea and claim it was in accordance with Islamic "burial at sea", and then most members of the SEAL Team Six were killed when "the Taliban" (ahem) shot down their chopper in Afghanistan - as a warning of what would happen to the remainder if they were too critical of the government's account of events.)

The jihadists are only interested in buying into the legend, and in fact the Zionist Jewish press should bear some responsibility for children who run off to ISIL. But given that the jihadists are playing into the hands of the Zionists, they're not going to complain.

DC: So as part of our Extremism Bill, we are going to introduce new narrowly targeted powers to enable us to deal with these facilitators and cult leaders, and stop them peddling their hatred. And we will also work to strengthen Ofcom’s role to enable us to take action against foreign channels that broadcast hate preachers and extremist content.

Reality: It's a question of how these new powers are going to be "narrowly targeted". If they target those who are genuinely peddling hatred that is likely to inspire violence against innocent people, then that's not only a reasonable measure; it's desirable. But if there is an attempt to classify truth tellers as "hate peddlers", this would be a gross misuse of power.

DC: [...] When David Irving goes to a university to deny the Holocaust – university leaders rightly come out and condemn him. They don’t deny his right to speak but they do challenge what he says. But when an Islamist extremist goes there to promote their poisonous ideology, too often university leaders look the other way through a mixture of misguided liberalism and cultural sensitivity.

Reality: The "Holocaust", as generally understood to mean the extermination of around six million Jews, with homicidal gas chambers accounting for millions of those, is a hoax. No one denies that there were work camps, or that people died on all sides, or that bodies were found in camps at the end of the war; it was a world war that was orchestrated by international Jewry. The legend of homicidal gas chambers and an extermination policy is nothing more than a modern-day religion, which is believable only by those with sufficient faith, brainwashing, delusional tendencies, or dislike of logic, science and facts. As in the case of the official 9/11 narrative, there is so much evidence to refute the "Holocaust" myth that plenty of books have been written and websites set up. For a comprehensive debunking, see: "The Non-Destruction of the European Jews", or for a more concise look at the various impossibilities and absurdities that the HoloBeliever is faced with, go to: "The Holocaust Believer's 'Logic' Flowchart". An excellent book that serves as an introduction for newcomers and a reference for more experienced researchers is Germar Rudolf's Lectures on the Holocaust, which is available as a free .pdf download.

For starters, if the "Holocaust" narrative were true, why on earth would Jews deny it, such as those below?

"The trouble is, that the forensic, topographical, documentary, chemical, photographic etc. evidence, all contradict the narrative." --Paul Eisen
"The 6-million-gas-chambers myth is an arithmetic and technical nonsense. As a matter of fact the howling, snivelling, Shoah business, 50 years after the war, is disgusting, debasing: it is a disgraceful shame." --Roger Dommergue
"I know from years of my own research and the research of others that proofs of the Holocaust are few. Literally, all there is are the 'eyewitness' testimonies and the post-war confessions. There's no picture, plan or wartime document dealing with homicidal gas chambers or a plan to exterminate Jews." --David Cole
"World War II was a Zionist plot to make way for the foundation of the Jewish State in Palestine." --Joseph G. Burg (Josef Ginsburg)

Here's why. A proper study of the Holocaust legend will confirm that it is riddled with logical absurdities and physical impossibilities, which required the improvising of a new set of lies to prop it up. For example, given the more than 1,000-fold difference in cyanide levels between delousing chambers and alleged homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz-Birkenau, it would have been absurd for the Germans to use 99.9% of their Zyklon B to save their prisoners' lives at the same time and place that they were using the remaining 0.1% for killing them.

The records of coke deliveries to Auschwitz-Birkenau totalling 1,037 tons (metric tonnes), shown on approximately 240 delivery notes for February 16, 1942 to October 25, 1943, divided by a generously low estimate of 20 kg of coke per body, points to 51,850 deaths over that period. The Auschwitz death books for July 1941 to December 1943 show 68,864 dead, of whom 29,125 were Jewish and 31,814 were Roman Catholic. Topf had extended the durability of the refractory brickwork from 2,000 to 3,000 cremations, but that was for an electric oven. There would be more strain on the brickwork of the coke-fired ovens at Auschwitz-Birkenau, making the likely limit 2,000 cremations per muffle before the firebricks would need replacing. Nevertheless, if we assume a figure of 3,000, and given that the records show only one replacement for a double-muffle oven at Auschwitz I, that places the total capacity at 3,000 x 52 muffles + 3,000 x 2 muffles = 162,000 bodies. Thus, allowing a generous extrapolation from the death books and the coke consumption to include 1944 as well, the evidence converges on ~100,000 deaths, and certainly not the claimed figure of in excess of one million (still an order of magnitude out, after it was revised down from four million!). The fact that the Auschwitz narrative is a proven lie is easily confirmed empirically from the performance of modern animal incinerators, which demonstrates that the narrative's requirement of cremations at 1.6 kg of coke per 55 kg of animal tissue is physically and technically impossible. 1940s technology that wasn't designed for cremating on an industrial scale is outperformed by today's incinerators, yet even the latter can only go down to around the equivalent of 9.6 kg of coke per 55 kg of flesh and bones.

To go into that in a little more detail, the 1.6 kg of coke per 55 kg of flesh and bones is based on a generous extrapolation of 2,100 tons of coke over 1942-4, divided by the typical Hoaxer claim of 1.3 million dead at Auschwitz. The 55 kg assumes the typical human corpse of a hypothetical "gassing" victim was moderately skinny. Extremely emaciated corpses would be harder to cremate, requiring more fuel.

According to one source, "One [human] cremation uses as much energy in the form of gas and electricity as a 500 mile car trip, and releases a staggering 400 kilos of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere". When carbon is burnt, there is about 12 g of carbon for every 32 g of oxygen and 44 g of carbon dioxide, so 400 kg of carbon dioxide is generated from burning 109 kg of carbon, equivalent to 120 kg of coke. This is a far cry from the 1.6 kg of coke per body that Hoaxers require!

Another source reckons on "573 pounds of carbon dioxide", which is 260 kg of CO2, and equivalent to 78 kg of coke. The report also tells of a new scheme that "dissolves human remains" using "one-seventh of the energy required for cremation". Unfortunately for Hoaxers, one-seventh of 78 kg of coke is still about seven times too much, and it's too late for them to start alleging the 'Nazis' had perfected such technology in the 1940s and the Topf ovens were merely a decoy to divert attention!

Modern animal cremators are much more economical than 78 kg of coke per human corpse; they can outperform 1940s technology, yet never achieve anywhere near the economy required by Hoaxers. A horse/cattle/pigs/fish incinerator consumes 6-7 liters of Diesel per hour at burn rates up to 50 kg/hr. Another incinerator for sheep and poultry and larger-sized pets is the same burn rate of up to 50 kg per hour, but Diesel consumption of 6 to 8 liters per hour. Taking the calorific value of Diesel fuel as 44.8 MJ/kg, the density as 0.832 kg/l, and a consumption of 7 liters per hour as associated with the maximum burn rate of 50 kg per hour, then 7 liters is 5.8 kg, which is 260 MJ, and equivalent to 8.7 kg of coke. So 8.7 kg of coke / 50 kg of animal tissue is 0.174 kg of coke for each 1 kg of animal tissue, or 9.6 kg of coke for a typical moderately skinny 55 kg corpse. The efficiency of this modern unit is better than Kori animal carcasses incinerators that could only manage a best case 0.333 kg of coke per kg of animal tissue, which is not surprising since the Kori results were documented by W. Heepke in 1905. And there is no essential difference between cremating humans or animals; humans are quite similar to pigs. Nowadays, experts agree that "Incineration requires a great deal of energy compared with other disposal methods [such as rendering, burial and composting] and is not considered a viable economic disposal option due to cost and labor".

There is a large animal cremator for horses capable of a cremation rate of 300 lb = 136.08 kg per hour. So that's almost two-and-a-half times faster than the 55 kg/hr optimistic estimate for Topf coke ovens. But the burner maximum input rating is "5,275,279.25 KJ per hour". 5,275 MJ per hour is equivalent to 5,275 / 30 = 175.8 kg of coke per 136.08 kg of animal tissue. The same manufacturer offers a large animal incinerator capable of batch loads or continuous feed at an incineration rate of 550 lb = 249.48 kg per hour. The maximum input rating, including the cremation burner and afterburner, is "3,692,694.60 KJ per hour". That's 3,692 MJ / 30 MJ/kg of coke; which is equivalent to 123.1 kg of coke per 249.48 kg of animal tissue, or 27.1 kg of coke for a 55 kg human. (Then there's the electricity requirement of 220 volts at up to 64.5 amps, which is up to 51 MJ or 1.7 kg of coke per hour.)

The fact that there were no exterminations is corroborated by the durability of the firebricks, the duration of the cremation cycle and downtime of the ovens, the recorded deaths (in the Auschwitz death books) of the very young and very old whom Hoaxers contend were immediately "gassed" and kept off the books, the "cyanide gas chambers" with no cyanide residue on the walls, the delousing chambers with blue staining on interior and exterior walls, lack of written orders for extermination necessitating postulation of "an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus-mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy", lack of references to gassings or exterminations in intelligence decrypts, lack of soil disturbances and mass graves at Treblinka, absurdity of using Diesel exhaust for mass murder, and much more too numerous to mention.

So then Hoaxers have to create a new set of ad hoc lies to prop up the original Big Lie. They must postulate self-burning bodies or supernatural cremation ovens and barbecues, and a gigantic conspiracy involving thousands or millions of people taking a series of measures to make it appear like there were no exterminations. There would be a two-level fakery of death books: don't count those who were gassed, but then include the very young and very old who were gassed on arrival, because otherwise the age distribution would fall off sharply at the cut-off ages and make it seem like there were selections and exterminations after all. This massive conspiracy had to be conducted by telepathy or "mind reading"; they could not afford to leave any written orders that would confirm exterminations. They would have a system of code words, e.g., in which "resettlement" secretly meant "gassing", and it would need to be followed so religiously that they never talked of gassing or extermination even in their encrypted communications.

It's also necessary that these 'evil', 'cunning' "Nazis", who were such technological geniuses that they could get firebricks to survive for 25,000 cremations when they should only manage 2,000-3,000, and they could circumvent the laws of physics to speed up cremations and cremate with negligible fuel at the same time, were so stupid that they used 99.9% of their Zyklon B in delousing chambers to save their prisoners' lives at the same time and place that they were using the remaining 0.1% to murder their prisoners. And because promoters of the Holocaust narrative were so embarrassed by the forensic results of Leuchter, Rudolf and the Hoaxers' own original study by the Jan Sehn Institute for Forensic Research of Krakow, they needed to have Markiewicz et al conduct a politically-motivated pseudo-scientific study that tampered with its methodology to fix the results as required, by looking only for unstable cyanide compounds, so that they could get all the cyanide levels down to the point that those in the benign delousing chambers were nearly down to the levels in the alleged homicidal gas chambers. As Germar Rudolf remarks, "The only attempt to refute Fredrick A. Leuchter’s most intriguing thesis, that claimed to be scientific, turns out to be one of the big scientific frauds of the twentieth century."

When the official WWII hypothesis is revised to be in accordance with Occam's Razor and the evidence, so that ~100,000 died at Auschwitz, there is no need to postulate an extermination program that was introduced, directed and paid for in "an incredible meeting of minds", a mysterious blue "paint" that does not contain fillers, binders and other additives contained in paint, leaves no brush strokes and permeates deep into the walls, development of supernatural cremation ovens or faking of coke records, faking of death books, cover up of Topf oven maintenance, cover up of exterminations in encrypted communications, secret meetings to arrange all the deception, and so on. And the physical impossibilities, logical absurdities, and implausible improbabilities simply evaporate. (Hoaxers can change the particular mix of impossibilities and absurdities, depending on which variant of the legend they espouse, but they can only eliminate them all by abandoning the extermination legend.)

With a requirement for at least 14 kg of coke for the moderately thin body in the eight-muffle - if we're very generous to the Hoaxers and pretend that all the ovens were as efficient as the eight-muffle (which of course they weren't), and ignore pre-heating, and with 1.6 kg of coke available per body after Hoaxers dropped their "four million dead" claim for Auschwitz, Hoaxers are faced with a deficit of 12.4 kg of coke per body. The idea that this deficit can somehow be made up by stuffing bodies together or by burning body fat is simply ad hoc pseudo-scientific claptrap, and no amount of testimony from lying "witnesses" such as Henryk Tauber will ever change the laws of thermochemistry, thermodynamics, and the conservation of energy. The lucrative, politically motivated Shoah business needed a whole new web of lies, to prop up the original lie of the "Holocaust".

Raul Hilberg, one of the top Holocausters, was always well aware that the Holocaust was a hoax, which is why he never even bothered to visit any alleged "death camps" until 1979, eighteen years after publishing the first edition of his book The Destruction of the European Jews, and even then, it was only as part of a group consisting of some members of the President's Commission on the Holocaust, on a two-day trip that included Treblinka and Auschwitz-Birkenau. Hilberg knew that he wouldn't find anything at the camps that would support his thesis, and he knew that selling the legend was a matter of trawling through documents and cherry-picking until he could find a set that could be made to appear to confirm the extermination thesis. Similarly, he would make heavy use of discredited witnesses such as Kurt Gerstein, Rudolf Höss and Adolf Eichmann, who'd been coerced into 'confessions' and saying things that were obviously untrue. He would take any statement that he thought could be sold to the gullible, and not only reject the most preposterous nonsense, but act as though his witnesses were credible sources who had never said such rubbish. And he would cherry-pick tales from "survivors" who were either lying for profit, because of peer pressure, or because they'd been duped by rumor and hearsay (camp propaganda). Thus, the true Believers would have their 'evidence' from eyewitnesses, from Germans who had 'confessed' under duress, and from 'documents' that had been interpreted and collated in a particular manner, and, in order to avoid cognitive dissonance, they would simply clutch at the straws provided by the "Holocaust" 'scholars', and shy away from anything that refuted it, preferring to imagine that revisionists were all "anti-Semites", "neo-Nazis", "right-wing extremists" or whatever.

As to why the hoax was concocted, Jewish racial supremacists and religious bigots had always had a dream of creating a Jewish "Utopia", as mentioned above and described, e.g., by Michael Higger. Around 1890, the Zionist program was born, most likely inspired by Joly's 1864 book, again as mentioned above. The fanatics decided they could not keep waiting for their "God" to give them Palestine; they had to take action to grab it for themselves. And one additional measure that was decided upon was to fabricate a hoax about "six million" dead Jews, in the hope that after gaining the sympathy of the world, they would win themselves Palestine.

Back in Victorian times, before Hitler was even a teenager, Zionist political activists already knew that they needed their own country because there was going to be a "Holocaust". The following quotes are all sourced from The New York Times.

January 26, 1891; this is from an address by Rabbi Dr. Gustav Gottheil, who alleges that Russian Christians are persecuting "5,000,000 to 6,000,000 Jews": "...and the fact that about six millions persecuted and miserable wretches remain steadfastly faithful to a religion that causes their life to be changed into a fiery furnace without the angel to keep it cool is the nearest approach to a grandiose miracle that has been vouchsafed to this unbelieving generation."
June 11, 1900; this report is about the previous day's Federation of American Zionists meeting at Cooper Union in Manhattan: "Rabbi [Stephen Samuel] Wise said, in part: '[...] There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism'."
May 16, 1903; this is about the "Kishinev Massacre" in which 49 Jews were allegedly killed according to the Jews: "The Jews concealed themselves in all manner of places, whence they were dragged out and killed outright or crippled. [...] 'We charge the Russian Government with responsibility for the Kishineff massacre. We say it is steeped to the eyes in the guilt of this holocaust. [...] So long as a 'civilized' Government brands 5,000,000 people as a perilous pest which must be slowly annihilated, so long its baser subjects will think themselves justified in accelerating the process of extermination with knives, axes and hatchets'."
January 29, 1905; the Jewish preacher Dr. M.H. Harris reveals Zionists need a "free and a happy Russia" like they need a hole in the head, since it could mean the end of Zionism! In other words, as Herzl said, the "anti-Semites" are the Zionists' best friends: "He declared that a free and a happy Russia, with its 6,000,000 Jews, would possibly mean the end of Zionism, since the abolition of the autocracy would practically eliminate the causes that brought Zionism into existence."
November 13, 1905; this includes a conspiracy theory proposed by the Rev. Dr. Joseph Silverman, who claims there was an organized conspiracy between the Czar, the bureaucracy, and the Russian Greek Church to massacre Jews. And Silverman says in a sermon at Temple Emanu-El: "The handwriting on the wall of the palace reads the doom of the Czar. [...] As at Kishineff, the Government was an abettor of the crime, so also now I can read the events of the past few months coupled with those of the past in no other light. This holocaust of Jews is but the culmination of the demand of the people for liberty." At a mass meeting, Dr. Madison C. Peters claimed, "...And now the reactionaries in Russia want the Jews exterminated, in the knowledge that while they remain there they will be a light in the darkness and the leaven of liberty which will in time leaven the whole lump so that in the long run despotism there shall be impossible."
October 31, 1911; tells of how "ministers and rabbis joined in passing resolutions pleading with Russia to stop her persecutions of the Jews...": "The 6,000,000 Jews of Russia are singled out for systematic oppression and for persecution by due process of law. [...] They are restricted in occupations, reducing many to starvation."
September 8, 1919; this is around five weeks before Martin Glynn's American Hebrew piece about "six million" "dying" Jews; Herman Bernstein is one of the speakers at a convention held by the Federation of Ukrainian Jews in America, where it is alleged that "6,000,000" Jews were going to be "completely exterminated": "Tales of massacres in which 127,000 Jews had either been killed or wounded during the last six months were told by the speakers [...] The President [Joseph Seff] reported that there were 3,000,000 Jews in Ukrainia and a like number in Poland, all of whom were in need of assistance from America. [...] This fact that the population of 6,000,000 souls in Ukrainia and in Poland have received notice through action and by word that they are going to be completely exterminated - this fact stands before the whole world as the paramount issue of the present day."
July 20, 1921; to make clear that this is not extermination by famine or poverty, it's stated as "extermination by massacre": "Russia's 6,000,000 Jews are facing extermination by massacre. As the famine is spreading, the counter-revolutionary movement is gaining and the Soviet's control is waning. [...] The information was gathered by Dr. Joseph Kreinin, a noted Jewish social worker and President of the Russian Joint Board of Jewish Societies. He says that several villages have been burned already and scores killed, seventy in one village alone."
May 31, 1936; this is well into TNYT's pay-per-view dates for most articles; this was six years before anyone was supposed to know that there was going to be a "Holocaust". The article includes: "Great Britain has it within her power to throw open the gates of Palestine and let in the victimized and persecuted Jews escaping from the European holocaust."

Jewry's original plan was to use WWI and their Bolshevik Revolution to grab Palestine. The "six million" dead Jews hoax was obviously discussed privately in the 1890s, e.g., at the Second Zionist Congress. In 1898, Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise attended the Second Zionist Congress in Basle, where he met Theodor Herzl, instantly "felt a bond with him", and "agreed to serve as American secretary of the world Zionist movement". As mentioned above, the New York Times reported that Wise spoke of "6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism" in June 1900. Wise campaigned for President Woodrow Wilson in 1912, helped write the "British" Balfour Declaration of 1917 along with Louis Brandeis and Felix Frankfurter, and helped to persuade Wilson to support the Balfour Declaration. From 1916 to 1919 Wise was "an important liaison between the American Jewish community and President Wilson". Thus, Wise was a rabid Zionist who regarded "six million" dead or dying Jews as a pretty good argument for Zionism.

On April 18, 1938 [p. 15] - before WWII had even started! - the New York Times quoted Wise as saying: "[Christ] died as millions of Jews are dying today".

Rabbi Wise was the president of the World Jewish Congress from 1936 until his death in 1949. The New York Times of June 30, 1942 [p.7] ran an article describing how Wise's World Jewish Congress had claimed the previous day that "Nazis had established a 'vast slaughterhouse for Jews' in Eastern Europe" in which "Jews [...] were being shot by firing squads at the rate of 1,000 daily".

So, after WWI, Hoaxers tried to pitch their "six million" myth, but were unsuccessful. In order to convince a critical mass of people, a confluence of factors was required: a Second World War that resulted in tens of millions of actual dead (initially, people underestimated the WWI death toll), the bribing of Franco's generals not to enter the war on the Axis side, the bribing of Churchill by Jewish-funded pressure group The Focus, the establishment of Hollywood as a major player in the motion picture industry, the widespread ownership of radios and the more select ownership of televisions, the use of Zyklon B in delousing chambers (benign gas chambers, that could be propagandised into homicidal gas chambers), and the seizing of territory in Poland by a totalitarian communist regime that prohibited access to the alleged extermination camps and constructed a fake "gas chamber" after the war.

And as for who was responsible for WWII, the blame lies squarely with international Jewry.

Germany's defeat in WWI and the outbreak of WWII can be traced to Jewish / Khazar racial supremacists' dream to create a Jewish "Utopia" by way of their Zionist program. The fact is that if it wasn't for Jewish meddling - warmongering, sabotaging peace proposals, fomenting revolution, and trying to oust a democratically elected government in Germany - the conditions (e.g., impositions of the Versailles Treaty) for the outbreak of WWII would not have existed. Hitler would probably not have come to power, and if he had, he would not have needed to save persecuted ethnic minority Germans, win back lebensraum to stop Germans from starving, and defend the civilized world against the horrors of Jewish Bolshevik communism. People die in wars, but responsibility for the wars can be traced to Jewish fanatics who already saw themselves as a "master race".

As the former Jew Ben Freedman explained, Germany was winning WWI in 1916 and was magnanimously making a peace offer, proposing that everyone should call it quits and go back to how things were before the war. However, Jewish supremacists saw the situation as an opportunity for their global ambitions. These Zionists did a deal with the British government, in which the British would agree to help them get their hands on Palestine, and in return the Zionist Jews would get the US to enter the war on Britain's side, so that Germany could be defeated. The deal was done. The Americans entered the war, Germany was defeated, and the racist Jews got their "Balfour Declaration" - although at first it didn't do them any good. They had to wait until they could get people to believe that six million Jews had been exterminated in another world war, and even then, had to resort to terrorism such as blowing up the King David Hotel in 1946 killing 92 people. They planned to conduct a terror campaign against mainland Britain, which included a plot to assassinate foreign secretary Ernest Bevin and drop high explosives on London using war surplus aircraft. Fortunately, that terror campaign was foiled by British intelligence.

Jacob Schiff funded Trotsky, and Japan's war against Russia, and Max Warburg funded Lenin, which led to the horrors of Bolshevism, and Hitler's need to defend Europe against Bolshevik atrocities such as the following:

In February 1919, a report "ATROCITIES PERPETRATED BY THE BOLSHEVIKS IN ESTHONIA" described the fates of Esthonian victims of the Bolsheviks:

"All the bodies showed signs of the rage and revenge of the Bolsheviks. The victims were all robbed of everything except their linen, their boots also having been taken. The Bolsheviks had shattered the skulls of thirty-three of the bodies, so that the heads hung like bits of wood on the trunks. As well as being shot, most of the murdered had been pierced with bayonets, the entrails torn out, and the bones of the arm and leg broken. [...] The women were to be killed first, as their cries were so heartrending the murderers could not listen to them any longer. One woman tried to escape, but did not get far. They fired a volley, and she sank to the ground wounded. Then the Bolsheviks dragged her by the feet into the grave. Five of the murderers sprang after her, shot at her, and stamped on her body with their feet till she was silent. Then a further volley was fired at the other victims. In the same way they were thrown into the graves and done to death with butt-ends and bayonets. After which the murderers once more stamped on the bodies."

After WWI, defeated Germany was subject to the impositions of the appalling Versailles Treaty. Germany lost all of her colonies, lost land to neighboring states, lost access to the Baltic Sea when Poland was given the "Danzig corridor", lost coal-rich upper Silesia, and was forced to pay punitive "reparations". The Germans were aware that Jews were responsible for the defeat; nevertheless, not a hair on a Jew's head was harmed. Finally, in January 1933, the Germans elected a patriotic leader who - unlike 99% of other so-called 'leaders' - was determined to represent his own people rather than sell them out to international bankers. This infuriated World Jewry; if one country broke away from the Jewish bankers' grasp, then others might follow. Within two months, Jews who'd fled abroad with their fortunes declared an economic war against Germany, with the headline: "Judea Declares War against Germany", "Jews Of All The World Unite In Action". This "Holy war" was aimed at starving Germany into submission, so that the democratically elected government would collapse and be replaced by one that was a puppet of World Jewry and the international bankers.

In 1939, partly as a result of territorial losses from the Versailles Treaty and partly because of how Poles had been emboldened by a mischievous pact with Britain and France, ethnic minority Germans in Poland were being persecuted and butchered. Hitler invaded Poland to save these Germans. We can't be sure how many were involved, but Hitler did have a valid reason to enter Poland, which is in complete contrast to Bush and Blair's fraudulent "WMD" war on Iraq. Britain and France declared war on Germany. Then, by June 1940, Hitler was making peace offers to Britain, even to the extent of offering to provide German forces to defend Britain against any attack by the Russians, Italians, Japanese, or any other aggressors. However, Jewry's lackey Churchill had became prime minister in the previous month, and warmongering Zionists, bent on obtaining their own State, dictated the course of events.

Hitler was so anxious not to harm innocent civilians that he said on October 6, 1939:

"Sheer sympathy for the [Polish] women and children caused me to make an offer to those in command of Warsaw at least to let the civilian inhabitants leave the city. I declared a temporary armistice and safeguarded the roads necessary for the evacuation, with the result that we all waited for an emissary just as fruitlessly as we had waited at the end of August for a Polish negotiator. The proud Polish commander of the city did not even condescend to reply. To make quite sure, I extended the time limit and ordered bombers and heavy artillery to attack only military objectives, repeating my proposal in vain. I therefore made an offer that a whole suburb, Praga, would not be bombarded at all but should be reserved for the civilian population in order to make it possible for them to take refuge there. This proposal, too, was treated with contempt on the part of the Poles."

In 1941, Hitler invaded the USSR in an attempt to defeat Bolshevik communism and save Europe from suffering the same fate as Russia. And in April 1945, Adolf Hitler went on to say:

"It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. It was wanted and provoked solely by international statesmen either of Jewish origin or working for Jewish interests. I have made too many offers for the limitation and control of armaments, which posterity will not be cowardly enough always to disregard, for responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be placed on me. Nor have I ever wished that, after the appalling First World War, there would ever be a second against either England or America. Centuries will go by, but from the ruins of our towns and monuments the hatred of those ultimately responsible will always grow anew against the people whom we have to thank for all this — international Jewry and its henchmen.

Only three days before the outbreak of the German-Polish war I proposed a solution of the German-Polish problem to the British Ambassador in Berlin— international control as in the case of the Saar. This offer, too, cannot be lied away. It was only rejected because the ruling clique in England wanted war, partly for commercial reasons and partly because it was influenced by the propaganda put out by international Jewry.

I have left no one in doubt that if the people of Europe are once more treated as mere blocks of shares in the hands of these international money and finance conspirators, then the sole responsibility for the massacre must be borne by the true culprits— the Jews."

The real holocausts, such as the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, firestorming of German cities such as Dresden and Hamburg, and the rape of German women, are ignored, after a fictitious "Holocaust" of the Jews was concocted out of thin air, so that the "Holocaust" hucksters could be awarded Palestine, could receive tens of billions of Deutschmarks in so-called "reparations" and receive many billions of dollars in so-called "foreign aid" to Israel.

There is an excellent 133-minute audio from Red Ice Radio: Nicholas Kollerstrom - Breaking the Spell, The Holocaust Myth and Reality (February 25, 2015), and there's a useful transcript of the show for those who haven't time to listen to it all. Kollerstrom explains the reality of the work camps, the delousing chambers, how there is a total lack of any documents or intercepted communications that provide evidence of an "extermination" program, and much more. He tells of how more and more people have been waking up to the true motives of the Holocaust industry (at around 112 minutes), and this awakening is demonstrated by the nature of the comments sections on videos and news reports relating to the "Holocaust". And he points to 2010 as a turning point, citing Israel's actions in Gaza. 2010 was also the year that Israeli forces boarded a ship from a humanitarian aid flotilla in international waters and killed nearly a dozen Turkish peace activists in cold blood.

An ADL survey conducted between July 2013 and February 2014 found that, for the Middle East and North America (what they call "MENA"), 63% of respondents believe the "Holocaust" is either a myth or is greatly exaggerated. See the ADL Global 100 survey [p. 41].

HoloHoaxers know they can never win the intellectual argument, which is why they have resorted to other measures over the years. Recently, Ursula Haverbeck, a brave 86-year-old German lady who questioned the "Holocaust" religion on TV, is facing charges and a possible jail sentence of up to five years. (This video of the Panorama interview has English subtitles, which are also found in the transcript - click "... More"). Sylvia Stolz, another German, is already in jail for a thought crime 'offense' that took place in Switzerland. The Germans Germar Rudolf and Ernst Zundel were detained and extradited from the North American continent (which was supposed to support free speech) across to Europe, to be jailed in Germany. David Irving was jailed in Austria in 2006 for a speech and interview that he'd given there in 1989. François Duprat's car was blown up by Hoaxers, killing him and destroying his wife's legs. And Professor Robert Faurisson was beaten up on multiple occasions by cowardly Hoaxers, including one time when three assailants sprayed a stinging gas into his face that temporarily blinded him, punched him to the ground, and then repeatedly kicked him in the face and chest, breaking his jaw and nearly killing him. David Cole (aka David "Stein"), a Jewish revisionist, was forced to recant and apologise after being beaten up several times and receiving death threats from Irv Rubin of the Jewish Defense League. What sort of 'truth' is it that needs to be propped up by bombs, fists, boots, death threats and imprisonment? It's not a truth; it's a religion!

(Fortunately, karma caught up with the Neanderthal Rubin. He died after slitting his throat and jumping or falling over a railing and plummeting to the ground in a federal detention center, his deputy Earl Krugel was killed by a fellow prison inmate, and his son Ari killed himself in 2012 by a gunshot to the head.)

Plato's cave allegory illustrates how HoloBelievers are equivalent to people who have spent their entire lives without seeing reality beyond the cave, and it's only to be expected that some will initially perceive revisionists as "stupid" or worse.

This brings us to the matter of why those who seek to suppress the truth and delay the day of reckoning are wrong in imagining that it will reduce the risks of conflict. The writing is on the wall, and it is no longer a question of whether or not the Holocaust legend will survive, but whether it will last for a few more months or years.

Cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias are the forces that delay people's rejection of false beliefs - such as the victors' version of WWII that features 'evil Nazis', "gas chambers", and "six million" murdered Jews. But because the Jews have had the absurd "Holocaust" fable drummed into them more than everyone else, they're going to have a greater emotional attachment to the story, and will find it harder to admit they were wrong. If it takes, say, two years for the average Gentile to realize the "Holocaust" is a hoax, but it takes three years for the average Jew to do the same, there's going to be a problem two years on, when in general people perceive the Jews as liars rather than Believers, and the Jews would be perceived as the problem.

So by delaying the process of everyone waking up to the truth, it exacerbates the problem. There is a greater duration between Gentiles waking up, and Jews waking up, and a greater risk of a horrific conflict in the intervening period. On the other hand, if all the good, decent people of all races and religions could agree tomorrow on how a tiny elite group of criminals, international bankers and warmongers (both Jews and Gentiles, but the Jewish fanatics are the driving force and the Gentile government leaders their puppets) have been stirring up trouble and fomenting conflict for the Zionist Jewish supremacists' strategy of divide and conquer, then the battle lines would be correctly aligned, and it would be a straightforward case of the good against the bad.

Everyone is not going to agree tomorrow. But if we work to get the truth out, we have a better prospect of creating a peaceful, prosperous, sustainable future for as many people as possible. Those who try to prop up the lies are increasing the risk of a very real holocaust. And whatever upheavals result, it would be quite a revolutionary change, but revolution doesn't need to involve political leaders getting the "Ceausescu treatment". When communism collapsed and the USSR was dissolved in the final months of 1991, with Yeltsin taking over from Gorbachev, there was no orgy of revenge and retribution. Mikhail Gorbachev is still respected as an elder statesman, and the (mostly) peaceful removal of communist regimes should be seen as the model for an orderly transition to a post-Zionist world. Israel is a cancer that needs to be removed. But the cancer is the Zionist regime; wiping Israel off the map has the same meaning as wiping the USSR off the map. It's the political map, not the physical map, that needs to be redrawn, so that Jews and Arabs can again live together in peace, as they did before the Zionist disease.

It's only during the last few years that people have been waking up to lies such as the "Holocaust", and governments can still plead ignorance. Presidents and prime ministers can argue that they were too busy to examine the work of the revisionists, and their underlings and advisors have no incentive to approach them and say, "Look, I think this story of Nazi gas chambers / Arab hijackers has a few problems", since it wouldn't be good for their careers. But imagine how much worse it could get if governments try to hold back the tide for another ten years or so by extending repressive measures such as Draconian controls on free speech, and meanwhile, the general public gets to learn the truth (e.g., by encrypted communications to social media contacts). Government would be seen as the problem, and a bloody outcome could involve firing squads, hangings, etc. And Elie Wiesel would escape justice!

In recent times, the biggest guilt lies with those such as Bush and Blair, who should be charged with war crimes. There is a criminal elite who have become immensely rich from the profiteering and deceptions, but the best possible outcome would involve their confessing to their crimes, cooperating with prosecutors, and the redistribution of their ill-gotten gains to enrich the world's people, with priority given to the more deserving cases. The criminals could be made to write their memoirs, and then go on speaking tours, so that the conspiracy would be fully documented. The proceeds would also be redistributed. And the message would be that such a conspiracy must never be allowed to happen again; the next time, there would be summary executions for the perpetrators.

Every $7 trillion recovered is a lump sum of almost $1,000 apiece, but the following groups should have priority claim upon the massive fortunes to be redistributed:

Reform will require other changes, such as not allowing any minority interest group to dominate the press. Since barring people from positions because of their race or religion, even as a temporary measure, is hardly an ideal solution, and best avoided if at all possible, a better alternative would be for journalists to form and sign up to a new union dedicated to changing the mainstream media from an outlet for lies and propaganda to the fount of truth and reason. The policy would be that its members were going to expose the reality of 9/11, the "Holocaust", and the Zionist conspiracy for world domination, and if influential Jewish media bosses, the ADL or the Simon Wiesenthal Center didn't like it, they would have to train a new set of puppets from scratch, to write their lying drivel. Media bosses who refused to accept the international union's demands would have no workers left and their circulation would plummet. Rather than wait to see if they could persuade any more new recruits to write baloney (although it might be an interesting experiment to see how lying media outlets could compete against competitors with equal resources who told the truth), an even better solution would be to have any belligerent media moguls arrested as accessories to terrorism, war crimes and fraud. They would not even be allowed to produce so much as an internal newsletter for the jail! In the meantime, there would be tremendous opportunities in journalism to expose the various deceptions and bring the truth to the man in the street.

David Cameron has a golden opportunity, since he has another five years in power - and a lot can happen in five years. As Nicholas Kollerstrom said, the comments section of videos and news articles on the "Holocaust" shows which way the tide is turning. Current prime ministers and presidents will make themselves look very foolish if they cannot see the writing on the wall. They have every incentive to align themselves with progressive, rather than regressive, forces. We need to make the transition to the post-Zionist age as orderly as possible, and political leaders who are seen as progressive will still be listened to and regarded as elder statesmen like Gorbachev, years later, when Zionism has gone the same way as the USSR.

DC: [...] And let’s remember that it’s only the extremists who divide people into good Muslims and bad Muslims, by forcing their warped doctrine onto fellow Muslims and telling them that it is the only way to believe. Our new approach is about isolating the extremists from everyone else, so that all our Muslim communities can be free from the poison of Islamist extremism.

Reality: And the extremists who instigated all that are the Zionist Jewish fanatics who decided in 1991, as the USSR collapsed, that it was time to bring in a new enemy. That was the year that Israeli security officials noted that the Israeli-owned Zim American-Israeli Shipping Company's underground garage in the WTC was vulnerable to a truck bomb, a couple of years before a truck bomb did in fact explode in the WTC underground garage.

DC: [...] Together we will defeat the extremists and build a stronger and more cohesive country, for our children, our grandchildren and for every generation to come.

Reality: Yes, provided the extremists are properly identified as described above. Today's political leaders have two choices. (1) Keep dancing to the tune of the organ grinders, attempt to hold back the tide of truth, and risk catastrophe. (2) Break away from the chains, go with the flow, and work for truth, justice and peace.

Take Our World Back front page