Israel's 9/11 False-Flag

There is ample evidence of Jewish terrorists' central role in masterminding the September 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon (henceforth, "9/11"). We shall start by presenting Exhibit 1, an FBI report on the so-called "dancing Israelis", whom the FBI dubbed the "High-Fivers". The report "KURZBERG, SIVAN ET AL" is available from the FBI on CD, and the six files were uploaded to Scribd in 2011. Since Scribd stopped allowing downloads for those without a paid account, the files were uploaded to an open public account. They may be viewed or downloaded from the links at this page.

Exhibit 1, a primary source, is corroborated by mainstream sources such as The New York Times, Fox News, The (Bergen) Record of New Jersey, and the East Rutherford Police Department (in a report dated 09/11/01 at 1556). There is multiple corroborating evidence as documented here from sources such as The New York Observer, the Daily News (New York), CNN, Silverstein Properties, The Washington Times, the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, The Jerusalem Post, Haaretz, Arutz Sheva,,,, The Times (London, original), The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Boston Globe, the Los Angeles Times, The Seattle Times, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, The Mercury (Pottstown, PA), The Miami Herald, The Chicago Sun-Times, Asia Times Online, System Planning Corporation, the Mineta Transportation Institute / Norman Mineta, the Eisenhower Research Project, the Belfer Center, the United Nations, the DoD, etc. These cannot all be dismissed as "neo-Nazis", "anti-Semites", or "conspiracy theorists".

The accused, Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu, was prime minister of Israel from June 18, 1996 to July 6, 1999, and for subsequent terms starting March 31, 2009. The actions of Sivan Kurzberg, Oded Ellner and Yaron Shmuel ("the High-Fivers") at the parking lot of the Doric apartment block, 100 Manhattan Avenue, Union City, New Jersey ("Doric"), on the morning of Tuesday September 11, 2001, serve inter alia as proof positive that 9/11 was a Zionist false-flag operation, conceived and masterminded by high-ranking officials of the State of Israel. The High-Fivers are Israeli nationals and co-religionists of Netanyahu.

Flight 11 crashed into the North Tower (WTC1) at approximately 8:46:30 a.m. on 9/11/01; Flight 175 crashed into the South Tower at 09:03:02. One eyewitness at Doric, a housewife ("witness #1") living in the apartment block, reported seeing the High-Fivers kneeling on top of a white van in the rear parking lot. Two of them were facing the apartment complex, and the third was facing New York City, apparently "taking still photographs and video" of the other two with the burning tower in the background. They were hugging each other and smiling; all were of jovial appearance, and "appeared to 'high five' one another". Their happy emotional state and total lack of empathy for the WTC occupants and aircraft passengers was confirmed when the photographs they'd taken were developed by the FBI. "[T]he Israelis are visibly happy on nearly all" of the photos. And there weren't just a few; there were "seventy-six" photographs. "[N]early all" of 76 is about five or six dozen photos!

Sivan Kurzberg was celebrating by "holding a lighted lighter in the foreground, with the smoldering wreckage in the background", like he was at a rock concert.

As will be demonstrated, the High-Fivers were observed at Doric atop the white van with their cameras and celebrating, less than five minutes after the first plane crash, and certainly did not have time to learn of the event, decide to take time off work to participate in a new hobby as "journalists", borrow their employer's van for personal use, make a 4- or 5-minute drive in rush-hour traffic, climb on top the van, and so on.






Source: Exhibit 1, Section 1, pp. 35, 80, 63-65

There is a reference to "approximately 9:00 AM". It is not in dispute that the High-Fivers were seen at Doric before the second plane crash, when innocent bystanders believed the first crash was simply a terrible accident rather than terrorism. And it was indeed "approximately 9:00 AM", in that it was closer to 9 AM than to 8 or 10 AM. However, other lines of evidence place the time much more accurately, at within five minutes of the first plane crash. Note how witness #1 was "listening to 1010" WINS, the local "AM news radio station", and "did not hear any information regarding the WTC" by the time her friend and neighbor ("witness #2") telephoned her to "tell her that she saw smoke coming from" the WTC. Anyone listening to the radio would not have forgotten breaking news of a plane crashing into the WTC, by the time they were interviewed by the FBI only hours later on the very same day! Moreover, given that the call from witness #2 prompted witness #1 to go and see for herself, if the news had broken on 1010 WINS prior to witness #2's telephone call, that would have similarly prompted witness #1 to go and see for herself rather than wait until the telephone call. Thus, we can reject the possibility that witness #2's telephone call followed WINS' announcement of the first plane crash. Witness #1 received that call prior to any announcement on WINS.

The news broke on 1010 WINS like this:
"Breaking news now, on 1010 WINS... This just in to our newsroom; a plane has crashed into the World Trade Center. Let's get this live update from 1010 WINS correspondent Joan Fleischer. Joan, what do you see?"
"Well, I'm standing on the top of my roof, and I'm looking at the World Trade Center, and there's a huge hole in it, and there's a fire in the building, right now. Huge smoke pouring out of it, and things are falling from the building itself."

The audio file here of 1010 WINS' broadcast on the morning of 09/11/01 runs for 20 minutes and 8 seconds, from 08:47:10, just before the time of 8:47 is announced at the end of the sports news, to 09:07:18, a few minutes after the second plane crash of Flight 175 into the South Tower. Since the time of the second plane crash has been accurately pinpointed at 09:03:02, and at 15:52 into the audio a caller reports, "There is now another explosion, occurring right at this moment in the other building" (a cry of shock is heard at that point), the chronological time on 09/11/01 for any point in the audio file is obtained from:
hh:mm:ss = 08:47:10 + audio time ( E.g., 08:47:10 + 15:52 = 09:03:02.

The program is interrupted at 03:29 (08:50:39), and the announcement "a plane has crashed into the World Trade Center" is completed by 03:42 (08:50:52). Thus, witness #1, who was "listening to 1010" WINS and "did not hear any information regarding the WTC", must have received the telephone call from her friend at some time earlier than 08:50:52 AM. At 08:50:52 and later times of relevance, the events at the WTC were the station's only topic of discussion.

(Before WINS' interruption for the breaking news, it's worth mentioning that at around 2:20 into the audio, which is 08:49:30 or three minutes after the first plane crash, there is a report about seven Palestinians being injured by Israeli troops in Jenin, in the West Bank. No Israelis were hurt. Israel, with all the self-assurance of a bully who knows that a major event is about to win him sympathy and carte blanche to step up his attacks, claims the city was "the staging ground for Palestinian terrorist attacks". News follows of a rally planned for later that month in Manhattan - the "Solidarity Rally" in support of Israel. The planners hope for a turnout of 50,000; those billed as attendees include Elie Wiesel and Ariel Sharon.)

A further line of evidence concerns the statement from witness #2, for which we refer to Exhibit 1, Section 3. Witness #2 "awoke at approximately 8:30 am" on 9/11/01; she was aware of the time because she looked at her alarm clock, located next to her bed. She got up and went to her kitchen to prepare coffee. Whilst preparing coffee and watching the Spanish language morning television show Despierta América, she "heard a strange noise". Suspecting that it could have been some of the "machinery that is located behind her apartment complex", she went to her window to investigate the sound. She scanned the area, and did not notice anything until looking at the WTC, whereupon she "noticed a small cloud of smoke rising from one of the towers". After noticing the smoke, she "immediately telephoned her friend" to tell her "there was smoke rising from the WTC and to look out her window".


Source: Exhibit 1, Section 3, p. 67

It would be a remarkable coincidence if the apartment complex's machinery had made a "strange noise" - sufficiently "strange" and loud that it prompted witness #2 to go and investigate - within a couple of minutes of a plane crashing into WTC1, which would indeed have made a "strange" noise, untypical of other sounds regularly heard. It is close to a certainty that this "strange noise" was in fact either the impact and explosion of the first crash, or the roar of the plane as it approached at low altitude from the north. As the crow flies, it's about 3.1 miles from the Doric apartments to the WTC, and there's no intervening buildings to obscure the sound. Even when the B-25 hit the Empire State Building at only 225 mph in 1945, the impact could be heard two miles away. In 1948, a DC-3 (maximum cruising speed 207 mph) crashed into a mountain at 3,000 feet in Australia. Most of the passengers survived, yet the crash was heard five miles away!

(In that November 1948 report in the last hyperlink, Israel denies receiving arms from Russia, and describes reports of covert arms smuggling between Czechoslovakia and Israel as "a fantastic story and a tissue of malicious lies". The French have a saying: plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)

Witness #2 does not mention any announcement of the news on the TV channel, but they would have been unlikely to have had a trusted member of the station on her rooftop on her phone to the newsroom just as the first plane hit, in contrast to 1010 WINS, whose account executive Joan Fleischer had to take her new puppy out to do its business, the elevator wasn't working, and it was easier to go up onto the roof on North Moore Street, only 0.6 miles north of Vesey Street. Moreover, the amount of smoke rising from one tower was only "a small cloud", sufficiently small that it was not even noticeable when witness #2 was initially scanning the area, and was only evident when she looked directly at the WTC. Thus, this would have to have been very soon after the initial impact, before much smoke had been generated. And so all of witness #2's testimony corroborates the evidence from witness #1 that the phone call from her friend was prior to any announcement on WINS, and followed very shortly after the first plane crash.

Also from Exhibit 1, Section 3 is another interview with witness #1.


Source: Exhibit 1, Section 3, p. 4

Witness #1's testimony to the FBI, on the same day as the attacks and over the following few days, never mentioned anything about seeing a van arrive and park up, or of three men getting out and climbing onto the roof with their cameras, as some of Israel's appeasers would have us believe. She was interviewed several times, and consistently stated that the three men were already on the roof of the van, taking video and still photographs. For example:

Section 3 (as above, p. 4): "[Witness #2] ended the call and [witness #1] took a pair of binoculars and walked over to the window. When she looked out, she also noticed a white van parked in the parking lot for her building, approximately five or six parking spaces from the south end of the lot, in a direct line between her and the WTC. There were three young men on top of the van, which was parked at an angle pointing directly at the WTC. She saw one of the males holding a small video camera. One of the men had his hand on the shoulder of the other and they appeared to be happy and 'joking around'."
Section 1, p. 64: "Using her binoculars [witness #1] looked through her rear window. Then she opened the balcony door and walked onto the balcony. As she looked in the direction of the WTC, she observed three (3) males kneeling on the roof of a white van in the rear parking lot of her apartment complex."
Section 1, p. 83: "In the morning hours of 09/11/2001, [witness #1] observed three (3) males on top of a white van with one (1) camera. [Witness #1] believes that it was a video recording device rather than a still camera. [...] [Witness #1] also recalls the males appeared to be 'horsing around'."
Section 1, pp. 32-33: "From the rear window of her apartment and while looking in the direction of the WTC, [witness #1] observed three (3) males kneeling on the roof of a white van located in the rear parking lot of her apartment complex. [...] According to [blank] one of the males appeared to be taking still photographs and video of the other males with the WTC in the background. All of the males appeared to be jovial in that they smiled, hugged one another, and gave 'high fives.' (See attached photos)."
Section 6 (as below, p. 49): "According to T-1, it was the call from T-2, who is T-1's neighbor and close friend, which initially prompted T-1 to look out of the window towards the WTC. It was at that time that T-1 had also observed the Israelis atop the white van. Since T-1 believed that T-2's call came immediately after the first explosion at the WTC, FBI-NK attempted to obtain the toll records of T-2's residential telphone [sic] with a view toward determining the exact time of T-2's call. Unfortunately, electronic records of local calls such as that are not maintained by the local telephone service provider; thus, no electronic 'time stamp' verifying T-1's observation of the Israelis could be obtained."


Source: Exhibit 1, Section 6, p. 49

Exhibit 1, Section 5, p. 58-60 shows that on September 24, 2001, when the Israelis had been in custody for 13 days, the FBI's NS-2C Unit from its National Security Division, which is based at FBI headquarters in Washington (see p. 31 at this source) sent a fax to FBI Newark ordering them to call off their investigation into the Israelis, to conclude that they were innocent of involvement in the 9/11 attacks, and to hand them over to the INS, so that any "immigration proceedings" could be conducted. In other words, some powerful person in Washington pulled strings to ensure a politically correct conclusion to FBI Newark's investigation, very much in the manner of LBJ's statement on Israel's 1967 sustained attack on the surveillance ship USS Liberty, that "I don't give a damn if every man drowns and the ship sinks. I don't want to embarrass our allies." FBI Newark were ordered to adopt the position of "We don't give a damn if the WTC collapsed and thousands were killed; we don't want to embarrass our allies." From that point on it was simply a matter of waiting for a deal between Washington and Tel Aviv, when the Israelis would be allowed to return home to Israel, in return for Israel making some hollow promise (again!) that it would stop spying on US soil. The FBI had to start with the conclusion and ignore the evidence, so there was no serious attempt to determine the time witness #1 looked out of her window, e.g., by finding when 1010 WINS announced the first plane crash.

"According to ABCNEWS sources, Israeli and U.S. government officials worked out a deal — and after 71 days, the five Israelis were taken out of jail, put on a plane, and deported back home."

After receiving those orders from Washington to call off their investigation, FBI Newark must have been relieved that there was "no electronic 'time stamp'" to determine the time of the phone call, and you can bet they weren't going to elect career suicide by looking into the timing of WINS' breaking news and putting that in their report!

(Naturally, any promise about stopping Israeli spying in the US was soon broken. On May 7, 2002, a group of Israelis were caught with a rental truck that tested positive for TNT and RDX plastic explosives shortly after midnight, very close to the Whidbey Island Naval Air Station, Oak Harbor, Wash., where the Navy conducts explosive ordnance training for bomb disposal mobile units. On May 21, 2004, Tamir D. Sason, 24 and Daniel Levy, 23, both of Metar, Israel, were caught attempting to get into the Kings Bay Naval Submarine Base, Georgia, without proper identification, prompting a nearly 3-hour lockdown. They'd supposedly been contracted by a moving company. Bomb-sniffing search dogs reacted positively to a briefcase in the cab of the truck, although no explosives were found. Submarines at Kings Bay are armed with nuclear ballistic missiles. It had been just the same after Jonathan Pollard was arrested, convicted and jailed for life in 1987 for spying and supplying Israel with US top-secret military information, which is believed to have been traded to the Soviets in exchange for the emigration of Russian Jews. For more than a decade Israel denied that Pollard was its paid agent, then "Israel apologized and promised not to spy on U.S. soil again". That promise meant nothing; the so-called "art students" were part of a massive Israeli spy-ring in the US in the twenty months leading up to 9/11/01. By 2014, Israel's spying on US soil was described as "unrivaled and unseemly", even though Israel's spokesman "flatly denied the charges". You can trust Israel's denials about as far as you could trust Bernie Madoff to look after his investors' life savings.)

It is not clear whether witness #1 noticed the High-Fivers on looking out of the rear window, or when walking out onto the balcony. If we suppose it was not until stepping out onto the balcony, that would explain how she never heard the news about the WTC on the radio. After the phone call ends, she grabs the binoculars and quickly looks out through the window. Then she steps out onto the balcony before 08:50:52 at the very latest. Allowing a few more seconds before she sees the High-Fivers, and adding another half-a-minute for the benefit of the doubt, that establishes that they were atop the parked van with their camera by 08:51:30, five minutes after the first plane crash, at the very latest.

Of course, there is no reason to suppose that they arrived, say, three or four minutes after the first plane crash. Since, as we shall see, they did not have time to learn of the plane crash, run out to the van, make a 5-minute drive, jump out, climb onto the roof with their cameras, etc., to be observed certainly within five minutes and probably within three minutes of the impact, Israeli foreknowledge is proven. (There is a wealth of corroborating evidence as detailed below.) And if they had foreknowledge, they would have been in place to film the first plane crash. Thus, the early reports, e.g. in The New York Times of September 13, 2001, that "a group of about five men were [...] under investigation in Union City, [and they] had apparently set up cameras near the Hudson River and fixed them on the World Trade Center. They photographed the attacks and were said to have congratulated each other afterward, [and were] suspected of assisting the hijackers [...] officials said]", were essentially correct. (Five Israelis were arrested on the afternoon of 9/11/01; three Israeli "High-Fivers" were seen celebrating at Doric.)

Exhibit 1, Section 5 provides testimony from witness #3, a painter who was working in one of the Doric apartments on the morning of 9/11/01, and was informed of the plane crash by his colleague. This was "Less than 5 minutes after" the first plane hit the North Tower. He stood up from painting the baseboard, looked out of the window, and noticed "3 young men taking video and still photographs from atop the roof of the parking garage adjoining Doric Towers". There was a white van next to the men.


Source: Exhibit 1, Section 5, p. 25

Witness #3 also says he "believes this occurred between 9:00am and 9:10am". He and witness #1 must have seen the High-Fivers at different times, since witness #1 saw them on the roof of the white van, whereas witness 3# saw them next to the white van on the parking lot on the roof of the parking garage. Five minutes after seeing the High-Fivers, witness #3 was in his apartment and saw both towers on fire. Six or seven minutes after that, he looked out of another window and saw that the High-Fivers and both white and brown vans were gone. It looks like witness #3's estimation of "Less than 5 minutes after the first plane hit" was wrong, and based on a belief that the first impact was closer to 9:00. So he is not really corroborating previous evidence showing the High-Fivers to have been at Doric five minutes after the first crash. If he saw them, say, a couple of minutes after the first crash, and then they climbed on the roof of the van to be seen by witness #1, then his estimate of "between 9:00am and 9:10am", and, more importantly, his estimate of "approximately five minutes later" when he looked out and saw "both towers on fire", are wrong.

The most likely timeline would appear to be that the High-Fivers took video footage of the first crash, witness #1 saw them a few minutes later celebrating on the roof of the van, they got down and were seen by witness #3 next to the van at about 09:00, then they took video footage of the second crash, and left soon afterwards (being well aware that a third plane would not crash in the next fifteen minutes).

Witness #3 corroborates witness #1's statement that the High-Fivers were taking both video and still photographs. The more incriminating video footage of the first impact would no doubt have been quickly offloaded, so that they were not in possession of it by the time they were arrested that afternoon by the East Rutherford police. The High-Fivers' mission that day was to obtain video footage of the two impacts; the still photographs were from when they were "horsing around" during the intermission, having fun, acting jovially, smiling, hugging each other, high-fiving, holding up a lit lighter in celebration, and so on.

Richard Armitage, then US Deputy Secretary of State, along with two unnamed "prominent New York congressmen", were amongst those trying to speed up the release of the five "Dancing Israelis" arrested on the afternoon of 9/11/01. Back in January 1998, Armitage had signed a Project for the New American Century (PNAC) letter to Bill Clinton, urging him to remove Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq. Other signatories of that January 26, 1998 letter to Clinton included Robert Kagan, William Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld and Richard Perle. The latter was the lead author of a 1996 paper entitled A Clean Break, for the attention of the accused Benjamin Netanyahu, who was then the new Israeli premier, that advocated the removal of Saddam's regime in Iraq. In June 2003, Armitage would be the first to leak the identity of the CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson, after Plame's husband Joseph C. Wilson correctly reported in March 2002 that an Italian intelligence report stating Iraq was trying to buy yellowcake uranium was based on bogus documents, yet George W. Bush repeated the yellowcake claim in January 2003 when making the case for war. The leaking of Plame's name was in retaliation for Wilson's honesty, and part of an attempt to deter any further critics - part of the vast body of proof that the administration's invasion of Iraq was not simply a mistake based on "faulty intelligence", and the warmongers could not possibly have been stupid enough not to know that they were lying.

Not only did Jewish real estate developers take over the lease for the Twin Towers and purchase insurance against multiple terrorist attacks a few weeks prior to the multiple terrorist attacks of 9/11/01; Israel set up a massive public relations operation in New York City, a few weeks prior to 9/11. Another of those working to persuade US authorities into going easy on the High-Fivers was Ido Aharoni, who told of how "the Israeli government [was] deeply concerned about their treatment", and said, "We haven't been able to get clear answers from the authorities on what is going on". Aharoni, who'd been "a member of Israel's Foreign Service since the summer of 1991", "assumed [the] position [of] Consul for Media and Public Affairs at the Consulate General of Israel in New York [...] several weeks prior to the terror attacks of 9/11". "As the head of the department, Aharoni oversaw the operation of Israel's largest public affairs and media relations apparatus worldwide" (how convenient that this should be based in New York City at the time of the attacks!). "While in New York, Aharoni became familiar with nation-branding methods, which he later introduced to his superiors in Jerusalem. This effort resulted in bringing about a paradigm shift in the perception of Israel’s public image by Israeli officials, in Israel and in the USA." (The 9/11 attacks themselves did that; as Netanyahu said, the attacks were "very good" for Israel. An "employee" or "member" of Israel's "foreign service" is a euphemism for "spy", e.g., in the case of Zev Barkan in Israel's infamous botched attempt to steal the passport of a cerebral palsy victim in New Zealand.)

Aharoni was a Project Team Member at the 2010 Herzliya Conference at the Interdisciplinary Center, for a working paper entitled "Winning the Battle of the Narrative", which admitted that (as a result of Israel's human rights record and crimes against the Palestinians and the Lebanese, and even after the PR gains from 9/11) Israel's international standing was in "dire straits". The paper defined "Creative Energy" as "the official Israeli Government concept of branding and repositioning Israel on the international arena, which steps outside the traditional boundaries of HASBARA". Here are excerpts from Israel's Hasbara manual: "Uncritical audiences believe something if they hear it first and hear it often. [...] Seven Basic Propaganda Devices [...] To effectively present Israel to the public, and to counter anti-Israel messages, it is necessary to understand propaganda devices." And they need this 131-page manual along with their internet campaign, along with all the organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), to defend Israel's reputation. Does Ireland, Iceland, Indonesia or India need any such thing? The Hasbara Fellowships was founded by Rabbi Elliot Mathias in New York City in September 2001. Yet another "coincidence"?

As we shall see, the necessary modifications to the North Tower, designed to ensure its total collapse from "office fires" in the event of a carefully targeted plane crash into the required floors, an operation that was conceived by and directed by the accused Benjamin Netanyahu between 1991 and 1998, were already underway by January 1998, and were completed later that year. Clinton had his faults, but even he didn't approve of the killing of 3,000 people as a pretext to go to war with Iraq (they had to wait for a dry drunk whose idea of 'fun' was blowing up frogs with firecrackers and shooting them with BB guns, and was described by Mark Crispin Miller as a "sociopathic personality [...] incapable of empathy" and a "very skilled manipulator"), and his blackmailers retaliated on January 17, 1998, when news broke via the Drudge Report, outing Clinton's affair with the Russian-Jewish temptress Monica Lewinsky. Clinton would have been vulnerable to blackmail by, for example, a "foreign embassy" that was tapping his telephones. Three days later on January 20, 1998, the accused Benjamin Netanyahu, who had a few more aces up his sleeve even though his government was in a weak position domestically, arrived in Washington for talks with Bill Clinton. The next week, the PNAC letter from Perle, Rumsfeld, Armitage & Co. put more pressure on Clinton to invade.

We'll look at the lies of the High-Fivers in a moment, but speaking of lies, Israel's apologists made a disgraceful attempt to spin the facts, either by exploiting witness #1's accent, or by manipulation of the audio. In a misleading TV documentary, they feature a clip where she appears to say, "...down there I see this van park. And I see three guys on top of the van". It is clear that she either said, or meant to say, "parked", since otherwise it would be completely at odds with her previous testimonies as documented above. For example, the FBI's understanding of her account of events could hardly be any clearer than "It was at that time that T-1 had also observed the Israelis atop the white van." And in the "park [up]" interpretation, the necessary intervening step of the three men climbing onto the roof of the van is conspicuous by its absence.

There are several versions of the video of "Maria" on YouTube, and it is clear that the audio was heavily edited by the documentary producers. Of the two cited below, the original ABC 20/20 documentary of 2002 has the better quality audio. That allows one to easily hear how the background noise level increases at the start of "And all of a sudden, down there I see this van park", only to go down again after the part where the final consonant (if she'd said "parked") might have been attenuated sufficiently to make it disappear. The shifting noise level is audible through laptop speakers, but better with headphones. If the audio had been deliberately manipulated to change the meaning, then introducing noise at that point would help to cover up the editing. There's an obvious click just before "I thought it was very strange", but nothing really suspicious about that. On the Channel 4 clip, a low frequency note is introduced into the background, just before the rise and fall of the noise level. So the change in noise level isn't so clear, but it's still audible on headphones.

ABC 20/20, June 2002: "I grab my binoculars, and I could see the Towers from my window. And this is where, you know, I'm looking. And all of a sudden, down there I see this van park, and I see three guys on top of the van. And I could see, that they were like happy, you know, they, they, they weren't, they didn't look shocked to me, you know, they didn't look shocked. I thought it was very strange."

The 9/11 Conspiracies, Channel 4 (UK), September 2004: "I grab my binoculars, and I'm trying, you know, to look at the Twin Towers. But what caught my attention, down there I see this van park, and I see three guys on top of the van. They seemed to be taking a movie, and I could see, that they were like happy, you know, they're laughing. They didn't look shocked to me."

Seeing a van park up would hardly catch your attention, when you're looking at a major incident involving smoke billowing from a skyscraper that's been part of the skyline for thirty years. However, seeing three guys on the roof of a parked van, taking video and still photographs, hugging each other, high-fiving, flicking a lighter in celebration, and generally looking happy and not at all shocked, just as a shocking incident had occurred; that surely would grab the attention!

The later clip from Channel 4 isn't simply an edited version of ABC's footage, since each contains excerpts not featuring on the alternative edited version. Channel 4 must have been granted access to ABC's recording, including the parts they didn't use. A listen to this 15-second clip of ABC's and Channel 4's versions superposed, beginning from "down there I see this van park", demonstrates that Channel 4 didn't do a second Maria interview after ABC's 2002 broadcast, as is erroneously claimed by pro-government sites such as 9/11 Myths. She wouldn't have said those seventeen words at exactly the same speed and frequency, along with the other identical clips, more than two years later. Thus, there is only the one instance of "park", and it's dubious, to say the least.

The trace below shows the word "park", with the noise level going back down at the end, well after the final consonant, and just before "...and I see three guys..." starts.


Of course, there could be some prosaic explanation for that increased noise level, such as the window being open just as that very part was recorded, along with sloppy mixing of video and audio. Taken in isolation, it's weak evidence for chicanery, and the witness may well have simply omitted that final consonant herself. However, by the time all of the other evidence is taken into consideration, and given all the lies and deception that occurred on the part of the 9/11 propagandists and warmongers, the possibility of manipulated audio should not be dismissed lightly. And it is clear that ABC was only too pleased to let Channel 4 have all the content of their interview with Maria, since ABC would have known that Channel 4 was trying to sell the same "the Arabs did 9/11" line as they were.

The so-called "debunking" sites that try to prop up the official narrative will take various pieces of evidence in isolation and concoct some argument purporting to refute them. They'll avoid the fact that they need to repeat this procedure hundreds of times for all the evidence pointing to fanatical Zionist Jews and government agencies as the perpetrators, they'll avoid the fact that they need to be selective about what evidence they present, and they'll avoid the fact that they simply have no credible evidence whatsoever for their "suicidal Arabs did 9/11" narrative. Their version of events is so riddled with absurdities and their 'evidence' so weak that it is readily dismissed as:

For example, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was reportedly killed in a Pakistan Rangers paramilitary raid on his apartment in September 2002. His identity was confirmed by his wife and child, and the body was buried under the surveillance of the FBI. An individual with the appropriate skin color, ostensibly Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, was captured on March 1, 2003 and subjected to "enhanced interrogation techniques" at CIA bases "Blue" and "Cobalt". These included waterboarding (183 times in a single month), "rectal rehydration", standing sleep deprivation, slapping and "stress positions". On March 10, 2007, the "KSM" individual made a statement at a military tribunal at Guantanamo Bay, 'confessing' to being responsible for the "9/11 Operation, from A to Z", the "1993 World Trade Center Operation", the "Shoe Bomber Operation", the "bombing of a nightclub in Bali" (October 2002, which killed 202 people but none of them were Israelis), "planning, training, surveying and financing the New (or Second) Wave attacks" against skyscrapers including the "Plaza Bank, Washington state" and the "Sears Tower, Chicago", being in charge of the "Cell for the Production of Biological Weapons, such as anthrax and others", and responsible for many other plots and operations.

Whoever fabricated this 'confession' was going for quantity, rather than making any effort to make it seem even half credible. And they overlooked the fact that "KSM" was captured on March 1, 2003 but the Plaza Bank wasn't founded until early 2006. And the anthrax strain was traced to the US military (but White House officials had been pressing the FBI to provide "proof" that Osama bin Laden was to blame!), and it was "movers" with Jewish names (described as "Middle Eastern") who were caught with a video camera and detailed video footage of the Sears Tower on October 11, 2001.

In any case, primary sources such as FBI reports take precedence over a politically motivated TV documentary, produced months after the event for damage control purposes when the political ramifications are fully understood, by Barbara Walters, a Jewish journalist, and John Miller, a journalist turned police and FBI "counterterrorism" 'expert', who was on such a mission to peddle the 9/11 official conspiracy theory that he interviewed Osama bin Laden as early as May 1998. Miller's father-in-law Arthur Altschul was a Goldman Sachs Group partner who was on the board of the United Jewish Appeal (UJA-Federation). Altschul's mother Helen Lehman Goodhart was the maternal granddaughter of Mayer Lehman, a founder of Lehman Brothers, whose timely collapse and role in precipitating the "Great Recession" in September 2008 gave Larry Silverstein some breathing space just after the 9/11 truth movement was hot on his heels in March 2008. Netanyahu's friend Silverstein, who served as chairman of the United Jewish Appeal and had an estimated net worth of $3.5 billion as of 2014, secured 12-layer, 22-company insurance to cover the WTC buildings against terrorist attacks aggregating $3,546,809,904 "per occurrence", and including property damage and business interruption, less than six weeks before the buildings were destroyed in two "occurrences" of terrorist attacks. After the recession, defenders of the official narrative would argue that Silverstein hadn't really profited from his multi-billion-dollar insurance payouts, because he would have trouble finding tenants. However, at the end of 2014 Silverstein, discussing "cool" tenants at Tower 1, "hugely important leases" for Tower 4, the $1.6 billion in funding he'd gained to build Tower 3, and his prediction that 2015 would be an "interesting year in the life of Tower 2", said he felt "pretty damn good" about the people coming into the downtown neighborhood (and by extension, the consequent prospects for gaining tenants).

9/11 was an "all or nothing exercise" for the Zionists. They couldn't afford to have Israel go down, and as we shall show, after Silverstein, the trail led inexorably to Netanyahu, Israel, and militant Judaics. Jewish bankers might not have staged the "Great Recession", but they certainly had the means, opportunity, and a very powerful motive.

There is no mention of the van parking up, or the men getting out and climbing onto its roof, in the ABC 20/20 report. And when all of the other evidence is taken into account, there is no longer any doubt as to Israel's foreknowledge and complicity. The Zionist-friendly version of events, in which suicidal Arabs pulled off 9/11 armed with box cutters, and the High-Fivers are merely innocents abroad on a "working holiday", is shown to be a total sham.

The 9/11 official conspiracy theory can quickly be rejected as preposterous, since it necessarily includes a glaring contradiction. Hani Hanjour was a "very bad pilot" who "could not fly at all", was refused permission to fly solo in a Cessna 172 in the second week or the middle of August 2001, failed a written driver's license test on August 2, 2001, and failed to make cash withdrawals on several occasions on September 5, 2001, because he'd forgotten his PIN, yet allegedly managed on September 11, 2001 to fly a Boeing 757 into the Pentagon's first floor at 530 mph, with the engines clearing the lawn by a couple of feet. Another contradiction is that Hanjour was regarded as a "kind and gentle man" who liked children, and was too timid to ask for a toothbrush, yet allegedly was a mass-murdering terrorist. Let's examine Hanjour's alleged aeronautics in some more detail.

As may be seen in the photo below, most of the pre-collapse damage was to the Pentagon's first floor. According to the ASCE Pentagon Building Performance Report (p. 35), "The right wing was below the second-floor slab at the fuselage but above the second-floor slab at the tip, and the left wing struck the building entirely below the second-floor slab, to the north of column line 14". The aircraft is said (p. 37) to have ended up on the first floor: "Impact damage to the structure above the second-floor slab did not extend more than approximately 50 ft into the building. This shows that the aircraft slid between the first-floor slab on grade and the second-floor slab for most of its distance of travel after striking the building". And "The story height was 14 ft 1 in." (p. 45). So according to the official narrative, Hanjour crashed a Boeing 757 into the first floor with the fuselage impacting the second-floor slab, which places the center of the fuselage at about 14 feet above ground level. It could hardly have been much lower without the plane digging up the lawn.



The Boeing 757 fuselage exterior width is 12 feet 4 inches and the fuselage height 13 feet 2 inches. With the fuselage center 14 feet above the lawn, the top is at ~21 feet and the bottom at ~7 feet. The bottom of the engines is about 4 feet lower than the bottom of the fuselage, making the engines some 3 feet clear of the ground on impact. There is then the fact that Flight 77 was rolled slightly to the left on impact. The inter-engine distance (center to center) is 41 to 42 feet. If the roll angle was just 5 degrees, the difference in height between the engines comes out at 41.5 x sin (5 degrees) = 3.6 feet; i.e. the port engine is down 1.8 feet and the starboard engine raised 1.8 feet. So this would leave the port engine 1.2 feet above ground level at the point of impact. Let's round it up to a couple of feet.

Hanjour descended 25,000 feet in 17 minutes which is 24.5 fps, but that includes a few minutes from point "F" in the chart below. The final 5,000 feet of descent takes about two minutes, which is 42 fps. The speed at impact was 530 mph or 777 fps, so it takes 6.8 seconds to cover the final mile. In each of the final seconds, Flight 77 travels 777 feet along the nearly horizontal trajectory (or hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle) and descends by 42 feet. That's 285 feet of descent over a mile, so Hanjour's altitude a mile out (going by the lowest point of the lowest engine) is 287 feet.


Source: National Transportation Safety Board

Suppose Hanjour has managed to get the correct yaw and roll at a mile out, and 'only' has to use the elevators to set the pitch to aim for a point two feet above ground level, give or take a couple of feet. At theta = arc sin (287 / 5280) = 3.11591 degrees, the bottom of the engines just touch the ground after a mile. At theta = arc sin (285 / 5280) = 3.09417 degrees, the engines clear the ground by two feet after a mile. So that difference of two feet over a mile corresponds to a change in the angle of descent of only 0.02174 degrees or 1.3 minutes. Or double that if it can be plus or minus two feet. In other words, for an observer at a distance of a mile, a circle of radius two feet has an angular diameter (or angular size) of 2.6 arc minutes (distance = 5280 feet and linear size = 4 feet).

Hanjour's alleged feat is rather like a very bad archer who could not aim at all; an 'archer' whose skills are so poor that he was refused permission to be in charge of a bow and arrow whilst people were present. The archer is then given the task of aiming and launching a missile to the Moon at 126,500,000 mph, which leaves 6.8 seconds during which he can make in-flight adjustments to the bearing. (For the sake of argument, we ignore relativistic effects, and assume the missile launcher is somehow capable of producing ~58,000,000g acceleration without vaporizing, poisoning, or slamming the hapless operator down towards the Earth's core, or making a tiny change to Earth's orbit. It also requires that the Moon has been shrunk to less than one-tenth of its actual radius, so that either way off the center is equivalent to the plus or minus two feet at a mile. The moon's angular diameter as seen from Earth is a little over 30 arc minutes on average.)

Unlike the hypothetical archer who could carefully line up with an eyepiece beforehand whilst on terra firma, and whom we assumed was not subject to external forces other than gravity, and could disregard the laws of physics when they weren't in his favor, Hanjour is being thrown about in a plane, buffeted by minimum lateral forces of ½g and peaking at up to 2g as he performs his descent and nearly 360-degree turn like an ace fighter pilot. And how does he know which point on the screen to line up with the target to finish with the bottom of the engines at a particular altitude? The idea that a notoriously poor pilot could do as Hanjour allegedly did on his 757 debut is risible.

(The magnitude of the centripetal acceleration is given by ac = v2/r. If v is 500 mph or 224 m/s whilst making the turn, that allows for some acceleration on the final run-up. The NTSB report has a 330-degree descending right turn starting at 9:34 and going on for about 3.25 minutes. 224 m/s for 195 seconds is 43,680 m of travel, and if that's 330 degrees, then a full 360-degree circumference is 47,651 m, the radius r is 7,584 m, the centripetal acceleration ac averages at 6.62 m/s2, and Hanjour experiences a g-force of 0.675g pulling him over to his left. But 270 degrees of the loop is relatively tight, and some estimates have a tighter loop and greater acceleration.)

Most witnesses agreed that Hanjour was a very poor pilot, a "pain in the rear" to his instructors because he was "not serious about becoming a good pilot", too "incompetent to fly alone", and "could not handle basic air maneuvers", etc. Although he had a pilot's license, his instructors at a Phoenix, Arizona flying school were so concerned about his poor flying abilities in February 2001 that they suspected the 'license' might be fraudulent, and expressed concern to FAA officials. Testimonies in favor of Hanjour's flying skills are few and far between, and certainly very dubious. His biggest supporter was Eddie Guigui Shalev, who claimed Hanjour was a "good" pilot, despite all the evidence. The fact that Shalev served in the Israeli "Defense" Forces in the paratroops regiment is itself indicative of Israel's central role and need to manage the cover-up in the 9/11 false-flag operation.

(As with the precision targeting by Flight 77, we could also discuss Flight 11's targeting of the North Tower, which was far from the random hit of some suicidal "Arab" terrorist who got lucky after being hired by a turban-wearing caveman. But we'll leave that for later.)

Similarly, as early as September 13, 2001, Don Radlauer of the Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya, Israel, published an "analysis" purporting to show that it would have been an "easy" task for the "hijackers" to navigate the planes. Radlauer was a self-professed "pilot who has accumulated many hours of flight over the Eastern United States". Then, six days later on September 19, Radlauer published a "report" in which he was "an expert in electronic banking and cash management, [who] qualified as a floor trader for the New York Futures Exchange". He showed how the insider traders would have profited by more than $15 million from the surge in put options on United Airlines, American Airlines, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., and Merrill Lynch & Co., and suggested they were acting "under orders from Osama bin Laden" and were "expert[s] in masking ownership of corporations and making covert deals".

Two hours' advance warning of the WTC attacks was transmitted through Odigo, an Israeli instant messaging company with offices in New York and in Herzliya, Israel.

As a command and control center directing the 9/11 conspiracy and the ensuing cover-up, Herzliya featured propagandists who were busy trying to sell the official line of "Osama bin Laden" did 9/11. In 2006 on his blog, Radlauer described himself as one of the "hasbara rebels" who felt that Hasbara was not sufficiently "proactive" (Radlauer's father Marvin in New York was an author and lecturer on business topics), and said he attended a conference in Herzliya entitled "Media as Theater of War, the Blogosphere, and the Global Battle for Civil Society". The speakers included Uzi Arad and Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev. It would be astonishing if none of the 9/11 insider trading originated from Herzliya, and from individuals who were "expert[s] in masking ownership of corporations and making covert deals". And if some of it did trace to Israel, that would explain why the media never reported on its origin.

During the accused Benjamin Netanyahu's first term as Israeli premier, Prof. Uzi Arad was his foreign policy advisor from 1997 to 1999. Arad served in the Mossad from 1975 to 1999, where his last post was Director of the Intelligence Division. In 2000, the then supposedly "ex"-Mossad Dr. Arad founded and directed the Institute for Policy and Strategy at the Interdisciplinary Center, where he launched and directed the Annual Herzliya Conference Series. In June 2007, Arad was barred from entering the US because he'd had two February 2004 meetings with Larry Franklin, who was sentenced to twelve years and seven months in prison on numerous counts of espionage, including passing on classified information on Iran to members of the Israeli lobbying group AIPAC. In return for pleading guilty and cooperating, Franklin's sentence was reduced to 100 hours' community service and ten months in a halfway house. Arad's ban is believed to have been quietly lifted.

The funny thing is that the likes of Miller and Walters will pretend to "investigate" the so-called "conspiracy theories", as if the results of their "investigation" weren't already a foregone conclusion. They are hardly going to admit that Israel conceived and orchestrated the 9/11 attacks, but what they will do is to insert several "gatekeeper" debates. They'll pretend it's not a question of whether Islamist or Jewish terrorists carried out the attacks, but they'll suggest that maybe the High-Fivers worked for Israeli intelligence, and they'll pretend that maybe Israel was conducting a spying operation in the US on Islamist terrorists.

This of course fails to deal with the many absurdities inherent in the Israel appeasers' crackpot conspiracy theory, such as:

If Erwin Schrödinger had been born about 70 or 80 years later, he wouldn't have needed to devise a thought experiment about a cat, a flask of poison and a radioactive source; he could have simply cited the case of the 'evil' "Arab" "suicide" "hijackers" who were capable of being dead and alive simultaneously - framed, alive and innocent in the world of rational folk, and dead in the parallel world of Israel's true believers!

The 9/11 official narrative has no credible evidence to support it, and the overwhelming evidence against the narrative is far too numerous to list here. However, the idea that the Bush admin could have pulled off 9/11 alone is balderdash. Nixon couldn't even get away with Watergate. If it was merely a matter of a rogue government perpetrating 9/11, the mainstream media and the opposition party would have had a feeding frenzy. Anthrax attacks targeting Democrats and tabloid editors, whilst having some initial impact, could never have warded off exposure for any significant time. Thus, in order to identify the true culprits, we need to look beyond Bush and Cheney.

Rather than break this up with many more screenshots from Exhibit 1, the reader may open a tab with the index at this page, and then click on the entry for the topic of interest. That will jump to the transcript on the page, showing where to find the information in the FBI report. Clicking the browser's back button will return to the index.

It's a 4- or 5-minute drive from the Urban Moving Systems office at 3 West 18th Street, Weehawken to Doric at 100 Manhattan Avenue in Union City at the best of times - and this was at around 08:50 in the rush hour on a Tuesday morning.


Source: Google Maps

Not only did each of the three High-Fivers give false accounts of their movements that morning; they all gave conflicting false accounts and abandoned their original stories. If we take the most favorable version of these varied accounts, and suppose that they somehow learned about the first plane crash whilst at the Urban Moving Systems office in Weehawken and then went directly to Doric, without getting stuck in heavy traffic on the way, or first going up onto the UMS roof, or stopping to get gas on route to Doric, it still doesn't work. They have to be at Doric to be seen kneeling atop the white van only five minutes after the crash, which leaves insufficient time for them to:

Let's start with Yaron Shmuel's accounts. When arrested, he told the police that "he and the others were on the West Side Highway (Route 9A in New York City) traveling northbound toward the entrance of the Lincoln Tunnel" at the time of the "incident" (see p. 4 of the police report and Exhibit 1, Section 5, p. 45). This is an obvious lie, since there is no way they could have got from the West Side Highway and crossed the Hudson river in time to be seen at Doric. Going through the Lincoln Tunnel to 100 Manhattan Avenue, Union City is a 10-minute drive "without traffic"; thus, they could not even have got to the entrance of Doric until after 08:56:30, even if they'd seen Flight 11 flying low overhead, had heard it crash 3.5 miles behind them from inside the van or were looking out the rear window to see it crash, and had inexplicably decided to cross the river rather than simply double back to where they could see it at closer range without wasting time. Shmuel later changed his story to claim that he arrived at work at the Urban Moving office "around 8:20 am, and only learned of the crash into the WTC from a co-worker". In a video produced years later, Shmuel is still lying when he claims Doric is "two, three minutes from the office", when in fact it's at least four or five minutes by car.

Sivan Kurzberg was caught in a proven lie. He said someone told him about the explosion, he looked it up on the internet, then went up on the UMS roof, then left the office with his friends, was stuck in heavy traffic, and "[s]ometime between 10:00 am and Noon", he and his friends "stopped at a parking lot (adjacent to an apartment building) to take more photographs". Problem is, he was seen at Doric - "stopped at a parking lot (adjacent to an apartment building)" - before the second impact at 09:03:02, and the witness looked out before the news had even been announced on 1010 WINS at 08:50:52. Kurzberg has adjusted his time in an attempt to compensate for what he knows would otherwise be a physically impossible story, but in doing so, his chronology is out by more than an hour. He is not going to be able to read about the WTC on the internet, go up on the roof, get stuck in heavy traffic, plus the other points listed above, in order to be seen atop a van at Doric before the news was announced on a local radio news station that already had one of its trusted account executive on the phone to the newsroom as the first plane crashed. And (in the absence of any suggestion that he went to Doric several times that morning) he cannot arrive at Doric more than an hour after he arrived at Doric!

Oded Ellner gave a different lie, and with a timeline that was distorted rather differently to Kurzberg's. Ellner claimed he'd received a phone call around 08:00 on 09/11/01 informing him that the first explosion had occurred. In fact, it didn't occur for another 46½ minutes. However, it is quite possible that Ellner did receive a call around 08:05 to 08:10 at the office, alerting him that the mission was still on. The cell phone records don't show a call around that time, but a local call to the office would have the benefit that the phone company didn't keep records of local calls.

When the FBI reviewed EZ-Pass records for 09/11/01, they found that "the Urban Moving Systems van used by the Israelis to travel from Brooklyn, NY (location of their residences) to Weehawken, NJ on the morning of September 11, 2001 passed through the Brooklyn, NY entrance to the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel at 7:48 am." It takes 16 to 18 minutes to drive from the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel to Urban Moving Systems' office at 3 West 18th Street, Weehawken. (Google Maps has added a few minutes in recent years, but we'll stick to their 2011 figure.) And the time taken to drive from the Brooklyn Battery Tunnel to Doric Towers, 100 Manhattan Avenue, Union City is similar at 15 to 18 minutes, albeit via an alternative route. Thus, if the Israelis had gone to Urban Moving Systems en route to the Doric apartment block, they would have arrived at work at approximately 8:05. Or they could have arrived at Doric a few minutes after 8:00. There is no evidence that the High-Fivers went from Brooklyn to Doric via the Urban Moving Systems office in Weehawken; they may have gone directly to Doric. But if they did go via the office, that would have been so they could receive confirmation that the plane crashes were imminent, without leaving evidence of having received a telephone call at that time.

In Ellner's account, he went on to get gas at a Gulf station, and then "in the company of his friends, traveled to another location in order to take photographs of the WTC". The claim about stopping for gas en route to Doric after the first plane crash was a lie, because "FBI-NK [Newark] obtained witness statements and a gasoline receipt from the Gulf service station where the Israelis had purchased gasoline on September 11, 2001. Investigation determined that the Israelis purchased gasoline at approximately 2:14 pm, which was subsequently corroborated by reviewing the photographs taken by the Israelis that day." And stopping for gas leaves them even less time to get to Doric for when they were seen. There was another witness who was working at the gas station, J&S Gulf, 1324 Willow Avenue, Hoboken, between 8 am and 8 pm on 09/11/01, who "stated that a white van belonging to URBAN MOVING came in for gas in the morning"; he "remembered that the driver had short, dark hair". However, he believed "that it was prior to the attack on the World Trade Center because after that occurred, every customer that day had something to say about the event and [he] is sure that he did not speak of the attack with the driver of the URBAN MOVING van".

On some points, Ellner is rather more forthright than the 9/11 planners would have wished, which makes it more likely that there was some truth to his story of receiving a phone call at 8:00, and he just changed the message from "the first explosion has occurred" to "the first explosion will occur" or "the plane crashes will occur" (and he would have received the call a few minutes later). He revealed that they went to Doric because the parking lot "gave them a view of the entire length of both towers". This is before the second tower was hit!!

As one of the High-Fivers admitted, "only one side of one tower is visible from the roof of Urban Moving". This is confirmed by the Google Maps Street View; the image below is from 2007. In 2013, a new building sprang up, whereas in 2012 and earlier there is just the tall, narrow building, and in any case, the WTC was over to the right. Looking southeast down West 18th Street is in the direction of the Empire State Building.


Source: Google Maps Street View, 2007

Here's the 2013 view, nearer to where ABC were filming in 2002 in the 20/20 documentary. That section of the street is one-way, and the High-Fivers had to go round the block before they could get out onto Willow Road en route to Doric.


Source: Google Maps Street View, 2013

But if we are to believe the Israel appeasers' version of events, only one tower had been hit, the flat roof or adjoining warehouse roof of Urban Moving Systems provided a perfectly good view of the north face of the 1,368 feet-tall North Tower at the top where it had been hit, yet the Israelis inexplicably decide to abandon their jobs and race off to a place where they can see both towers.

It was Ellner who later said on Israeli TV "we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily", and he made another statement (under interrogation) that gave away more than intended. He "apologized for appearing happy in the photographs", and "stated that Israel has been dealing with incidents like this for years. He believes that the United States will take steps to stop terrorism in the world."

Thus, Ellner already knew, before the second plane crashed, that the first crash was a terrorist act and it would lead to a change in US foreign policy, when innocent bystanders did not know any such thing. The Israelis were happy (before the second plane crash) because they believed the US would "take steps to stop terrorism in the world", now that it had experienced the sort of "incident" that Israel had been "dealing with [...] for years". They already knew it was a terrorist act, they already knew that the South Tower was going to be hit, and they already knew it was going to be a seminal moment that was worth "documenting", which is why they made the decision to go to Doric. However, since they had advance knowledge of the second plane crash, they also had foreknowledge of the first plane crash. The Israelis didn't decide to go to Doric after the first plane crash; their plan to go there was already sealed the previous day, when Sivan Kurzberg was seen at Doric posing as a "construction worker".

As may be seen on the map, the Urban Moving Systems office at 3 W. 18th Street was north and slightly west of the WTC.


Source: Google Maps


Source: FEMA 403 Chapter 1

The north side of the North Tower, which was hit by the alleged Flight 11 at approximately 8:46:30 a.m. on 9/11, faces somewhat east of north. Given that Urban Moving Systems was north and slightly west of the WTC site, the South Tower would have been obscured by the North Tower, but the north and west faces of the North Tower would have been visible from the roof of UMS. The following photo is probably taken from slightly east of north of the North Tower; its north and west faces are visible, and the South Tower is in the background to the left.



Thus, a vantage point such as the roof of Urban Moving Systems, if we imagine the perspective from a little to the west, would have been ideal for viewing the north and west faces of the top floors of the North Tower and suitable for "documenting" the plane crash into the north (or northeast) face of the North Tower. However, it would have been a lousy choice for anyone intending to "document" the approach and impact of an aircraft into the south face of the South Tower. And as Christopher Ketcham pointed out, during the 17 minutes prior to the second impact, innocent bystanders would have believed the incident was merely a terrible accident.

So our "innocent" Israelis, engaged in "honest toil" as "movers" on a "working holiday" in a foreign country, learn that an aircraft has crashed into the World Trade Center, race off to Doric where they can see the South Tower without any witnesses along the 1.3-mile route in the rush hour seeing a white van being driven like they were in the Monaco Grand Prix, and are high-fiving, hugging each other, flicking a lighter, visibly happy and smiling, telling jokes, etc., because of "immature conduct". Then they admit they went to Doric because it provided a view of the South Tower, but really made a mistake when they said that; it was simply a "coincidence" that they decided to go there. And they admit they were happy because they already knew it was a terrorist act and they already knew how US foreign policy was about to change dramatically, but didn't really mean it when they said that. And they lie about their movements that morning, in the manner of someone who would make up any "alibi" rather than admit that they were already at Doric as the first plane crashed, but that was really just another "coincidence". And witness #1 didn't really see them for quite a long time after initially going out and looking at the WTC, even though that is not what she told the FBI.

This is what Israel's appeasers are desperate to have us believe. However, when the five Israelis - the three "High-Fivers" plus Sivan's brother Paul, and Omer Marmari - were arrested on the afternoon of 9/11, they were found to be in possession of "airline tickets with immediate travel dates for destinations world-wide", passports, $4,700 in cash hidden in a white pouch, and maps with "certain places highlighted", described as "tie-ins" (evidence "linking these Israelis to 9-11" that was later "classified", so only appeared in an initial report), whilst "[o]ddly, equipment typically used in a moving company's daily duties was not found, including work gloves, blankets, straps, ropes, boxes, dollies, rollers, etc.". And when the three High-Fivers were seen in Liberty State Park around 11:00 am, the witness said of one of them that he "looked light, and didn't look like he would work as a mover".

Exhibit 1 provides more details of those "airline tickets with immediate travel dates for destinations world-wide", which shows how the High-Fivers had already planned - as early as June 2001 - to make their getaway to Israel the day after 9/11/01. Section 1, pp. 100/101 shows that they planned to leave the US from JFK International Airport, New York City on September 12, 2001, on Olympic Airways Flight  412 at 17:45 bound for Greece, whereupon they would catch a second flight to arrive in Tel Aviv, Israel on the morning of September 14. (The perpetrators could have foreseen disruption to civilian air traffic, such as a suspension for a couple of days, but they would also reckon that possession of tickets for September 12 should help their US operatives to get priority when flights resumed. And indeed, it wasn't Arabs in a cave, who couldn't afford a decent video camera, who profited from shorting airline stocks!)


Source: Exhibit 1, Section 1, p. 101

The Israelis had a Canon EOS SLR and a Pentax P550 camera with them on 9/11/01, despite the fact that they were supposed to be movers, not photographers. What's more, Sivan Kurzberg evidently received one of the cameras from his brother Paul on 9/10/01, the day before the attacks. From Exhibit 1, Section 5, p. 20: "...she does recall that [redacted, approximately fourteen characters, consistent with Sivan Kurzberg] had received a new camera from [redacted, thirteen characters, consistent with Paul Kurzberg] the day before [the witness had just described how the Urban Moving Systems workers went outside to watch on the day of the attacks on the WTC; thus, "the day before" is clearly the day before the attacks]." Page 22: "[Redacted, another witness who worked at UMS] said she thought [redacted, four characters, consistent with Paul] had recently bought his [redacted, fifteen characters, consistent with "younger brother" (Sivan)] "a really nice camera that had a big lense [sic]". Also, one of the cameras that Omer Marmari had seen being used on the Urban Moving Systems roof on the morning of 9/11/01 was one that had recently been purchased, ostensibly for a forthcoming trip to India.

Their boss, Dominik Suter, informed the Urban Moving Systems workers (as confirmed by Omer Marmari) no later than lunchtime on 9/11/01 that they were fired and the company was closing down, before he fled to Israel three days later. It might be understandable if he'd closed the company down after learning that his employees had been arrested that afternoon. But to tell his employees they were sacked at lunchtime, hours before the 3:56 pm arrests, is not consistent with an innocent moving company boss, but is consistent with the operator of a Mossad front that was directly involved in the 9/11 operation, and, by lunchtime on 9/11/01, had become redundant. Moreover, consistent with foreknowledge that the family might need to flee the US within a week or so, Suter's mother-in-law made a transaction on a Florida property on Friday, September 7, 2001, four days before 9/11, and one week before Suter and his family fled the US.

We are supposed to believe it was just a "coincidence" that our 'honest' movers on a "working holiday" happened to have international airline tickets to leave the US the day after a seminal event - "the event" which their "purpose was to document"! And it was just a "coincidence" that Sivan Kurzberg was given a camera by his brother Paul the day before 9/11/01, it was just a "coincidence" that Suter closed his company down at lunchtime on 9/11/01, it was just a "coincidence" that Netanyahu's friend Larry Silverstein insured for $ billions against multiple terrorist attacks within six weeks of multiple terrorist attacks, etc.

Marc Perelman of New York's Jewish weekly The Forward reported on March 15, 2002 that the FBI had concluded that at least two of the Israelis were agents working for the Mossad, and their employer Urban Moving Systems Incorporated was a suspected intelligence front. Perelman also tells on video that he was able to confirm that, according to the FBI, two of the five Israelis were identified as "Mossad agents". Christopher Ketcham says the transcripts of the Carl Cameron report on the Israeli spy ring were later removed from the Fox News website following pressure from Abe Foxman of the ADL, and replaced with the rather Orwellian message: "This story no longer exists".

The "two" confirmed Mossad agents (although surely not the only operatives) were the Kurzberg brothers. ABC 20/20 reported that Paul Kurzberg refused to take a lie detector test for ten weeks, and then failed it. He was "reluctant to take the test because he had once worked for Israeli intelligence in another country". In the FBI report, Exhibit 1, Paul is said to have worked for the "Jewish Agency", whilst Sivan's job in Israel had been hunting Arabs of whom the regime did not approve.

Witness #4 identified Sivan Kurzberg as someone whom he had seen in the Doric Towers apartment block "on the afternoon prior to September 11, 2001" at around 3 pm. Kurzberg, who exited the elevator at Floor 9, was posing as a "construction worker" who was working in the building until 7 pm that day, and was with a second man who was not one of the five arrested "dancing" Israelis. Witness #4 was "positive" that the man he saw was Kurzberg, and he'd also seen him briefly in the lobby on a preceding day, the Friday or Saturday prior to 9/11/01. On the morning of 09/10/01, the day before the 9/11 attacks, a tenant had unexpectedly moved out of the apartment building. It was odd because they'd paid through to the end of September, and had not given any previous notice of their intention to move. The move was handled by Urban Moving Systems.

"A search of Urban Moving Systems, Weehawken, NJ, revealed more oddities which caused the search team leader to characterize the company as a possible 'fraudulent operation'. Little evidence of a legitimate business operation was found. Evidence recovery agents did seize, however, sixteen (16) separate computer units used by Urban Moving Systems." Another report on this search of September 13, 2001 says, "The search, conducted on September 13, 2001, met with negative results concerning a video camera. Nevertheless, fifteen (15) computers and a network server were seized from the Urban Moving Systems office. FBI-NK noted the unusually large number of computers relative to the number of employees for such a fairly small business. Further investigation identified several pseudo-names or aliases associated with Urban Moving Systems and its operations."

A former Urban Moving Systems employee had quit "due to high amount of anti-American sentiment present among Urban's employees. The former employee stated that an Israeli employee of Urban had even once remarked, 'Give us twenty (20) years and we'll take over your media and destroy your country'." Another former employee, who'd worked on a moving van as a helper, reported that "The other helpers all seemed to be Russians, Hungarians and Israelis. They always spoke Hebrew in his presence. He also advised that these other foreign nationals and [redacted] of the company, [redacted] had frequent meetings in the company's office, and he and the other non-Jewish employees were never invited to join them."

Dominik Suter didn't have "precognitive" powers that allowed him to see into the future, in order to know as early as Friday September 7, 2001, that he'd probably have to flee the country in another week or so, and to know as early as lunchtime on 9/11/01 that his company Urban Moving Systems would have to be closed down. Sivan Kurzberg, Oded Ellner and Yaron Shmuel didn't have similar "psychic" talents that would allow them to know that the South Tower was going to be hit by a plane, sixteen minutes before it was hit by a plane, and to know that the events of 9/11/01 would prompt such a dramatic change in US foreign policy that they would be worth "documenting" and celebrating, and to ensure that they had their cameras, passports, thousands of dollars in cash and airline tickets for flights to Israel via Greece commencing on 09/12/01, so that (if they weren't caught) they could quickly flee the US after their mission was completed. They obtained their inside information because they were part of a false-flag terrorist operation that was masterminded by the State of Israel and took ten years to set up. Kurzberg had been to Doric on the afternoon of 9/10/01, and other Urban Moving Systems "movers" were there that morning, possibly so that one of the team could be installed in one of the apartments on the morning of 9/11/01. As it turned out, the pivotal events of 9/11/01 led to a "War on Terror" that would go on to injure 1 million US veterans including nearly 270,000 brain injuries, kill nearly 7,000 of them before we even count other coalition members and civilians, cost the US alone $4 trillion to $6 trillion, result in hundreds of thousands of excess civilian deaths in Iraq alone, displace millions of civilians, increase childhood cancers by five times and lead to terrible birth defects.

Similarly, the bosses of the Zim American-Israeli Shipping Company which moved out of the WTC on September 4, 2001, and was owned partly by the government of Israel and partly by the Israel Corporation, didn't have an ability to see into the future. And similarly, the new WTC controllers - who took over the lease for the Twin Towers and insured the buildings against multiple terrorist attacks per "occurrence" for billions of dollars, with a clause stating that in the event of terrorist attacks, the partners could not only collect the insured value of the property, but would also be released from all of their obligations under the 99-year lease, only six weeks before the buildings were destroyed in two "occurrences" of terrorist attacks - weren't psychics. Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy were close friends with five past, present or future Israeli prime ministers.

The accused, Benjamin Netanyahu, along with Ariel Sharon, Ehud Barak, and Yitzhak Rabin (who was Israeli Premier in the early stages of the 9/11 planning until being assassinated in 1995) were friends of Larry Silverstein. In fact, Silverstein's ties with Netanyahu were so strong that they "kept in close touch. Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein. It made no difference what the subject was or where Netanyahu was, he would always call, Silverstein told an Israeli acquaintance. Their ties continued after Netanyahu became prime minister [in 1996]. They met several times".

 Ehud Olmert was a friend and business partner of Frank Lowy, who fought in the Haganah and the Golani Brigade "paramilitary" (terrorist) organizations in Palestine in the late 1940s to establish the State of Israel. On July 22, 1946, Jewish terrorists disguised as Arabs blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, killing 92 people.


Source: Yahoo News

Jewish "paramilitary" organizations would happily stoop to an atrocity like that, to serve the Zionist cause. The act was described by then British prime minister Clement Atlee as "one of the most dastardly and cowardly crimes in recorded history", certainly a very fair comment at the time. He was not to know what would transpire in another 55 years. The Irgun terrorist group took responsibility for the attack (but shamefully tried to blame the British for not evacuating), and the Haganah initially pretended to condemn it. It was later revealed that the Haganah had approved of the bombing, and their supposed condemnation was nothing more than a hollow sham. Menachem Begin, the Irgun commander from 1944 to 1948, received a letter from Moshe Sneh, then head of the Haganah, with instructions to blow up the King David. It said, "At the earliest possible opportunity, you are to carry out the operation at the 'chick' (code name for King David Hotel) and at the house of 'your servant and messiah' (code name for David Brothers building). Inform me of the date. Preferably at the same time. Do not reveal the identity of the implementing body - either by announcing it explicitly or by hinting."

The "leopard didn't change his spots" after 1948, when world leaders were bribed or duped into sanctioning the annexing of Palestine into an illegitimate, apartheid State known as "Israel" that was controlled by, and a sanctuary for, Jewish terrorists. (Incidentally, all of Israel's prime ministers have been Ashkenazi 'Jews' of Khazar, Asiatic origin; they have no biological connection to the Biblical Hebrews, and no right to any land in the Middle East.) In 1954, an Israeli spy ring was arrested in Egypt. These Israeli assets had been assigned to attack U.S. and British interests in Cairo and Alexandria using firebombs. "Operation Susannah" is a typical example of false-flag terrorism in which the perpetrators aim to pin the blame on another party - in this case, Egypt and "the Arabs" - for political gain. The operation was unsuccessful, the Israeli defense minister Pinhas Lavon was forced to resign as a result of the scandal, and the incident became known as the Lavon Affair. For decades, Israel would not admit responsibility for the Lavon Affair. It took until 2005 for Israel to admit responsibility, when Israeli President Moshe Katsav publicly honored the surviving operatives.

Incidentally, Katsav was later jailed for seven years after being convicted of two counts of rape, indecent acts by force, sexual harassment and obstruction of justice. And Frank Lowy's friend and business partner Ehud Olmert was jailed for six years for bribery. It's a pretty good illustration of the sort of characters who rise to the top in Israeli politics!

On June 8, 1967, Israeli forces tried to sink the USS Liberty in a sustained air and naval attack that was clearly no "accident". Radio operators overheard the pilots reporting to their headquarters that it was an American ship, and Israeli pilots later admitted that they'd known the ship was American, but they were ordered to attack it anyway. If they refused, they were arrested. Not only did the Israelis continue attacking long after it was confirmed that the ship was American, but "The ground control station ordered the aircraft to attack and sink the target and ensure they left no survivors." The Israelis used torpedoes, machine guns and napalm rockets, and even went to the extent of machine-gunning lifeboats launched to save the most seriously wounded, an hour after the ship was confirmed as American. Thirty-four crew members were killed and 171 injured. Israel officially claimed that it was an "accident" and a case of "mistaken identity", which is just like someone caught standing over a corpse with a smoking gun declaring his innocence. The Liberty was clearly flying a US flag, it was a clear day with unlimited visibility, and the Israeli reconnaissance aircraft planes studied the ship for eight hours prior to Israel's attack. The White House deliberately covered up the facts from the American people because of the influence of Israel's powerful supporters in the US. Much of the details are in the Congressional record. Download this 252-page .pdf, and John Conyers (October 7, pp. 164-167) describes the "Findings of the Independent Commission of Inquiry Into the Israeli Attack on the USS Liberty". Those findings include: "That there is compelling evidence that Israel's attack was a deliberate attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire crew". (Alternatively, click on this link, select "set a date range", "date is", October 11, 2004, "go", and look for "Congressional Record Volume 150, Issue 130", which is currently the first result.)

On September 10, 2001, the Washington Times reported on the findings of a 68-page paper by the Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS). The SAMS officers described Israel's Mossad as: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act." As to Israel's armed forces, they said, "Known to disregard international law to accomplish mission".

In December 2002, Israeli Mossad assets posing as "al Qaeda" operatives were caught and arrested in the Palestine territories. The men were arrested two days after Israel's prime minister Ariel Sharon had alleged "al-Qaeda" militants were active in Gaza and Lebanon.

One of the FBI's wanted "terrorists" is Adam Yahiye Gadahn, who was indicted in California for "treason and material support to al Qaeda". His real name is Adam Pearlman, and his grandfather Dr. Carl K. Pearlman, a Jewish urologist and "strong" supporter of Israel, was on the Board of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). "Gadahn" frequently appears in "al Qaeda" videos broadcast through Dick Cheney's chum's "Arabic" channel.

The accused, Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu, is the son of the late Benzion Netanyahu, who was chief aide and secretary to Ze'ev Jabotinsky, the Ukranian founder and driving force behind the Irgun terrorist group. It is interesting to note that King David Hotel bomber Menachem Begin actually regarded Benzion Netanyahu as an "extremist". Benzion's Lithuanian-born father, Rabbi Nathan Mileikowsky, changed the family name to the Hebrew Netanyahu; these Asiatic impostors who migrated through Eastern Europe to Palestine from the ancient kingdom of Khazaria needed to make it seem like they were Hebrew "Jews" who had a birthright to a large part of the Holy Land. Benzion, who died in 2012, had a great influence on his son Benjamin; "Netanyahu soaked up his father's admiration for Ze'ev Jabotinsky and his doctrine". According to Benjamin's childhood friends, Benjamin "was always compelled to prove that he did not fall short of his heroic brother [Jonathan]". In 1998, David Remnick wrote in The New Yorker that "To understand Bibi, you have to understand the father". Even in 1996, when "Bibi" first became prime minister of Israel, he was already noted for having had a "20-year obsession with terrorism".

Benzion Netanyahu had taken his young family to the US because the Israeli universities were too left-wing for him. He was trying to peddle to a gullible audience the tired old canard about how Jews were constantly being "persecuted" because of their "race". Benzion's brand of Zionism was so right-wing that he didn't think Palestine should have been divided up between Jews and Arabs in 1948; he believed his group of Zionist (mostly Asiatic) 'Jews' should have been given present-day Jordan, too. And he regarded any compromise with Arabs as "futile".

Benjamin Netanyahu's father-in-law Shmuel Ben-Artzi was a member of the Irgun and the Haganah.

On the 60th anniversary of the King David Hotel bombing in 2006, Benjamin Netanyahu proudly participated in a two-day seminar commemorating the bombing.

In 1995, Netanyahu "predicted" that "militant Islam" would bring down the WTC, and later credited his father with the "prediction". This "prediction" did not come about because the accused had "psychic" powers. It was a consequence of the fact that in 1995, the accused Benjamin Netanyahu was already heavily involved in planning a false-flag terror operation that would bring down the WTC and blame "militant Islam" for the crime, a false-flag terror operation that would very quickly prove to be "very good" for Israel because of its effect on US foreign policy, and Israel would be "benefiting" from the operation for years to come. On the evening of 9/11/01, Netanyahu declared that the attack was "very good" for relations between the US and Israel because of how it would "generate immediate sympathy" and "strengthen the bond" between the US and Israeli people, now that the US had "experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror". In April 2008, when Netanyahu decided he'd like a second term as premier and wanted to remind his backers of how he'd helped Israel, he told an audience at Bar Ilan University that Israel was still "benefiting" from the "attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon" because of how the event had "swung American public opinion in our favor". Within a couple of months of 9/11/01 Omer Marmari, one of the arrested Israelis, had told the FBI that "Israel now has hope that the world will now understand us" (Exhibit 1, Section 3, p. 65).

In 1996, when the accused first became prime minister of Israel, a report was prepared, entitled A Clean Break. It advocated "removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq", "weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria", and changing the nature of Israel's "relations with the Palestinians, including upholding the right of hot pursuit for self defense into all Palestinian areas", which it described as "a justifiable practice with which Americans can sympathize". The report told of how Israel could "make a clean break from the past and establish a new vision for the U.S.-Israeli partnership". The study group involved in writing the report was led by Richard Perle of the American Enterprise Institute. A massive false-flag terrorist attack that would "generate immediate sympathy", and "strengthen the bond" between the US and Israeli people, would be the ideal trigger for making such "a clean break from the past".

In 1998 Philip Zelikow, a Jewish American writer and historian, co-authored an article which described a "transforming event" rather like "Pearl Harbor", which would "divide our past and future into a before and after". In another few years, Zelikow went on to become the executive director of the "9/11 Commission". Zelikow, however, did speak candidly at the University of Virginia on September 10, 2002, when he admitted that the supposed threat from Iraq was not a threat to the US or Europe, but a threat to Israel. In other words, the impending war in Iraq (already agreed upon by Bush and Blair) - and likewise the war in Afghanistan - was for Israel. Afterwards, Zelikow tried to pretend his words had been taken out of context, but his ploy was foiled when a transcript of the speech was made available.

In September 2000, Rabbi Dov Zakheim, who was CEO of SPC International, a company that produced "Flight Termination Systems" capable of electronically hijacking aircraft and steering them by remote control into tall buildings - or relatively short buildings like the Pentagon - at a range of hundreds of miles, was co-signatory to Rebuilding America's Defenses, a paper that wrote of the 'benefits' of a "new Pearl Harbor", and published by The Project for the New American Century (PNAC). Zakheim was nominated by Bush to serve as Pentagon Comptroller in February, 2001, and was sworn in on May 4, months before a plane smashed into the Pentagon's accounts section, destroying documents and outdated standalone accounting computer systems, and killing accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts. This occurred after the March 2000 public announcement that the Pentagon's finances were "in disarray" and almost $7 trillion of bookkeeping adjustments had been required in order to balance the accounts, with $2.3 trillion of those corrections lacking receipts. According to the official conspiracy theory, a "Muslim" hijacker, who couldn't drive a car or remember his PIN for withdrawing cash, and was described as a "very bad pilot" who "could not fly at all", flew a Boeing 757 like an ace fighter pilot at 530 mph into the Pentagon's first floor, with the bottom of the engines clearing the lawn by a couple of feet, after he'd been recruited by some guy living in a cave.

The lunacy of the "Arabs did 9/11" narrative and the fact that the planes were clearly operated by remote control was already known within weeks of 9/11/01, although it took a little longer for Zakheim's role to become evident.

Exactly six months after the attack, on March 11, 2002, at 09:38, the very time to the minute at which the plane impacted the Pentagon, Rabbi Zakheim was joined by approximately 500 co-religionists from 40 countries on the Pentagon lawn as they sang to commemorate the attack. Ostensibly, the gathering was supposed to commemorate the centennial of the birth of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson ("the Rebbe"). However, Schneerson's date of birth was April 18, 1902, which blows that 'explanation' out of the water. And in any case, if they were really commemorating the Rebbe, why gather at the Pentagon lawn rather than Manhattan, where he died, or Nikolaev, southern Ukraine, where he was born? The rabbis sang "God Bless America", for being such a good earner for them. Billions of dollars in profit for the Zionist cause was seen as sufficient reason to make an overseas trip to attend a celebration.

It is claimed that the Rebbe provides "moral" direction even for "non-Jews worldwide". Yeah, right, we're all eager to learn how to be better people by supporting or participating in terrorism, bombing, mass murder, war, torture, imprisonment without trial, unprovoked aggression, assassinations, forging of passports, bribery, blackmail, usury, occupation of other people's lands, high-fiving other people's deaths, theft, fraud, bestiality, rape, child abuse, incest, causing unnecessary suffering to animals, lying, deception, ethnic cleansing, use of white phosphorus on civilians, dumping of depleted uranium, use of bulldozers as a lethal weapon, obtaining advantages from "accidents", breaking promises for profit, piracy on the high seas, etc. - NOT!

Netanyahu was recruited into the elite Israeli special forces unit Sayeret Matkal in August, 1967, two months after Israel's attack on the USS Liberty. Netanyahu went on to attain the rank of Captain. After five years in Sayeret Matkal, he returned to the US, studied at MIT, and gained a B.Sc. in architecture and an M.Sc. in business management.

Daniel Lewin, one of the so-called "passengers" on Flight 11 which crashed into the North Tower, "loved jumping out of planes". One of the "hijackers" allegedly managed to kill him, even though Lewin had "often spent as much time weightlifting as on his schoolwork", could bench-press more than 300 pounds, squat close to 500 pounds, and "knew how to fight with knives and take knives away from people". More intriguingly, he attained the rank of Captain in Sayeret Matkal, was an alumnus of MIT, and had lived in Denver and Jerusalem. Given that Benjamin Netanyahu also attained the rank of Captain in Sayeret Maykal, was an alumnus of MIT, and had lived in Denver and Jerusalem, the chances of the two not being acquainted is close to zero. One of the so-called "hijackers" of Flight 11 was allegedly Abdulaziz al-Omari, who later turned up alive and well, and reported that he'd had his passport stolen when his Denver apartment was burgled in 1995. The Mossad's record of passport stealing is well documented.

Lewin, the co-founder and Chief Technology Officer of Akamai, was born in Denver on May 14, 1970. The Netanyahu family moved to the US in 1962; Benzion was teaching at Dropsie College, Philadelphia, until 1968, then moved to the University of Denver, and moved on to Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, in 1971. "Bibi" was born in 1949, thus, he and his father were both adults and Denver residents when Lewin was born.

Lewin made and lost a fortune in the dotcom boom and bust. In 2000 at age 30, he had a net worth of $285.9 million. Over the 18 months to July 2001, Akamai stock plummeted from $327 to $7.60, and was down to $5 by "summer 2001". Lewin was working so exhaustingly to try to save the company from the crash that he split from his wife temporarily and moved out of the family home to a bachelor pad. By April 2001, 180 people, 14% of the workforce at Akamai, had been laid off. Late on September 10, Lewin was working with Dr. Tom Leighton, then Chief Scientist and co-founder of Akamai, making grim arrangements to fire 500 workers, knowing that they would have to "downsize" another 500 afterwards, and then there would be the problem of morale and convincing the few who remained that the company still had a future. Leighton said Lewin was "emotionally drained" by the layoffs and agonizing over who had to go; he'd personally hired many of the staff and they were his friends. Meanwhile, Lewin had taken several trips to Israel that year; his parents Charles and Peggy lived there in Jerusalem. In the first week of September, 2001, they traveled to the US, arriving in Boston, touring Akamai, and walked around Cambridge. One evening that week after his parents had visited, Lewin called Jonathan Seelig, co-founder of Akamai, and asked if he could drop by.

Seelig recalled that Lewin seemed to have an unusual sense of peace about him. Lewin told Seelig that the visit from his parents, particularly the chance to see Charles in Cambridge, was monumental. He also told Seelig that he thought he’d figured out how to make his marriage work and that he wanted to spend more time with Anne and his sons. He stayed until past midnight, and when he left, Seelig had the distinct sense that something in Lewin had changed. “I remember him leaving and that I thought, ‘That felt really good,’” Seelig noted. “He seemed so grounded and stable.”


Lewin had made the trip to Los Angeles on Flight 11 more than thirty times in the past year; he knew the numbers of the best seats, knew the flight crew by name, and knew the makes and models of the aircraft. By just before 9/11, Akamai's stock was down to about $3. After 9/11, the company still had a very hard time; more layoffs had to be made. But the 9/11 attacks were exactly what Akamai needed. Web traffic surged by a factor of five for Akamai's global network of clients, which included major news media sites. And the company eventually flourished. Leighton and Lewin, a fanatical weightlifter who won the Teenage Mr. Israel bodybuilding competition, had developed David Karger's "consistent hashing" algorithm for distributing content from web servers more efficiently to cope with large amounts of traffic. By 2004, Akamai started posting annual profits. Given how Akamai was in such a bad way immediately prior to 9/11 and even after the 9/11 event, it's quite possible that if 9/11 had never happened, the company would have folded.

(We are supposed to believe that this bodybuilding Mr. Israel Sayeret Matkal Captain who knew how to "take knives away from people", and, in a recent paintball game, had carried his flagging Akamai team-mate Paul Sagan around over his shoulder "like a sack of potatoes", like he weighed "nothing", was killed by some weedy hijacker who'd been recruited by a caveman?? Perhaps the Sayeret Matkal should start taking lessons from turban-wearing, bearded cavemen and diminutive Arabs of slender build, in how to fight effectively and disable opponents!)

(And as Lewin's friend Marco Greenberg said, "Danny spent four years of his life tracking down these murderers." We are supposed to believe it's purely coincidental that Lewin spent four years of his life in an Israeli military elite unit that hunted terrorists, and then terrorists just happened to hijack not only the same American Airlines Flight 11 that he'd been regularly flying about once a week, but a plane that happened to have Lewin on board! Like it's supposed to be purely coincidental that Jewish businessmen took over the WTC lease and insured against multiple terrorist attacks, six weeks before the WTC was destroyed in multiple terrorist attacks!! And like it's supposed to be purely coincidental that Benjamin Netanyahu, the other ex-MIT Sayeret Matkal Captain who lived in Denver and Jerusalem, was a close friend of Larry Silverstein!!! What do they take us for, some kind of blind, deaf idiots who couldn't see or hear an elephant if it was in the same room?)

Apart from Benjamin Netanyahu's BSc in architecture, which is indispensible for a terrorist organization planning to take down tall buildings, his 1976 thesis for his MSc in business management, with Zeev Zurr of Tel Aviv University as co-author, was on "Computerization in the Newspaper industry". Netanyahu ("Nitay") wrote: "The integration process will be facilitated by advances in three areas: data compression, data base management and distributed processing. [...] Computerization may enhance the political power of newspapers by providing them with data banks and the ability to compile and disseminate pertinent information on issues or people at a very rapid rate." He continued: "The political power of newspapers is based on the ownership structure of the media. The Editor Publisher has from the days of Benjamin Frnaklin [sic] been a powerful political force precisely because he was both the source and disseminator of news. It is not clear whether this pattern will be altered by computerization. If anything it may be reinforced, because fewer people will be involved in production and even fewer people will engage in editorial decisions. Political clout is also based on the capability to hold public official [sic] accountable for past promises. In this respect, computerized data retrieval allows a kind of 'instant playback' to all reporters, not just the more enterprising and persistent ones." (Our emphasis.)

Again, this sort of expertise is essential for a global crime syndicate that is planning a major false-flag terror attack, and needs to shape public opinion worldwide and propagate a legend from mainstream media outlets. But it's not just the "ownership structure of the media" that's important; in the "computerization" age of internet news, the major news media sites need to be able to get their message (or propaganda) across to people without the servers crashing, and that's where Lewin and Akamai came in. How interesting that both Benjamin Netanyahu / "Nitay" and Daniel Lewin, the MIT-educated Sayeret Matkal Captains who both lived in Denver and Jerusalem, were concerned with data compression, database management and distributed processing. Yet another "coincidence"?

Lewin hadn't been pleased as a young teenager when his parents decided to move to Israel. According to Denver's Temple Sinai's Rabbi Raymond A. Zwerin, who was an Executive Board member of the Central Conference of American Rabbis, Daniel's father Charles was a "Zionist" who was "determined to live out his values in Israel". However, after joining the military, Daniel "fell in love with Israel". And Akamai's technology ensured that the major news media sites' web servers were using Zionist technology. By 2011, Akamai delivered 15 to 30% of global internet traffic, had 95,000 servers in 72 countries, and 2,200 employees. In November 2013, Dr. Leighton, then CEO of Akamai, visited Israel, met with Israeli president Shimon Peres, and presented him with a new book on the late Daniel Lewin. Akamai opened a new headquarters in Herzliya, Israel.

So, the conspirators decide to begin with Flight 11, which their star field operative knows so well. Lewin knows that he'll go down in Zionist terrorist folklore as a martyr who made the ultimate sacrifice like Jonathan Netanyahu, but even better, so that his beloved Israel would still be "benefiting" years later. 9/11 happens. And then:

Does this scenario - a win-win situation for the conspirators - start to make more sense than a cocaine-snorting, pork-eating, vodka-swilling, womanizing, gambling Arab who kills himself and many others because he thinks Allah will reward him with 72 virgins in paradise for being such a good, devout Muslim, and a "very bad pilot" who "could not fly at all", was too "incompetent to fly alone" and "could not handle basic air maneuvers", who pilots a Boeing 757 on his debut solo flight like an ace fighter pilot?

The Flight Call Notes show that Daniel Lewin left his wife Anne a mysterious voicemail message on Sunday 9/9/01. The message was a few minutes long and "in a foreign language". That's rather like the Jewish Urban Moving Systems people who would hold meetings at which they spoke in Hebrew, and to which the non-Jewish workers were not invited. Anne Lewin requested that the message be retrieved and recorded, because she wanted it as a "keepsake". She "kept stressing that confidentiality was very important to her." The Voicestream employee was also puzzled by the fact that Anne had made "many international calls" on the days leading up to 9/11/01, but "almost no calls" on 9/11/01 itself, when her husband was on one of the hijacked flights.



Source: Flight Call Notes, p. 18 of 73

Lewin was clearly the most obvious Israeli agent on the 9/11 planes. One of the Flight 93 "heroes" was Jeremy Glick, a Jew who'd been college judo champion, and described as "physically imposing", "standing just over six feet, with immense physical strength and the mental acuity to temper it [...] an amazing athlete." He spent ten months doing community service in Israel in 1991. That's just the qualifications for an Israeli Zionist asset whose job is to prevent the pilots from being able to regain manual control when the plane is electronically hijacked. Flight 93 was obviously supposed to crash into WTC7, but was shot down before it could reach its target because it was 41 minutes late due to airport congestion, and the confusion caused by the war games and exercises - effectively a military "stand down" - could not be maintained indefinitely. Rather than admit that, a Jessica Lynch-style "Let's roll" fantasy story about passenger heroics was concocted for propaganda purposes.

The New York Times told of how the WTC debris included fireproofing that had "melted into a glassy residue". And parts of a wide-flange steel beam from WTC7 that had been five-eighths of an inch-thick were found to have "vaporized" in "searing temperatures". The laws of thermodynamics dictate that net heat flow must be from areas of higher temperatures to areas of cooler temperatures; in other words, the heat source must be the hottest point, and everything else is cooler. Bizarrely, at the WTC, the extraordinary high temperatures were associated with the steel or the fireproofing.

Leslie Robertson, one of the top structural engineers responsible for designing the WTC, stated in a recorded speech that he saw "a little river of steel, flowing" in the WTC debris pile. Larry Keating said, "Sometimes the steel could explode when the buried ends were exposed to the air. You saw some of the thickest steel I’ve ever seen bent like a pretzel, and you just couldn't imagine the force that that took. The grapplers were pulling stuff out, big sections of iron that were literally on fire on the other end. They would hit the air and burst into flames, which was pretty spooky to see." Bronx fire-fighter Joe "Toolie" O'Toole reported seeing a crane lift a deeply buried steel beam that was "dripping from the molten steel" as late as February, 2002. There were numerous other reports of molten steel and molten metal found in the WTC debris pile. Wave dispersive spectroscopy (WDS) analysis of "a 40-lb chunk of previously molten metal from a larger 'meteorite' from the South Tower" found it to be abundant in iron, with very little aluminum.

Apart from on 9/11/01, no steel-framed high-rise in the US has ever totally collapsed because of fire. It has never happened before, and never happened since, yet on 9/11/01, there were three such cases on the very same day. One of the buildings was not hit by a plane, and in all three cases, the official narrative claims that the building's fate was sealed by the "office fires". Had the first two buildings collapsed as a result of aircraft impact, they would have done so immediately.

The WTC Towers were designed to withstand hurricanes, earthquakes, and a 600 mph impact with a jetliner. The exterior columns had "tremendous reserve strength", in that "live loads on these columns" could "be increased more than 2,000% before failure" occurred. Even the infamous Popular Mechanics publicized the fact that the WTC would "withstand winds up to 150 mph with no ill effects", although their moments of candor were in 1986 and 1993, long before the need for a massive cover-up.

The document below has some salient points regarding the WTC's structural design: "The structural analysis carried out by the firm of Worthington, Skilling, Helle & Jackson is the most complete and detailed of any ever made for any building structure. The preliminary calculations alone cover 1,200 pages and involve over 100 detailed drawings. [...] The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707 - DC 8) travelling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact." The notes also told of how the building had been designed for wind loads of 45 psf, compared to the New York City Building Code requirements of 20 psf as applied to the Empire State Building and others.


Source: NIST NCSTAR 1-2, p. 306

As government lackeys and Israel's groupies desperately wheel out their ragbag of lies and sophisms in a last ditch attempt to prevent the official narrative from unravelling, they'll try to suggest that the designers who carried out that analysis - with its 1,200 pages alone for the preliminary calculations - were too stupid to allow for the fact that the plane would dump its fuel load into the building. In 1993, the WTC's head structural engineer John Skilling was discussing his firm's analysis that showed the Twin Towers would withstand a 600 mph impact with a Boeing 707. He said, "Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed. The building structure would still be there."

If we forget the fact that no steel-framed skyscraper has ever totally collapsed from fire in the 100-year history of skyscrapers apart from on 9/11/01, and we decide to be generous to the official conspiracy theory by pretending that it's "normal" for such an event to occur once every 100 years, then the probability for three skyscrapers to collapse into a pile of rubble a few stories high on any particular day is 1 in (100 x 365.2422)3, which is around 1 in 48.72 trillion. Let's be even more generous to the official narrative. Suppose that any skyscraper that is hit by a plane is 100% guaranteed to collapse completely within 102 minutes, even though the Empire State Building survived, and the skyscraper has been designed to survive a 600 mph direct hit, and the plane that hits it is traveling at a lower speed, and is only carrying some 10,000 gallons of fuel, so that the impacting plane has a lower mass than the plane and 20,000+ gallons fuel load that the skyscraper was designed to withstand. In that case, the probability of a third high-rise collapsing that day, that wasn't hit by a plane, is 1 in 36,524.

That's before we count the forensic evidence such as partly evaporated steel (even melting requires at least 1,426 °C or 2,600 °F for the WTC steel, given its maximum sulfur content of 0.05%; the maximum of 0.3% carbon would barely lower the melting point to below that of iron's 1,565 °C) and melted fireproofing (NIST conducted measurements on the Blaze-Shield II to determine specific heat at temperatures up to 1,200 °C; any phase changes or decomposition would require considerably higher temperatures). And that's before we count the fact that within ten years, Larry Silverstein had made a clear profit of hundreds of millions of dollars on Building 7 alone (see below). And that's before we count the fact that the Chantilly, Virginia-based National Reconnaissance Office exercise of a plane crashing into one of its towers commenced at 9:00 a.m. on the morning of 9/11. If such exercises were carried out, say, every six months - which would further discredit the claim that no one had ever conceived of the idea that terrorists might crash a plane into a building - then the probability of such an exercise starting within ± 14 minutes of the first impact in a synchronized terror attack would be 28 in (60 x 24 x 365.2422 / 2) = 1 in 9,392.

We could go on and on, but given the official conspiracy theory's combination of chronological impossibilities, thermodynamic abnormalities, absurd contradictions, bizarre behavior and improbable 'coincidences', its chances of being true are zero.

Now that some of the evidence has been laid out, here is how the conspiracy evolved, as opposed to the asinine lies about cocaine-snorting, gambling, pork-chop-loving, Pontiac-driving, cave-dwelling religious zealots who decided to kill themselves and thousands of others because they hated Western "freedoms", and somehow managed to outwit all the intelligence agencies and the DoD, and topple three skyscrapers and destroy part of the Pentagon whilst armed with nothing more than box cutters. We shall explain the roles of the various players such as the "art students", the "moving companies", Dov Zakheim, Daniel Lewin, the Zim American-Israeli Shipping company, etc., as well as some of the disinformation that has been disseminated by defenders of the official narrative.

In 1991, Israeli security officials noted that the Israeli-owned Zim American-Israeli Shipping company's underground garage in the WTC was vulnerable to a truck bomb. (Interestingly, this was not long after the November 1989 collapse of the Berlin Wall and subsequent talk about a "peace dividend". Covert forces were soon hard at work manufacturing a new "enemy"!) In February 1993 a truck bomb exploded in the Secret Service's section of the underground car park beneath the North Tower (WTC1), after an FBI supervisor had called off a plan to substitute harmless powder for the explosives. The conspirators included a Mossad mole and an FBI informant.

The bombing served to provide a pretext for fireproofing (Sprayed Fire Resistant Material) "upgrades". Officially, the SFRM used for the upgrades was supposed to be Cafco Blaze-Shield II, originating from Isolatek in Stanhope, New Jersey. However, all the evidence is consistent with embedded accelerants in the upgraded fireproofing on the targeted floors, and indicative of a plan to substitute a lethal fake for the harmless fireproofing. The fake SFRM, almost certainly of Israeli manufacture and shipped via Zim Shipping, would heat, rather than protect, the steel floor trusses.

For WTC1, there is not only a remarkable correlation between the upgraded floors and the impact zone; there is an exact match between upgraded SFRM of high density and impact zone. FEMA 403 Chapter 2 describes the WTC1 impact zone as floors 94-98. Flight 11 not only crashed into floors 94-98 of WTC1, which was at the very center of the contiguous floors 92-100 that had "upgraded" SFRM, but it was revealed by NIST NCSTAR 1-6A, Table 4-2 that pre-2001, post-upgrade measurements showed the upgraded SFRM on floors 94-98 had different characteristics compared to the remaining upgraded SFRM - higher density, high adhesion/cohesion, and a higher thickness.


For full details, see here.

The accused, Benjamin Netanyahu, is a BSc-qualified architect and had access to blueprints of the WTC - either from his close friend Larry Silverstein, who built the original WTC7 in 1987, or from Lewis M. Eisenberg, a member of the Planning Board of UJA/United Jewish Federation and the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey who was to oversee the privatization of the WTC, after making decisions such as whether to upgrade the SFRM. Ergo, Netanyahu had the skills and the information that would enable him to calculate that it was necessary to take out five contiguous floors (see here, or NIST's Appendix D, Interim Report on Preliminary Stability Analysis, D.4.1) in a Tower before the lack of bracing would raise the slenderness ratio of enough core columns above the critical slenderness ratio, such that Euler buckling and global collapse of the tower would ensue. (The slenderness ratio is the effective length of the column divided by its radius of gyration, the latter being its effective width.) By arranging for a lethal fake "fireproofing" to be installed on five contiguous floors, and by targeting a plane to crash into those very floors so that the atomized jet fuel would deflagrate, igniting office fires that continued to burn after any pools of jet fuel had been consumed in the first few minutes, the neocon Likudniks and militant Judaists could achieve their objective of a spectacular show for the cameras.

The SFRM replacements were performed on floors that became vacant. Deloitte & Touche (formerly Deloitte Haskins & Sells) was badly disrupted by the February 1993 WTC bombing, and had to move elsewhere. In June of that year, Deloitte announced that they would not be returning to the WTC; they had been planning to move out even before the bombing, and it "did not make sense" to return only to move away again later. The Port Authority was left with "about seven and a half floors of prime space in Tower One" (which included the entire impact zone floors 94-98) for which they needed new tenants. This became the "last large block of contiguous space available in the complex". Thus, as early as June 1993, the demolition planners had their required five contiguous floors 94-98 of WTC1 in which the fake "fireproofing" would be fitted. Those very floors were to be targeted by an aircraft in the ensuing false-flag terror operation, and they would "blame it on the Muslims, naturally". Since the perps didn't have the required five contiguous tenant-free floors for SFRM replacement in WTC2, it's not so clear how that demolition was done, but it involved targeting more floors. Flight 175 which hit WTC2 had a roll angle of 38° give or take a few degrees, compared to 25° for Flight 11. The WTC1 plane's main damage area spanned five floors and the WTC2 plane's spanned seven floors. An orange-yellow flow of tons of molten material was recorded pouring from, as NIST wrote, "the top of a window on the 80th floor of WTC 2, four windows removed from the east edge on the north face".

(To calculate the damage zone's number of floors given the roll angle, multiply 127 feet by the sine of the roll angle, add six feet, divide by twelve and take the nearest integer, and that gives the number of floors of the impact damage zone. The two data points for 25° and 38° indicate that the diagonal length of the damage zone is ~127 feet. The wingspan is 156 feet 1 inch, but the final 15 feet or so each side to the wingtips does little damage. The floor height is 12 feet and we suppose the damage area is about 3/4 of the way to the bottom of the lowest floor and about 3/4 of the way to the top of the highest floor in the damage zone. Thus, an impact damage zone height of 18 feet counts as two floors, 30 feet as three floors, etc. The plane that crashed into WTC1 not only hit the exact center of the upgraded 92-100 floors, and hit the very floors 94-98 where the SFRM measured differently compared to the other upgraded SFRM; the plane's roll angle on impact also happened to be 25° so that the impact zone encompassed the required number of floors - five.)

Following the 1993 WTC bombing, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Port Authority or PANYNJ) made the decision to upgrade the SFRM. On p. 5 of this NIST briefing, it states "PANYNJ's decision to upgrade fireproofing around 1995". NIST NCSTAR 1-6A, p. 117, tells of how the Port Authority performed a study in 1995 to determine the thickness of SFRM to be applied to the floor trusses during major renovations. They concluded that 1½ inches was necessary to achieve a 2 hour fire rating. 1995 is the same year that the accused, Benjamin Netanyahu, "predicted" that "militant Islam" would bring down the WTC.

The upgrade for floors 94 to 98 of WTC1 commenced shortly before December 1996 and was completed by November 1998. As we shall show, the moving market in New York was already dominated by Israeli companies as early as 1988. Urban Moving Systems, the Israeli Mossad front, was operating in New Jersey and New York for years prior to 2001, and was registered in New Jersey in April 1997.

The upgrades were carried out on individual floors as and when tenants vacated their office space. Floors 94 to 98 of WTC1 were all fully upgraded, which included removal of existing material.


Source: NIST NCSTAR 1-6A, p. xxxvii


Source: NIST NCSTAR 1-6A, Table 4-2

The information from NIST's Table 4-2 is tabulated below to show the mean values for average SFRM thickness, cohesion adhesion, and density. For a "repeated test", both values are counted. It can be seen that for WTC1, floors 94-98 all have an average measured SFRM density of 19.5 lb/ft3 or higher, and the remaining floors are all 19.0 lb/ft3 or lower with the exception of the 1997 report for the multiple tenant floor 85. The density is quite low in the 1999 measurements for floor 85, and some of the fake SFRM that was left over following the 1996 renovation to floor 94 may have been applied to a section of floor 85 in 1997.

WTC Tower Floor No. Location Date of Report Average SFRM thickness (in.) Adhesion/cohesion (psf) Density (pcf)
1 79 Multiple tenant floor 11/24/99 2.4 333 16.6
1 81 Multiple tenant floor 10/24/96 2.7 270 19.0
1 81 Multiple tenant floor 7/16/99 2.6 377 17.5
1 83 Suite 8331 12/15/99 2.2 259 16.0
1 85 Multiple tenant floor 12/24/97 3.1 210 23.7
1 85 Multiple tenant floor 6/12/99 2.9 278 15.8
1 85 Suite 8563 8/16/99 2.8 259 16.4
1 92 Full floor 4/2/97 2.9 348 17.9
1 93 Full floor 8/28/98 2.1 186 17.0
1 94 Full floor 12/27/96 4.1 426 20.6
1 95 Full floor 8/24/98 2.6 258 19.5
1 96 Full floor 10/22/98 3.1 366 20.0
1 97 Full floor 10/22/98 2.3 432 23.5
1 98 Full floor 11/19/98 2.7 425 22.6
1 99 Full floor 11/20/98 2.4 210 17.9
1 100 Full floor 11/20/98 3.1 296 17.9
1 102 Full floor 9/28/99 2.8 327 16.4
2 77 Full floor 6/9/98 2.5 282 18.7
2 78 Full floor 4/3/98 2.7 279 17.6
2 88 Full floor 7/5/00 2.1 219 16.3
2 89 Full floor 5/5/99 2.8 324 17.8
2 92 Full floor 2/26/98 2.8 333 20.2
2 99 Half floor 7/28/97 2.6 284 21.1
2 99 Half floor 4/3/98 1.8 288 20.7

The official narrative claims that the fireproofing was "blown off" or "dislodged" by the impact of the planes. This is nonsense, because the amount of "dislodged" SFRM would have been far too minimal to have any significant effect on the ability of the fires to heat the steel. Not enough of the Cafco Blaze-Shield on the trusses would have been compromised - over a sufficient number of floors, and a sufficient area on each of those floors - for the effect of the fires to have been enough to tip the balance from survival to catastrophic collapse. The floor trusses originally had ¾ inch of SFRM. By September 2001 the entire impact zone of WTC 1 (floors 92 to 99) had been upgraded; the specified minimum was 1½ inches with Blaze-Shield II. However, at 2.1 to 4.1 inches, the SFRM considerably exceeded that specification. The measured cohesion / adhesion strength also exceeded the 150 psf specification, ranging from 186 to 432 psf. It also had a compressive strength of 2,380 psf.

According to Civil Engineering Magazine, May 2002, "Preliminary calculations suggest that the resulting overpressures [from the fireballs] were less than 1 lb per square inch (PSI)...It is likely that the force of the impact and the speed with which debris travelled through the structures compromised the sprayed-on fire protection of some of the steel members in the immediate areas of the impact." And FEMA 403, Chapter 2, 2-24, said, "The force of the impact and the resulting debris field and fireballs probably compromised spray-applied fire protection of some of the steel members in the immediate area of impact. The exact extent of this damage will probably never be known..."

The overpressure from the hydrocarbon deflagration is "less than 1" psi, i.e. less than 144 psf, which is below even the minimum 186 psf adhesion / cohesion for floor 93. That is too low to blow off the fireproofing.

It is fair to say that some of the SFRM on some trusses in the immediate impact area was compromised by debris. The Boeing 767-200 series has a fuselage diameter of about 16.5 feet (5.03 m), i.e. less than one-tenth the width of each Tower, and less than one and a half floors in height. The main damage area in WTC 1 would have been a rectangular section of some 17 feet in width and 60 feet in length from the north face to the core, and much of this tiny proportion of two or three floors would have been already destroyed by the impact. Flight 11 had a descent angle of about 10 degrees, so 68 feet horizontally - taking it into the core - would correspond to a 12 feet height drop which makes for an extra floor albeit at reduced length of damage zone. The west, south and east sides would have undergone relatively little damage in the inter ceiling-floor zone, as would the floors above and below. The official "office fires" collapse theory requires total collapse and removal of at least five floors, which would not have happened in 102 minutes with almost all of the truss SFRM remaining even on the worst floors. Each WTC floor nominally had about 56 tons of fireproofing (those upgraded floors, especially floors 94 to 98, had more), so over three floors at 168 tons it was more massive than the plane and its fuel. The Blaze-Shield would not have been "blown" off the trusses.

Since the impacting debris (from Flight 11) was approaching at a descent angle of about ten degrees, most of the trusses were shielded from this by four inches of solid concrete. Where the debris did not smash its way through the concrete, most of the SFRM on the trusses would have remained intact. The height of the trusses was 29 inches, so from 29 inches / tan [10 degrees] we have 164 inches, say 14 feet, as the length of the strip where the truss bottom chord might have had its SFRM compromised in places, beyond the extent of the smashed concrete. The width of the strip is 17 feet, from the diameter of the plane fuselage, so 14 x 17 feet is 238 square feet. At 208 feet by 208 feet, each floor was 43,264 square feet, so the area of possibly partially compromised bottom chord SFRM is ~0.55% of the total floor area. Wing debris (from part of a single wing for a given floor due to the aircraft roll of about 25 degrees), and debris bouncing off a floor and smashing through ceiling tiles (which were 2 psf), could have added a little, but the fire-induced collapse theory still doesn't fly. For global collapse to occur, total failure of five floors is required, which isn't going to happen from office fires when the extent of damaged fireproofing is some 1% of the total 43,264 ft2 floor area, for only two or three floors.

NIST carried out shotgun tests (NIST NCSTAR 1-6A, Appendix C) in an attempt to show that there was sufficient energy from impacting debris to dislodge the fireproofing. Their tests found that they needed a mean kinetic energy per unit impact area of 762 kJ/m2. If the mass of the Flight 11 Boeing 767 with fuel is 121,000 kg and the impact velocity 208 m/s (465 mph), the initial kinetic energy is (0.5 x 121000 x 2082 =) 2.617 GJ over floors 94-98 which is 523.5 MJ per floor. A 2005 study by Karim and Fatt using LS-DYNA found that "about 46% of the total initial kinetic energy of the aircraft is absorbed in damaging the exterior columns and the aircraft", which leaves 283 MJ per floor. Each floor had some 56 tons of fireproofing. (That's based on 2.8 psf outside the core, from NIST's June 2004 Progress / Interim Report, Appendix D, Table D-2, and assuming a lower figure of 2 psf within the core. The core is 137 x 87 feet = 11,919 ft2; the total area per floor is 208 x 208 feet = 43,264 ft2; the area outside the core is therefore 31,345 ft2. So 2.8 x 31345 + 2 x 11919 = 111,604 lb = 55.8 tons.)

Within the WTC1 impact zone of floors 94-98, the average SFRM density and applied thickness is 21.24 pcf or 340.2 kg/m3 (41.6% higher than standard) and 2.993 inches (99.5% over specified thickness) respectively. There would have been much more than 56 tons of SFRM on each of those impact floors, and NIST's average of 56 tons for a typical floor should be divided by a typical (non-upgraded) density and thickness. So we divide 112,000 lb into 15 pcf, which places the volume of SFRM per floor at 7,467 ft3. The nominal sprayed thickness was 1.5 inches; the over-thick upgraded zone was ~3 inches thick, and a typical thickness was about 2 inches. Thus, the area of fireproofing per floor is 7467 x 12 / 2 = 44,800 ft2, which is not far off the actual floor area. The available kinetic energy per unit impact area per floor is therefore 283 MJ / 44,800 ft2 = 6.32 kJ/ft2 = 68.0 kJ/m2, which is an order of magnitude short of the 762 kJ/m2 required to dislodge the SFRM in NIST's shotgun tests. That's before allowing for other energy sinks such as damaging core columns, partitions, shunting furniture, and landing gear that continued to the junction of West and Rector Streets. Moreover, the cohesion /adhesion for floors 94 to 98 was also relatively high at an average of 381.5 psf, which is 27.9% above the 298.2 psf mean for upgraded floors in Table 4-2.

(The operational empty weight of a Boeing 767-200ER is a little over 80 tonnes. If we add 100 kg apiece for 81 passengers and their baggage, the total is 90 tonnes plus 10,000 gallons of fuel at 3.1 kg/gal which is 31 tonnes, for a total of 121,000 kg or 266,757 lb. Incidentally, that's well short of the 336,000 lb maximum take-off weight of the 707. Defenders of the official narrative claim the Boeing 707 was a lighter plane than the 767 because the 767's maximum take-off weight is 395,000 lb, the WTC was only designed to survive an impact with a 707, and therefore could not survive an impact with a 767. Since Flight 11's weight on 9/11/01 was less than 336,000 lb let alone 395,000 lb, their argument is invalid. Also see the comparison at this page. And all that's before counting Flight 11's relatively low impact velocity, compared to the 607 mph of the 707!)

Apart from that, "office fires" don't bring down steel-framed high-rises, they don't produce an orange-yellow flow of tons of molten material pouring out of the windows that is indicative of an iron-rich melt, consistent with a temperature of around 1,000 °C or more, and totally at odds with the "office fires" scenario, and they don't leave tons of molten iron and steel in a pile of debris. "Office fires" don't leave heavily sulfidated, partly evaporated steel members with a Swiss cheese appearance, especially from a building such as WTC7 where there was no plane to dislodge the fireproofing. Neither do underground fires that have been smothered with tens of thousands of tons of concrete dust, hosed with three million gallons of water and exposed to another million gallons of rain all within the first ten days, and sprayed with thousands of gallons of the fire retardant foaming agent Pyrocool FEF. When such fires are subjected to "a nearly constant jet of water" sprayed on them that effectively creates a "giant lake", they should not mysteriously continue to burn for more than three months. It took a mere twelve-and-a-half minutes using 500 gallons of Pyrocool FEF to extinguish the Nassia oil tanker fire near Instanbul, Turkey.

Here's the orange-yellow, flowing, molten material from WTC2, seen in the final few minutes before the building collapsed:


And here's what molten aluminum looks like when it's poured:



Thermite's molten iron product is initially white-hot, turning to yellow and orange as it cools. Here's what it looks like:



NIST's engineers could hardly pretend to have failed to spot the difference, and so NIST published an FAQ that included: "11. Why do some photographs show a yellow stream of molten metal pouring down the side of WTC2 that NIST claims was aluminum from the crashed plane although aluminum burns with a white glow?" In their answer to this question, NIST claimed that "the source of the molten material was aluminum alloys from the aircraft", and deceptively attempted to 'explain' the orange-yellow appearance by postulating molten aluminum mixed with burning organic debris. They said, "Pure liquid aluminum would be expected to appear silvery. However, the molten metal was very likely mixed with large amounts of hot, partially burned, solid organic materials (e.g., furniture, carpets, partitions and computers) which can display an orange glow, much like logs burning in a fireplace. The apparent color also would have been affected by slag formation on the surface."

NIST's associate professor Michael Ware conducted an experiment that attempted to reproduce the orange-yellow melt using aluminum, but NIST's attempt to back up their claim by experiment failed. When paper, carpet, plastic, wood and melted glass were mixed in the molten aluminum and the material was poured out, the flowing material still had a silvery appearance in daylight conditions. The experiment was also carried out by Dr. Steven E. Jones, who observed the same silvery flow, confirming that burning debris could not impart an orange glow to all of the molten aluminum.

So proponents of the official narrative are in the unenviable position of having to peddle a pretense that it was aluminum alloys from the aircraft that melted in the office fires. The plane that crashed into the Empire State Building didn't melt, neither did the building collapse. But then, 1945 preceded the creation of "Israel" by three years, the King David Hotel bombing by one year, and Larry Silverstein didn't insure the Empire State Building six weeks prior to the crash!

More importantly, molten aluminum has that silvery appearance unless it is superheated way beyond its melting point, which wouldn't happen in an office fire, because as soon as it melted it would flow away from the heat source. Another problem is that aluminum has a low emissivity of only about 0.1, which does make it useful as a reflector in infra-red heaters, but in daylight conditions it would still appear silvery, even if it was heated to ~1,000 °C. The low emissivity also means it would take too long to absorb radiant heat for its temperature to approach the gas temperatures of the fires, so would barely get above its melting point even if a floor slab had inexplicably bent along two axes to form a three-dimensional dip for the melt to pool into, and it would not melt in such quantities as was observed pouring from the window. Moreover, NIST admitted that the aluminum alloys from the aircraft would have melted at lower temperatures "between 475 degrees Celsius and 640 degrees Celsius (depending on the particular alloy)". And there is a contradiction in the official narrative's requirements for the aluminum from the plane to shred itself miraculously into "magic bullets" which change course - without losing any kinetic energy! - in order to rip the fireproofing from all sides of the steel members, and then to reform into thin plates with a large surface area that settle facing the flames or upper gas layer for maximum absorption of radiant heat.

In 2008, NIST produced a report on the WTC7 collapse. The report, which had taken NIST years to complete, alleged that "thermal expansion" of fireproofed floor beams under Floor 13 was responsible for failure of a critical girder between columns 79 and 44, which brought about a cascade of floor failures, which in turn initiated failure of a single critical column (79), which in turn precipitated global collapse of the building into its footprint. However, NIST had admitted in 2004 that the fires on Floor 12, below the beams that they would later go on to allege were the cause of the building completely collapsing, were all burned out by 4:45 pm. In fact, the east end fire there had burned out before 4:00 pm. When NIST's collapse theory requires that the beams were expanding because fires were heating them, they would in fact have been contracting because the fires had burned out and the steel was cooling. And it is ludicrous to suppose that failure of a single girder or a single column in a high-rise would be so catastrophic an event as to induce global collapse of the building in the manner of a controlled demolition, with the symmetrical failure of 400 steel connections per second. Buildings of 47 or 110 stories are over-engineered to ensure they don't collapse from office fires or from a single column failure, because collapse would be such a catastrophic event. That's why it never happens, unless it's part of a ten-year false-flag operation.

Some of NIST's deceptions were quickly identified; for example, in earlier reports they had admitted the existence of shear studs that they omitted in later reports when it was found they were not compatible with the politically required conclusion. Drawings for WTC7 became publicly available after 2008, and analyses by independent engineers identified some other 'errors' made by NIST. They omitted the existence of stiffeners and lateral support beams, and never explained how heating a (fireproofed) 53-foot floor beam uniformly by 600 degrees (to 625 °C) could displace the girder by the required 6.25 inches for it to "walk off" its connection with the columns when, even for uniform heating of 600 C, the increase in length is only 0.000014 x (625 - 25) x (53 x 12) = 5.34 inches according to the formula they cite:
δT = α ΔT L, where δT is the change in length due to uniform heating (in), α is the linear thermal expansion coefficient for steel (°C-1), ΔT is the uniform increase in temperature (°C), and L is the beam length (in). And that doesn't even take into account the fact that at temperatures greater than 400 °C the beams would lose rigidity and sag, relieving the pressure on the girder, whilst it does have to assume all of the displacement occurs at the hypothetical failed girder end and no displacement occurs at the other end.

Moreover, the explicit testimony of Barry Jennings, an eyewitness who told of how he was trapped in WTC7 by early explosions before the collapse of either Tower, directly contradicts the official theory as touted by NIST that fires in WTC7 led to its collapse after being ignited during the collapse of the Twin Towers. Sadly, Mr. Jennings died on August 19, 2008, just two days before NIST released the draft version of its WTC7 report. The 'coincidental' timing of NIST's draft release is consistent with NIST delaying publication until receiving confirmation of the death. The early explosions are consistent with an operation to blow away columns devised by "a team of experts", in which the first columns were destroyed as people were distracted by the fires in the Towers.

Dutch controlled demolitions expert Danny Jowenko died on July 16, 2011 when his car crashed into a tree; his dog survived the crash. This was just three days after Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute at the US Army War College, had cited Mr. Jowenko's expert testimony that the collapse of WTC7 was a "controlled demolition" by "a team of experts" who had "blown away columns", three-and-a-half minutes into an interview for Press TV with Susan Modaress. The 'coincidental' timing of the "accident" is consistent with a hit job designed to stop any further exposure after the testimony had received widespread coverage on the Iranian news channel.

The scientific method includes allowing others to try to replicate the results and to peer review the work. The political or pseudoscientific method includes starting out with a politically motivated narrative, fabricating 'evidence' or computer models to support that narrative, and then refusing to allow peer review or independent replication by refusing to provide details of the input parameters for the computer models, on grounds that such release would "jeopardize public safety".

Israel's SFRM switching operation required the use of moving vans and trucks, along with storage space, in the New Jersey / New York area, and the importing of material of Israeli origin. Conveniently, Israeli moving companies dominated the sector. It started with Moishe Mana, an Israeli who came to New York in 1981, and made a fortune from his company Moishe's Moving Systems. By 1988, "a bunch of foreigners had seized more than half the household-moving market in New York City". Those "foreigners" were Israelis. Moishe's "squeezed out veteran companies in the moving business, founded mainly by Irish and Italian immigrants. In time, competing movers with 'Jewish names' sprang up, and the house-moving market began to be dominated by Israelis." And by 1988, Moishe's turnover was $12 million. Apart from Urban Moving Systems, other Israeli movers included Classic International Movers of NJ and White Glove Movers of 930 Newark Avenue, Jersey City. Exhibit 1, the FBI report on the "dancing Israelis", states that the subcontractors for Moishe's were "all young individuals from Israel just out of the military", all four employees of Classic International Movers were Israeli nationals who'd served in the Israeli military, and a redacted section indicated that many of the Urban Moving Systems employees apparently also worked at White Glove Movers.

The owner of Urban Moving Systems, Dominik Suter, revealed in his Linkedin résumé that he worked as "operations manager" at Moishe's Moving Systems from 1993 to 1996. His job at Moishe's involved "Oversea [sic] operations of a combined space of approximately 700,000 SqFt. of storage and Warehouse, in 3 Storage Facilities in L.I.C. NY, NY and Jersey City, NJ". 700,000 square feet is equivalent to about 16 floors in a WTC Tower, and so there would have been ample room for the (somewhat more than) 280 tons of fake fireproofing destined for WTC1 floors 94 to 98. Moreover, if batches were subsequently received from Israel after previous batches had been sent on to the WTC, the whole 280 tons would not have needed to be stored in the same place at the same time. If Suter meant "Overseas operations", or if it was a Freudian slip as he remembered what he was really doing, that would be particularly intriguing, since the timing 1993 to 1996 is a very good match to the period when it was necessary to import the Israeli-made fake fireproofing. If Suter meant "Oversee operations", then no matter, the shipping was most likely handled by the Zim American-Israeli Shipping Company which moved out of the WTC on September 4, 2001 - one week prior to 9/11/01, and was owned partly by the government of Israel and partly by the Israel Corporation, whose subsidiaries include Israel Chemicals Ltd. (ICL), which engages in development and production of fertilizers, potassium salts and bromine-based "flame retardants" that might be useful in deceptive building demolitions. Suter's job would have been to oversee the storage of the fake SFRM, send it on to Manhattan when required, and dispose of the genuine SFRM, whether through a local Jewish real state developer, or sent overseas by Zim Shipping as a free (stolen) import for use in building projects in Israel. Within the last two decades, soaring real estate value has brought about a dramatic increase in high-rise architecture in Israel. For example, the tallest building is the Moshe Aviv Tower (771 feet, 68 floors above ground), built in 2001. The second tallest is the Azrieli Center Circular Tower (614 feet, 49 floors), built in 1999.

Suter could have been recruited as an intelligence operative whilst working at Moishe's from 1993 to 1996. Both Moishe Mana and his brother Roni had links to Israeli prime ministers, as a result of Moishe's business success. In 2000, for example, Moishe Mana had a four-hour conversation with Ehud Barak when they met for breakfast. Moishe's younger brother Roni Mana used to be in the "close circle of Benjamin and Sara Netanyahu", until they suspected him of being behind a lawsuit brought against Sara in 2010 by the former housekeeper Lillian Peretz for alleged mistreatment. (In March 2014, former caretaker Meni Naftali sued for alleged "racist and physical abuse and humiliation" by Sara Netanyahu. And a gag order was imposed regarding another case, filed months before the Peretz suit. According to the prime minister's office, the latter was "part of a media-orchestrated political conspiracy". Thus, Benjamin Netanyahu is a paranoid conspiracy theorist who claims the media, his political opponents, at least three former employees, lawyers, Roni Mana, etc., are all in on the 'plot'!) By 2013, Moishe Mana was declaring that Benjamin Netanyahu was a "conman", a "security risk" and "incapable of making decisions", which doesn't preclude the possibility that they could have been friends in the 1990s.

Not surprisingly, given all the controversy, Suter omitted to mention Urban Moving, or how he abandoned the company he'd built up and fled to Israel on September 14, 2001, in his profile. He claims to have been the founder of from " (3 years)", but a check at the Wayback Machine shows that the website wasn't operative until August 2002 or shortly before. By January 24, 2003, the domain returned "No web site is configured at this address", so it's not as if he inexplicably took three years to set up the company and then sold it on as a thriving business. Suter's wife Ornit used for her profile; the website was online over the same period with the same template for the front page (front being the operative word), from July 20, 2002 to November 27, 2002 inclusive. An online marketing company, that operated for three years without a website, then had an online presence for merely a few months before vanishing again???

Dominik Suter, year of birth 1970, and associated addresses including Fair Lawn NJ, along with Ornit Levinson Suter, are on a list of FBI suspects dated 22/05/02. Also on that list are Usama bin Laden, and the names of the alleged 9/11 hijackers. The "hijackers" are supposed to have died in plane crashes more than eight months previously, yet are still on a list of "suspects". Dominik Suter also appears a few times in Gerald Shea's memorandum to the 9/11 Commission, which includes the DEA report on the "art students". (Or see here for the DEA report alone.) The memorandum mentions that Suter, described as the leader of the New Jersey DEA group of Israelis, was questioned by the FBI in Weehawken, and was found to have fled the US for Israel when they tried to interview him a second time. He was also active in the Los Angeles area, as were "Mohamed Atta" and "Marwan al-Shehhi".

The Israeli so-called "art students" were operating in the US, often at locations close to the alleged "hijackers", from January 2000 to September 2001. If the "art students" facade crumbled, the first line of defense would be to suggest that they were tracking Arab hijackers in the US, without really admitting it of course. These Israeli "DEA Groups" are mostly the "art students", although some were "movers". They were dubbed "DEA Groups" because they were apparently targeting and attempting to penetrate Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) field offices in the US and even "visiting the homes of numerous DEA employees".

The real purpose behind the "art students'" operation is likely to have been in helping establish the legend of the 'evil' "Arab hijackers", which was soon going to be heavily promoted by the talking heads and the mass media. The "art students" wanted to attract as much attention as possible, and so they would target the authorities, rather than simply try to sell their paintings to the population at random. The planners had reckoned that some stalwart journalists - such as Carl Cameron and Christopher Ketcham - would notice and investigate how the locations of the "art students" were closely correlated with the "future hijackers", and the Israelis would have the ADL tell Fox News that "you're killing us", and get them to pull Cameron's report on the spy ring. In reality, Israel was conducting a major false-flag terrorism operation on American soil, aimed at murdering thousands of Americans and framing "the Saudis", "the Arabs" or "the Muslims" for the attacks (which is MIHOP; Make It Happen On Purpose). The aim was to make it seem like LIHOP (Let It Happen On Purpose), a scenario in which Israeli agents were tracking the "Saudis/Muslims/Islamists/Arabs", and just didn't share their knowledge. In reality, the "future hijackers" were either Arabs who were being framed as terrorist "hijackers", or Mossad operatives who were acting the role of the "hijackers" (and also gambling, womanizing, taking cocaine, eating pork, etc., so as to draw the maximum of attention to themselves).

By having reports pulled, the 9/11 planners would suggest that even the LIHOP scenario was "a conspiracy theory too far, perhaps", and smacked of "anti-Semitism". And if LIHOP was a bit "racist", then MIHOP was really beyond the pale. Each scenario would become a taboo subject, the "elephant in the room", and journalists would be aware that any further reporting of it would be tantamount to "career suicide". In fact, it's even worse than that. Carl Cameron says that merely reporting on the possibility of Israeli spying through the Israeli government-linked company Comverse (which is linked to the London 7/7 bombings) amounts to "career suicide".

However, the LIHOP scenario can easily be dismissed, because only MIHOP fits the facts and eliminates the absurd contradictions such as:

In short, although LIHOP eliminates a few problems such as the lack of military response, foreknowledge, and the "coincidence" of the NRO carrying out a simultaneous exercise of a plane crashing into a tower, along with other war games exercises, etc., it leaves a whole host of absurdities, impossibilities and improbabilities that deliver a fatal blow to LIHOP, because the evidence points to Jewish terrorists who tried to frame Arabs as "hijackers" rather than Arab hijackers, and three high-rises brought down by demolitions rather than office fires. When we assume that MIHOP is false, many contradictions remain; when we assume that MIHOP is true, the contradictions evaporate. Thus, both LIHOP and the official narrative are absurd, and MIHOP is true.

The 9/11 planners were well aware that because the international mass media would be on their side, they could get away with the other absurdities for years, such as the pork chop-loving, cocaine-snorting, hedonistic, ascetic, "devout" Muslims. As to why the mainstream media would support them rather than expose the fraud, that's a whole new topic in and of itself, far beyond the scope of this article, but essentially dates from around 1889 when Alphonse Rothschild became aware of a book written by Maurice Joly.

No less than fifteen of the nineteen alleged hijackers were living in and around the Hollywood, Florida area, and many Israeli spies - most posing as "art students" - were also operating in the vicinity. One of those, listed in Shea's Exhibit B, is the "High-Fiver" Yaron Shmuel. Hollywood, Florida, has long had a sizeable Jewish community. Even in 1971, the Jewish population in the Greater Hollywood, FL area was at least 23,000.

Since 1987, Hollywood, FL has been a sister city of Herzliya, Israel, which is the home of the Mossad's Interdisciplinary Center, the origin of the September 13, 2001 article from Don Radlauer claiming that navigating the 9/11 planes would have been an "easy" task for the "hijackers", and the likely origin of the Odigo instant message providing two hours' advance warning of the attacks on the WTC. And as of 2000/2001, the IDC in Herzliya was the base of Uzi Arad, a year or two after he had been serving in the Mossad and was foreign policy advisor to the accused Benjamin Netanyahu. Apart from Hollywood, FL, Herzliya has just three other twin towns or sister cities in the US: Columbus in Ohio, and Beverly Hills and San Bernardino in California.

Map 1 in Shea's memorandum covers the Hollywood, Florida area.


Source: Gerald Shea's memorandum, Map 1

Freelance journalist Christopher Ketcham reports that of the approximately 120 Israelis posing as "art students", more than thirty lived in the Hollywood, Fla., area, ten in Hollywood itself. And of the nineteen alleged "hijackers", fifteen lived in and around Hollywood, Fla; nine in Hollywood proper and six in surrounding towns.

As of 2010, the US population was 308.7 million and the Hollywood, Fla population was 140,768, which is 1 in 2,193 of the population. Thus, almost half of the "hijackers" lived in an area containing approximately 1 in 2,193 of the population, and 1 in 12 of the "art students" lived in an area containing approximately 1 in 2,193 of the population.

Ketcham writes about the proximity of the Israelis' and the alleged hijackers' addresses:

"One 'art student' was a former Israeli military intelligence officer named Hanan Serfaty, who rented two Hollywood apartments close to the mail drop and apartment of Mohammed Atta and four other hijackers. Serfaty was moving large amounts of cash: he carried bank slips showing more than $100,000 deposited from December 2000 through the first quarter of 2001; other bank slips showed withdrawals for about $80,000 during the same period. Serfaty's apartments, serving as crash pads for at least two other 'art students', were located at 4220 Sheridan Street and 701 South 21st Avenue. Lead hijacker Mohammed Atta's mail drop was at 3389 Sheridan Street--approximately 2,700 feet from Serfaty's Sheridan Street apartment. Both Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi, the suicide pilot on United Airlines Flight 175, which smashed into World Trade Center 2, lived in a rented apartment at 1818 Jackson Street, some 1,800 feet from Serfaty's South 21st Avenue apartment."

In the article by Alan Simpson, published online, with part of it later used for British intelligence Eye Spy magazine, the 3389 Sheridan Street address was used by four other alleged "hijackers". Khalid Al Mihdhar, Abdulaziz al-Omari, Waleed al-Shehri, and  Marwan al-Shehhi are said to have "operated from a mail drop at Mailbox Rentals, 3389 Sheridan St. #256, Hollywood, Florida 33021-3608". At least three of the four later turned up alive and well.

Israeli moving firms such as Moving On Up, Inc., registered on December 15, 1998, used the same 3389 Sheridan Street address, albeit with a different suite number: #159 as opposed to #256. Moving On Up was operating at 3389 Sheridan Street from October 2000, which is a few months after Mohamed Atta and Marwan al Shehhi arrived in Venice, Florida. The Israelis behind the company are Haim Shalem and Tal Lavie. Lavie is the President of Moving On Up, Inc. and Mark D. Cohen is the registered agent. In February 1999, Tal Lavie's corporation Budge It Moving & Storage Inc. was revoked after failing to respond to 60 days' notice of intent to dissolve for failure to maintain a registered agent on whom process may be served at the registered office. Haim Shalem, who calls himself the "customer claims supervisor" of Moving On Up, is a director of several Florida moving companies, and is President of Continental Nationwide Moving Services, Inc., which also uses the 3389 Sheridan Street address. Lavie and Shalem registered Continental Nationwide Moving Services, Inc., in February and March of 1999. Michael Ronen originally was a director of Moving On Up, but resigned on October 24, 1999 (filed 1/18/2000).

So Israeli moving companies and at least five of the alleged nineteen "Arab" hijackers operated from the same 3389 Sheridan Street, Hollywood, Florida address at the same time in 2000/2001.

Shea's memorandum states: "A third principal was Hanan Serfaty (or Sarfati), a team leader residing in Hollywood, Florida. When questioned by the DEA in Tampa, Florida, on March 1, 2001, he had in his possession bank deposit slips amounting to more than $100,000 from December 2000 through the first quarter of 2001, and withdrawal slips for slightly less than that amount during the period. Mr. Serfaty served in the Israeli military between the ages of 18 and 21, but refused to disclose to the DEA his activities between the ages of 21 and 24, including his activities since his U.S. arrival at age 23 in 2000.14 Another was Peer Segalovitz of Tamarac, Florida (about 20 miles west of Hollywood—see MAP 1), an active officer in an Israeli special forces battalion who commanded 80 men in the Golan Heights. He was detained in Orlando on May 3, 2001."

Shea continues: " June 2001, just two or three months before the September 11 hijackings, 15 of the 19 future hijackers were also living in Hollywood, nine in the town itself and six in surrounding towns (see Exhibit B and MAPS 1 and 2). Hollywood, for months, had been and would continue to be the staging ground for the hijacking of the World Trade Center Planes and the Pennsylvania Plane. Among the Israeli groups, more than 30 lived in the Hollywood area, 10 in Hollywood itself."

And it wasn't just Florida where the "art students" were located alongside the so-called "hijackers"; it was all over the US. Dominik Suter's New Jersey DEA Group was closely correlated with "hijackers" in Hudson and Bergen Counties of New Jersey, and there were other pockets of "art students" / "hijackers".


Source: Gerald Shea's memorandum, Map 4

In reality, the job of the Israeli "art students" - more accurately described as Mossad assets, mostly sayanim - was to craft the 9/11 legend by stealing passports and finding Arabs to frame for Israel's imminent false-flag attack. For example, they would carefully observe the movements of Saudi Airlines flight engineers who'd been sent to Florida for pilot training because the airline was eliminating flight engineers from its three-member crews. The program had ended for some of the engineers shortly before 9/11, which is why they were leaving the Vero Beach, Florida area around that time. These people would be claimed as "hijackers", on grounds that they were in the area before 9/11/01, but were gone afterwards. And someone had booked an airline ticket in their name, and their names appeared on incriminating 'evidence' that had been "discovered", so it 'proved' they were guilty. Problem was, it meant that many of the "dead hijackers" would turn up alive and indignant, most likely in Saudi Arabia, and those pushing the legend would have to resort to claiming it was just lots of cases of mistaken identity.

Abdul Rahman Alomari was the original "al-Omari" that they tried to frame as a "hijacker", because he'd just returned to Saudi Arabia after flight school training at Vero Beach. But then he turned up alive, and the story went that it "appeared [to be] a case of mistaken identity". The next person the Liars tried to frame was Abdulaziz al-Omari (whose passport they'd stolen from Denver in 1995). Problem was, he turned up alive too, like nearly half of the "hijackers" out of the final list of nineteen. At this point, the Liars didn't bother trying to find a third "al-Omari"; they just stuck with the name and claimed it as one of the "hijackers". Reality deniers and Hasbara propagandists will simply claim it must have been another case of mistaken identity. But this wasn't merely a case of another person with the same name turning up; the alleged "hijackers" had the same name, place and date of birth and occupation as several of those who turned up alive, including Abdulaziz al-Omari. Clearly, the "art students" who tried to frame him had obtained his personal details from his stolen passport.

A criminal who wants to steal someone's identity is not going to steal the identity of someone with the same name - who probably looks quite different. They would steal the identity of someone with another name, and preferably of similar appearance. But if some Arab hijacker with some name other than Abdulaziz al-Omari stole al-Omari's identity, then the authorities should have told us the real identity of that hijacker. The fact that they haven't is additional confirmation that there were no "Arab hijackers" on the planes, and Mossad "art students" stole identities to frame the Arabs for Israel's false-flag operation.

If Satam al-Suqami, Waleed al-Shehri and Wail al-Shehri had been on the flight manifests, the authorities would not have initially claimed Adnan Bukhari, Ameer Bukhari and Amer Kamfar as hijackers in their place. Adnan was found to be alive and living in Florida. Ameer died in a small plane crash on September 11, 2000 - exactly one year too early. On September 14, 2001, Kamfar was reported as being possibly alive and "armed with an AK-47", and then he turned out to be alive and innocent and living in Mecca: another of those flight engineer / pilots who'd been recalled from Vero Beach to Saudi Arabia.

And given that Ameer Bukhari had been dead for a year, Adnan Bukhari was not a hijacker, and their names were on paperwork relating to a rented 2001 silver-blue Nissan Altima found at Portland International Jetport, Maine, someone was clearly trying to frame the two Bukharis (originally incorrectly said to have been brothers). There would be no point in Arab suicide hijackers trying to frame other Arabs rather than taking the "glory" for themselves. It would have been absurd if the hypothetical Arab terrorists Atta and al-Omari had driven to Portland in the Nissan but had stolen the Bukharis' identities. It would have been ridiculous for sixteen out of nineteen hijackers to give their real names when buying their flight tickets, whilst Satam al-Suqami, Waleed al-Shehri and Wail al-Shehri stole the Bukharis' and Kamfar's identities. It would have been crazy for Satam al-Suqami to use the stolen identity of one of the Bukharis or Kamfar for booking his flight, but then carrying with him on that domestic flight a passport with his real name Satam al-Suqami, to be "discovered" at a place to where the laws of aerodynamics dictate that it could not have flown, after it miraculously became separated from more than 100 tons of debris, got soaked in jet fuel, survived a fireball, and fluttered to the ground, remaining in pristine condition. It would have been absurd if Atta had used his own identity for buying the Pontiac, renting the Mitsubishi and buying his flight ticket, but used a stolen identity for renting the Nissan. And it would have been absurd if Abdulaziz al-Omari had stolen the identity of another Abdulaziz al-Omari in Saudi Arabia who used to live in Denver, for booking his flight, but used one of the Bukharis for travelling in the Nissan. The official narrative has more holes in it than Swiss cheese, or the steel recovered from Larry Silverstein's Building 7!

A good exposition of the frame-up and the evolving list of hijackers' names can be found in Paul Zarembka's The Hidden History of 9-11.

The Liars' plan began to fall apart when it dawned on them that the Bukharis could not be claimed as "hijackers", because one of them was still alive and the other had died in the "wrong" year. So the narrative of 'evidence' from the Nissan had to be altered from the Bukharis to Atta, and some of the stand-in "hijackers" had to take the place of the Bukharis and Amer Kamfar.

As late as September 10, 2001, there was a sighting of Mohammed Atta in a white Mitsubishi at Exit 13 of the Massachusetts Turnpike. He refused to pay the $3.10 toll and sped away, which was hardly consistent with someone planning a hijacking who didn't want to attract the attention of the police ("It's not good enough that you're only going to hold me in a cell overnight until this is sorted out; I need to be on a plane that departs 07:45 a.m. tomorrow morning. It's something very special; we've been planning it for years. Not only that, but I need to go to Portland first!"), or of someone who'd reportedly had $100,000 dollars wired to them, and had boasted in a Hollywood, Fla. bar the previous Friday, "I am an American Airlines pilot. I can pay my bill." But it was exactly as expected from someone deliberately leaving a trail for investigators to chase that would help to build up a legend. From Exit 13, it's a minimum 22-minute drive to Logan Airport, Boston.

The Liars offered no reason for why Atta would rent a white Mitsubishi, leave it at Boston on September 10, then - when he had to be in Boston before 7:45 a.m. the next morning and he already had a rented Mitsubishi - rent a blue Nissan Altima, license plate number 3335VI, drive 106 miles to Portland, leave the Nissan at Portland, and then fly back to Boston and risk missing Flight 11. And why not use his 1989 red Pontiac, license plate D79-DDV or DVD? And there was no explanation of why Atta's bags allegedly failed to get loaded onto Flight 11 when the connecting flight was not late (they arrived in Boston at 6:45 and Flight 11's departure time was 7:45) and every other passenger's baggage made the flight, or why a suicide pilot would take baggage along for a suicide mission in which he would have no further use for it. A hijacker can hardly make use of a "large serrated knife" or a manual slide rule flight computer when it's in the hold, whereas those working to establish a legend have a powerful motive to arrange for baggage to be "discovered" full of 'evidence' that appears to corroborate the official narrative.

But there is an explanation. Just before 9/11, a new American policy had been introduced to prevent delays to flights caused by baggage turning up late. The new policy stated that baggage arriving within ten minutes of the departure time must be held over, to be forwarded on a later flight. This provided the perfect opportunity for those setting up the "Arabs did it" narrative. They would have been hoping that the 19-seat commuter Flight 5930 from Portland might be running late, which they could then cite as the reason for "Atta's" bags failing to make it onto Flight 11. (If the plane arrived too late, they could revert to a Plan B; they'd say that Atta and al-Omari remained at Boston, point to the trail linking Atta and the Mitsubishi, and if any witnesses spoke up about seeing "Atta" in Portland, dismiss it as "mistaken identity".) When the commuter flight was on time, leaving Atta and al-Omari with an hour before Flight 11 was to depart, the operative posing as a "US Airways Express" worker with the job of placing "Atta's" bags still needed to deliver the bags for loading onto the plane within less than ten minutes of take-off. In the event, Atta's bags turned up three minutes before take-off, so they were refused and held over until the next flight to LAX. Most importantly, the 'evidence' was in place, which left the relatively minor problem of no explanation for the bags' delay of nearly 57 minutes. And the fact that "Atta" was the only passenger whose bags didn't make it onto the plane had to be put down as yet another "coincidence".

According to former FBI agent Warren Flagg, one of those bags was "the Rosetta stone of the investigation". The Arab-language papers it contained included the names of the "hijackers" and enabled investigators "to identify all 19 hijackers almost immediately after the attacks". And the other bag was the one containing "Atta's" will, instructions to other "hijackers", a flight manual, etc.

Atta supposedly left an Arabic language flight manual in the Mitsubishi rented in his name, and also left another flight manual in one of his bags that he sent as hold baggage A suicide pilot who has two flight manuals, but fails to take even one of them with him as hand baggage on the plane he intends to hijack?

As a former high-level intelligence official told Seymour Hersh, "Whatever trail was left was left deliberately—for the F.B.I. to chase."

There is another possible clue as to why Portland featured in the narrative. The affidavit for the search warrant for the Nissan parked at Portland - which also included "Atta's" bags that missed the flight at Boston - was dated September 12, 2001, and signed by FBI Special Agent James K. Lechner and United States Magistrate Judge David M. Cohen, who is Jewish. Cohen told of how when he was growing up, "Holocaust survivors" were referred to as "survivors". He is acquainted with Judith Isaacson, who is one of the "survivors". Cohen was a U.S. Magistrate Judge at Portland, Maine, from 1988 to 2008. By having some of the 'evidence' identifying "Arabs" as the perpetrators turn up at Portland, and some of it at Boston, they could lump it together, go through the Portland court, and would have a Jewish judge to rubber-stamp the affidavit - someone who would be inclined to accept 'evidence' purporting to show that Arabs, rather than Jewish terrorists, did 9/11.

By October 6, 2001, a Washington Post report reveals that not only had the 'evidence' been documented in the Portland court, but attempts were being made to link Iraq to the attacks, following commentators' suggestions that the sophistication of the attacks indicated state sponsorship.

In some cases, the original person claimed as a "hijacker" would morph from a quiet, devout Muslim into a loud, flashy Mossad agent who was making himself as conspicuous as possible whilst acting the part of the "hijacker". The agent, who'd probably started out as an "art student", would mix business with pleasure by eating pork chops, playing video games, wearing sneakers and jeans, driving a red Pontiac Grand Prix, snorting cocaine, throwing money around, swilling vodka, frequenting strip clubs, gambling, etc., hardly the sort of behavior to be expected from a "devout" Muslim who had such a hatred of Western culture that he was prepared to kill himself and thousands of others. Sometimes the real Arab who'd been framed would have returned to Saudi Arabia. Others might have been dealt with by Mossad "wetwork" specialists. Mohamed Atta for example originally "ate no pork", was "remote to the point of rudeness with women", and whilst in Hamburg, Germany, he "brought a prayer carpet to his job and carefully adhered to Islamic dietary restrictions, shunning alcohol and checking the ingredients of everything, even medicine". But the "Atta" in the US was eating pork chops, swilling vodka, snorting cocaine, and all the other activities in the list above.

The Liars' priority was obviously to place as much 'evidence' as possible as conspicuously as possible that would point to the Arabs, whilst giving short shrift to making the whole plot seem credible and consistent. Given the deliberate placing of evidence and the obvious frame-ups, it is clear that there were no Arab hijackers, and LIHOP is a non-starter. This was a case of MIHOP, and those making it happen included the accused Benjamin Netanyahu and his pals in the Mossad.

For framing the Arabs, there was no need for "moving company" fronts, and no need to be operating in 1997 and earlier, so this role was assigned to the "art students" and the agents who were acting the roles of Atta and some of the others. Thus, although the "moving companies" operated by Dominik Suter and other Israelis may have played a part in finding Arabs to frame, they obviously had another important role. In the earlier days, that would have involved assisting with the WTC demolitions plot, by transporting the fake SFRM, disposing of the genuine SFRM - possibly via a Jewish real estate developer who could use it. Later, in 2001, the job would have included conspiracies such as the failed attempt to blow up the George Washington Bridge. This could explain why bomb-sniffing dogs reacted as if explosives were present in the infamous "dancing" Israelis' white van.

The job of "documenting the event" was assigned to some of the "movers" - Yaron Shmuel, Sivan Kurzberg and Oded Ellner. As noted, Ellner admitted that they'd deliberately chosen to go to the Doric apartment block because it "gave them a view of the entire length of both towers", before Flight 175 crashed into the second Tower! However, there was another person or persons tasked with capturing footage of the approach of Flight 175. Anthony Lawson exposed how the "twin smokestacks" video footage of Flight 175's approach to the South Tower was taken by someone who not only knew where to aim the camera to catch it early in its approach, but also took the footage from a rooftop from which the smokestacks provided an excellent reference point for lining up the camera. It turns out that the particular rooftop from which the video was filmed happened to be just down the road from the Jewel Electric Supply Company of downtown New Jersey (the building still existed in 2007, but was demolished by 2012), one of whose managers is a member of the Federation of Jewish Men's Clubs and was president of Temple Israel, which registered the prestigious domain in 1997 and has a treasurer by the name of Alex Rothschild.

In the summer of 2000, the Taliban banned opium production in Afghanistan. And the Jewish "American" neocons behind PNAC published a paper about the 'benefits' of a "new Pearl Harbor". One of the paper's co-signatories was Rabbi Dov Zakheim, who was the CEO of SPC International, a company whose Radar Physics Group produced "Flight Termination Systems" whereby an operator or operators could electronically hijack multiple in-flight aircraft "several hundreds of miles" away, fly them via the "Command Transmitter System", and simultaneously steer them into targets. This would enable the operators, who could have the skills of ace fighter pilots, to steer the planes into tall buildings or the Pentagon's first floor.

Given that Afghan opium poppy cultivation slumped to virtually zero in 2001 and rocketed after the 2001 invasion and regime change, the obvious conclusion is that the Taliban's opium policy hit trafficking profits of the CIA and the Mossad, and so the regime needed to be removed.


Source: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

Meanwhile, in what Israel's apologists would need to 'explain' as a string of bizarre "coincidences", the accused Benjamin Netanyahu, an Israeli premier with a BSc in architecture from MIT, would go on to be in London on the morning of the 7/7 bombings in 2005 and would have advance knowledge of those explosions, had already "predicted" in 1995 that terrorists would topple the World Trade Center, and was a close friend of a real estate developer who would go on to secure a 99-year lease on the WTC Towers and insure for billions of dollars against terrorist attacks to cover rebuilding costs and "business interruption" - six weeks before the WTC was destroyed in terrorist attacks. A plethora of evidence proves that, over a period of nine or ten years leading up to September 2001, Netanyahu had indeed been directing a conspiracy that involved a massive false-flag terror attack on the WTC, to be used as the casus belli or "new Pearl Harbor" to kick-start a "war on terror" that would further the goals of a group of racist fanatics who would settle for nothing less than world domination.

To kick off the legend, Jerome Hauer would go on TV within hours of the 9/11 attacks to tell everyone that "It... certainly has the fingerprints of somebody like bin Laden" and that the World Trade Center collapsed because of "the velocity of the plane" and "intense heat probably weakened the structure as well". This was straight out of the Hasbara playbook: "Uncritical audiences believe something if they hear it first and hear it often". Bizarrely, Hauer was a modern-day Renaissance Man - an expert on building collapses who was forensically analyzing steel beams from partially collapsed buildings in 1999, a bioterrorism expert who advised White House staff on the evening of 9/11 to start taking the anthrax antidote Cipro one week before terrorists launched a US military-grade anthrax letters campaign targeting Democratic Senators and news media offices, a "veteran of emergency preparedness and management who holds a master's degree in public health" who persuaded Mayor Giuliani to set up a command post on the 23rd floor of WTC7 with mapping and communications systems that helped combat an outbreak of West Nile Virus that erupted in New York City in 1999, and an Arab terrorism 'expert' who immediately knew who to blame for 9/11 and gave the job of WTC head of security to his 'friend' John O'Neill, a former FBI counter-terror specialist and a real Osama bin Laden expert who disagreed with the official policy not to kill bin Laden and was killed when the WTC collapsed.

Daniel Lewin, ostensibly a "passenger" on Flight 11, had served in the Israeli elite special forces unit Sayeret Matkal, where he attained the rank of Captain. He was an alumnus of MIT, and had lived in the US and in Jerusalem, which meant he had all of that in common with Benjamin Netanyahu. Thus, the chances of the two not being acquainted are close to zero. Netanyahu needed to recruit a highly skilled and capable operative who would have the job of disabling the crew after the plane was brought under the control of Zakheim's Flight Termination Systems, so that they wouldn't regain manual control and stop it hitting floors 94-98 of WTC1. Abdulaziz al-Omari, one of the alleged Flight 11 "hijackers" (who later turned up alive and well!), said he'd had his passport stolen when his Denver apartment was burgled in 1995, and the ex-Sayeret Matkal Flight 11 passenger Daniel Lewin who incidentally had made and lost a fortune in the dotcom boom and bust and, interestingly, "loved jumping out of planes", used to live in Denver, moved to Israel as a teenager but then moved back to the US in 1995 to study at MIT after he'd served in Sayeret Matkal and had finished studying at the Technion University in Israel. (Netanyahu's father Benzion - a supporter of terrorism and extremism - taught at Denver University for part of his career, living there with his young family.) Thus, as early as 1995, the Mossad had already stolen at least one identity that would be claimed as an "Islamist" hijacker - although the "art students" were brought in to make up the rest in January 2000. And Netanyahu had a fellow Sayeret Matkal Captain who'd won the Teenage Mr. Israel bodybuilding competition, loved jumping out of planes, and "knew how to fight with knives and take knives away from people", on his aircraft hijacking team. Since Lewin had just made and lost a fortune in the dotcom boom and bust, he would have relished the opportunity to go down in history as a "hero" who gave his life in the cause of Zionism, as did Netanyahu's brother Jonathan.

By 2014, the Jewish press were so confident that Netanyahu had got away with masterminding 9/11 that they circulated a provocative cartoon depicting Bibi flying a plane about to crash into the World Trade Center. There's chutzpah for you!


Source: The Forward, originally from Haaretz

The mainstream media - given their ownership and bias - naturally shout from the rooftops whenever there is any story about Islamist or Arab suicide bombers. But when a suicide bomber is a Jewish Israeli, in a failed attempt to bomb the US Capitol, the newspapers bury the report well away from the front page. The story of Israel Rubinowits was circulated nationally by Michael Collins Piper in the September 30, 2002 issue of American Free Press, and subsequently in several of his books including False Flags: Template for Terror. On October 18, 1983, Rubinowits, 22, an Israeli, entered the House of Representatives "with a homemade bomb under his shirt". The bomb was constructed from two soft-drink bottles filled with "black powder, a flammable liquid of unknown composition, glass, stones, ceramic tile and metal fragments", was strapped to his body with a rope, and according to the Washington Post report, was "wired to an apparently operative detonating cap".  Rubinowits was seen to be mumbling to himself and acting suspiciously, and when officers approached, he "allegedly threatened to blow up the building", and was arrested. The bomb was "not a dud", but failed to go off because the wiring was not properly connected. Rubinowits was carrying an Israeli passport indicating that he'd arrived in the US two weeks previously, and, like the High-Fivers, was quietly sent back to Israel.

Rubinowits is a variant of Rubinowitz, a Jewish name. Imagine if an Islamist "suicide bomber" was caught under similar circumstances today. If he wasn't summarily killed, like wholly innocent Brazilian electrician Jean Charles de Menezes who was shot multiple times and killed by police in London a couple of weeks after the 7/7 bombings, he'd be in a high-security prison for the rest of his natural life. On the other hand, even today, a Jewish would-be bomber would probably receive the same treatment as the High-Fivers, and sent back to Israel after a couple of months, following the inevitable pressure on Washington and negotiations between Israel and the US.

The 9/11 perpetrators originally planned to topple the WTC, blame it on "Islamic" terrorists, and use it as an excuse to annex Iraq, with Iran, Syria and Afghanistan also on the list. A 1996 paper from Richard Perle and other "neocons" entitled A Clean Break, published for Benjamin Netanyahu, advocated "removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right". One development in 2000, as described above, was the Taliban banning of opium production in Afghanistan, and so Afghanistan, rather than Iraq, became the first priority for "regime change".

Another development in March 2000 was the revelation that the Pentagon's finances were "in disarray" and almost $7 trillion of bookkeeping adjustments had been required in order to balance the accounts, with $2.3 trillion of those corrections lacking receipts. At this point, dollar - or shekels! - signs started to light up in the eyes of those planning the false-flag attack. However many paid or unpaid shills for the Israeli or American governments lie and deceive with misleading diversions such as Hanjour not being concerned if his passengers got a bumpy ride, it doesn't alter the enormity of the feat that Hanjour is required to have performed if the official story is true. Although in principle a non-pilot could have simply operated the controls at random, and simply got the correct sequence by chance, just like a monkey with a typewriter might have written the complete works of Shakespeare, only a lunatic or a liar would favor the Hanjour-got-lucky explanation over the alternative that stares everyone in the face.

Dov Zakheim's SPC International "Flight Termination System" was employed to electronically hijack Flight 77 - and the other three 9/11 planes - and control them by Command Transmitter Systems. The remote operators were ace pilots from the Israeli or US military. After Zakheim was co-signatory of the 2000 PNAC document that called for a "new Pearl Harbor", he was (nominated by Bush and) installed as Pentagon Comptroller. This gave him the power to hire and fire those who did the data backups. By having a plane "coincidentally" target the accounts section, killing dozens of accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts, and destroying documents and outdated standalone accounting computer systems, they could destroy the money trail after swindling tens or hundreds of billions of dollars, and then frame "Islamists" for the attack. It would be an advantage to have someone with links to accounting fraud such as Enron's former CEO Thomas E. White - who'd been on JINSA trips to Israel - installed as Secretary of the Army. Later, the missing funds would be 'explained' as merely a proportion of the $2.3 trillion of unidentified transactions that lacked receipts, and Zakheim would go on to boast about how he'd "found" some of the "missing" $2.3 trillion.

The planners must have been furious with whoever was responsible for the blunder in selecting the "pilots" and matching them up with the planes, so that a "very bad pilot" who "could not fly at all" was supposed to have performed the hardest feat in hitting the Pentagon's first floor. But for damage control, they'd just bring out someone like Eddie Guigui Shalev, an Israeli national who'd served in the Israeli Defense Forces in the paratroops regiment and entered the US in April 2001, and have him say that the "very bad pilot" was a "good" pilot, despite all the evidence.

The psychopaths bent on world domination had plenty of motives for perpetrating the 9/11 attacks. At the same time as they have others pay the price (in blood and treasure), they swindle billions of dollars from the Pentagon, disable Israel's enemies, "lead opinion in the direction of [Zionist] aims" such as creating sympathy for Israel in its supposed fight against Palestinian "terrorists" (which is actually a sustained ethnic cleansing), restore their Afghan opium trafficking profits, loot Iraq's oil wealth, and advance their internationalist agenda, which includes bringing more nations under the control of private central banks. They have their "new Pearl Harbor" as casus belli to provoke a clash of civilizations and launch a "War on Terror" - which is actually a War of Terror against anyone who stands in their way. Anyone who is thinking of joining that war should consider whether they really want to be part of some racist crusade against all of Islam that makes the world a more dangerous place for almost everyone apart from the elite.

The Zionist psychopaths had tens or even hundreds of billions of reasons for the Pentagon hit alone - whatever proportion of $2.3 trillion they thought they could get away with and still blame losses on bad accounting and the 'unlucky' fact that the accounts section was targeted. A cocaine-snorting, vodka-swilling, video-gaming, Pontiac-driving, pork-eating, gambling, womanizing "Muslim" has very little incentive to kill himself in some mindless attack on Western freedoms in the hope that Allah might grant him 72 virgins in paradise for being such a devout Muslim, especially when the attack provides Zionist forces with the "new Pearl Harbor" that they need to launch their crusade against Islam.

The WTC was ready - or largely ready - for demolition by 2000, with the replacement "fireproofing" installed. They weren't going to call off that operation, since it would be far more spectacular for the TV screens than a few frames of Pentagon footage that didn't even have clear evidence of a plane, and thereby setting up the stage for a diversionary debate about whether it was a plane or a missile. After elements of the Bush Admin had been roped into the Pentagon hit, they would be forced to cover for the Mossad's WTC demolitions in order to save their own skins.

Mossad operations have a tendency to go wrong, because whilst the top-level planners are very cunning Ashkenazis, those sent out in the field are not so bright. They are generally people who were duped into enlisting after being told the operations were necessary to save Jews worldwide. For example, Israelis Salvador Guersson Smecke and Saur Ben Zvi were caught and arrested inside the Mexican Congress chamber in possession of guns, grenades, dynamite, detonators and wiring while posing as "press photographers" on October 10, 2001, three days after the October 7, 2001 launch of the war in Afghanistan, after a large-scale 37-nation poll of world opinion carried out by Gallup International had found a 94% majority of Mexicans were opposed to military intervention in Afghanistan. Israeli agents Uriel Kelman, 30, and Eli Cara, 50, were caught and sentenced to six months' jail for their part in the New Zealand plot to steal a passport from a "tetraplegic man who had not spoken in years". As documented above, the High-Fivers Israeli nationals Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner and Sivan Kurzberg were seen filming and photographing the burning WTC ("documenting the event") and high-fiving, smiling, hugging each other, joking and flicking lighters in a jovial, celebratory mood at a location that was an excellent vantage point for videotaping planes approaching from the north and south to hit both Towers - not only before the second plane impact, but before the local AM news radio station 1010 WINS had even broken the news of the first plane impact. They were arrested that afternoon and found to be in possession of international airline tickets with immediate travel dates.

(If Efraim Halevy or Benjamin Netanyahu were working as field operatives, you can bet that those two old masters would be too professional and too smart to give the game away by high-fiving, taking "selfies" whilst flicking a lighter in celebration, etc. In contrast, the youngsters who are brainwashed into participating in Zionist terrorist operations do not have the experience and maturity to avoid making mistakes.)

What a "coincidence" that the High-Fivers had planned to leave the country the day after 9/11/01 (q.v. above), and Urban Moving Systems had been operating since 1997, yet the company was closed and the workers fired at lunch time on 9/11/01! That's before we count the NRO exercise commencing at 9:00 a.m. on 9/11/01 of a plane crashing into a tower, or Netanyahu's friend Larry Silverstein obtaining a 99-year lease on the WTC Towers and securing 12-layer, 22-company insurance coverage against terrorist attacks aggregating $3,546,809,904 "per occurrence", and including property damage and business interruption, six weeks before the buildings were destroyed in two "occurrences" of terrorist attacks. Or Silverstein's daily breakfast at the Windows on the World restaurant on the 106th and 107th floors of the North Tower, but failing to turn up on 9/11/01 because of a "dermatologist's appointment". Or his two children Roger and Lisa also being spared a ghastly fate after uncharacteristically failing to turn up for work that day because they were "running late". Or the fact that two of those listed as killed on Flight 77 - William E. Caswell and John Yamnicky - had worked on "deep-black" projects. Or the Zim American-Israeli Shipping Company's move out of the WTC on September 4, 2001 - one week prior to 9/11/01. Or Netanyahu not only happening to be in London on the morning of the 7/7 bombings, but also having advance knowledge of the explosions. Or Dominik Suter's mother-in-law's decision to make a transaction on a Florida property on September 7, 2001, the Friday before 9/11/01, consistent with the family knowing that they might need to flee to Israel a week later, which in fact they did on September 14, 2001. And many more too numerous to mention.

Apart from the arrest of the "dancing Israelis" after the High-Fivers were not sufficiently discreet, another Mossad failure on 9/11 involved a sub-plot to blow up the George Washington Bridge. It was foiled when the Israelis' van was stopped and found to contain "tons" of explosives. The Israelis had set up various decoys to divert attention from the GWB. One Israeli phoned the Jersey City police, claiming to have seen a van "heading toward the Holland tunnel", that the occupants "look[ed] like Palestinians", and one of them was "mixing some junk" (i.e., constructing a bomb) and "dressed like an Arab" in "sheikh uniform". In the US, only Israeli Jews would have knowledge of various Arabic dress, would know what a Palestinian looked like, and would have a grudge against Palestinians. When the high-fivers were arrested, Sivan Kurzberg told the officer: "We are Israeli, we are not your problem. Your problems are our problems, the Palestinians are the problem."

Another diversion involved a "panel truck with a painting of a plane flying into the World Trade Center"; it had been "rented to a group of ethnic Middle Eastern people who did not speak English". Officially, "the vehicle was found to be an innocent delivery truck". "Innocent"?? How did they know a plane was going to fly into the WTC? Or are we supposed to believe that the painting was done within minutes of the first crash?

To help with damage control, the perps needed a compliant New York Police Commissioner, who would claim "there was no explosives in the van", after multiple, credible reports of "tons" of explosives. He would also announce the "discovery" of a "hijacker's" passport that was handed in by a mysterious stranger who immediately ran off and was never seen nor heard from again - a passport that was said to have been "soaked in jet fuel" yet survived the fireball and was found in pristine condition. And, of all the reported places where it was said to have been found - in the vicinity of Vesey Street, several blocks from the WTC, a few blocks from the WTC, etc. - for all of them, the passport could only have flown there had there been a circumvention of the laws of aerodynamics (in addition to the failure of the laws of combustion of kerosene-soaked passports, and the failure of the laws of probability in order for it to become separated from everything else and then "discovered"). Bernard Kerik went on a four-day trip to Israel from August 26-29, 2001, two weeks in advance of 9/11. Ostensibly, the trip, approved by Mayor Giuliani and paid for by the NYC taxpayer, was supposed to be about combating terrorism and Israeli Ecstasy trafficking, yet bizarrely, for such a trip, "Kerik is not bringing any NYPD terrorist or narcotics experts with him". Of course, it's not bizarre at all if a private deal was to be done. During that trip, Kerik met Israeli billionaire Eitan Wertheimer, who is "friends with prime ministers" and was reading Popular Mechanics at the age of 4 (thus, sufficiently influential to have them run an article 'debunking' "conspiracy theories"). Years later, Kerik was convicted of lying, conspiracy and fraud. It was revealed that he'd received a $250,000 "loan" from Wertheimer via Brooklyn marble and stone merchant Shimon Cohen who served as intermediary in the transaction, had rent payments to the value of more than $236,000 paid between 2001 and 2003 by Steven C. Witkoff, a New York real estate developer with business links and other associations with Israel, and received a $28,000 "loan" from Nathan Berman, a prominent local real estate developer and former art dealer who'd immigrated from the Ukraine in 1973.

The clowns who wrote the 9/11 narrative couldn't even get their story straight on whether it was supposed to be Atta's or Suqami's passport that was "discovered". (That was because of the fiasco about the Bukhari 'brothers'; Suqami was originally on the Liars' short list for the "hijackers", and was only promoted to a "hijacker" after the frame-up failed on the Bukharis. Then, because they had to claim Atta's baggage hadn't made it onto the plane, they chose Suqami for the passport story.) Moreover, with both attempts, they forgot which plane the "hijacker" was supposed to be on. The passport was claimed to have been discovered in the vicinity of Vesey Street to the north, and "Atta's" and "Suqami's" plane was said to have approached from the north, in which case the passport would have carried on to the south, to Liberty Street. In another variation of the narrative, the passport was found blocks away, which would have required either a sudden, temporary removal of Manhattan's atmosphere (whilst still allowing a jet fuel fireball to erupt!), or a suspension of the laws of aerodynamics - in either case, without anyone noticing. In fact, the drag forces acting on the passport would have caused it to decelerate too rapidly to be able to clear buildings to the south of Liberty Street, such as the Deutsche Bank (Bankers Trust) building and the St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church.

Another amusing point is that the passport was claimed to be "soaked in jet fuel", whereas the jet fuel was atomized into a fine mist - which is how it was able to ignite whilst cooler than the minimum flash point of 38 °C for kerosene-grade Jet A fuel. Thus, at most, the passport should have been slightly damp rather than soaked, even if unignited jet fuel had caught up with it. The passport is supposed to have a sufficiently high initial velocity whilst dodging the core columns, partitions, perimeter columns, filing cabinets, etc., and exiting the North Tower, coupled with a sufficiently high mass compared to the product of its mean frontal cross-sectional area (as it spins) and its drag coefficient, in order to end up "blocks" away (which is in fact impossible). And the jet fuel-"soaked" passport fails to ignite, and is "discovered" by a mysterious, unidentified stranger in such pristine condition, it looks like it's just come off the Mossad's production line!

Rather like the passport, another piece of so-called 'evidence' cited at the 2006 trial of Zacarias Moussaoui was a red bandana, allegedly "found" at the Flight 93 crash site  It takes a special brand of lunacy to believe that a bandana could survive a plane crash looking like it had just been bought from the store...



...whilst the head and torso of the "hijacker" it was allegedly attached to, along with the other bodies, baggage, aircraft seats, etc, were reduced to scrap and ashes.



If evidence existed of "Arab" hijackers, they would not have needed to fake it, the same as if evidence existed of Iraq having "WMD", they would not have needed to forge documents about yellowcake uranium from Niger, or pretend to be stupid enough to have confused hydrogen gas generators (for inflating artillery weather balloons, and sold by British company Marconi Command & Control to the Iraqis) with "mobile biological weapons labs", or to have the NSA conspire with British Intelligence to conduct a dirty tricks campaign of bugging UN diplomats from "swing states", whose support would have been needed in order to legitimize the Iraq war.

Interestingly enough, some of the Israeli Urban Moving Systems "movers" were seen travelling to the Flight 93 crash site on 9/11/01, as consistent with someone having to plant a red bandana to be 'found'. From Exhibit 1: "Furthermore, on 09/11/2001, [redacted] of the Pennsylvania State Police detained a yellow Penske box truck upon the request of Newark. [Redacted] inspected the vehicle and determined that the vehicle's two (2) occupants, [redacted] and [redacted] both identified as Israeli nationals, were on their way to Columbus, OH. When Newark later questioned [redacted] of Urban Moving Systems about the vehicle's presence in Pennsylvania, he could not offer an explanation. According to the moving company's [redacted] the two (2) occupants and their vehicle were supposed to complete a moving job in a different part of the country." By a bizarre 'coincidence', the route from Weehawken, NJ to Columbus, OH passes within 2 or 3 miles of Shanksville and Indian Lake in PA.

Although there is no shortage of evidence proving the State of Israel's central role in 9/11, it's often the case that the cover-up provides plenty of confirmation in identifying the perpetrators, and 9/11 is no exception.

The propagandists handling the cover-up would have 'ex'-CIA assets such as John Lear, and 'ex'-MI5 assets such as David Shayler, and 'ex'-Bush Admin assets such as Morgan Reynolds, play the part of whack jobs and peddle crackpot claims about "hologram-planes" hitting the Towers, so that those who still believed the official conspiracy theory would think the millions of people working to expose 9/11 were tinfoil-wearing kooks who thought the planes were faked with holograms. For example, according to John Lear, the moon has gravity as much as 64% of earth's gravity, a "fission reactor", a breathable atmosphere in the craters, and "forests, meadows, lakes, rivers, people, civilizations" on the dark side. David Shayler dresses as a woman and claims to be the Messiah. Reynolds is more sane than the others, but that's not saying much!

Cass Sunstein, who is Jewish, is the lead author of a paper entitled Conspiracy Theories, in which he advocates "cognitive infiltration of extremist groups". His "extremist groups" are people who don't believe the government account of 9/11. The "cognitive infiltration" described by Sunstein was already well underway long before his January 2008 paper was published. Elements of the CIA, MI5 and the Bush Admin were complicit, either in various parts of the 9/11 plot, or the ensuing cover-up. All had an interest in propping up the "Arabs did 9/11" lunacy as a pretext for war and supposed justification for their role in "protecting" their citizens, whether by sanctioning imprisonment and torture of people without trial on the basis of their race or religion, or by broadcasting the looney tunes stories about hologram-planes. But the warmongering "neocons" and global Jewish crime syndicate had the most to lose. Sunstein wanted more official backing for the counterintelligence program if the Democrats won the presidential election later that year. If his protégé Obama won the Democratic nomination, Sunstein would have some 'advice' already prepared. If Hillary Clinton won, then she'd already admitted to being a Mishpucka member at the 2005 Roast of Rahm Emanuel (see at 7:00 in this video).

Sunstein claims that "conspiracy theorists" have a "crippled epistemology" because they get all their information from a single source (anti-government, conspiracy-minded websites), and therefore end up with the wrong conclusions. He is turning the truth on its head. The fact is that the so-called "conspiracy theorists" have looked at all sides of the argument, and get their information from as many sources as possible. They look at the government narrative, alternative theories, pro-government analyses and anti-government analyses, and find that the government narrative is riddled with holes. It is the true believers in the government narrative who refuse to consider alternatives, who only get their information from mainstream TV and newspapers. They are heavily reliant upon the conclusions that are spoon-fed to them from the mainstream media (MSM); they gloss over the fact that the conclusions are riddled with absurdities and do not follow from the raw information, and they fail to make the connections that would allow them to perceive the world as it actually is. This is not to say that the MSM is useless; in fact, it is indispensible. The MSM does an excellent job at providing raw information, such as the two hours' advance warning of the WTC attacks transmitted through an Israeli instant messaging company with offices in Herzliya, or how Hani Hanjour was too timid to ask for a toothbrush and was a "very bad pilot" who "could not fly at all", or Benjamin Netanyahu's advance knowledge of the London 7/7 bombings, his statement immediately after 9/11 that it was "very good" for Israel, how he "soaked up his father's admiration for Ze'ev Jabotinsky and his doctrine", and participated in a two-day seminar in 2006 commemorating the 1946 King David Hotel bombing.

Those who manage the MSM, the FBI, and NIST, etc., cannot micro-manage every piece of raw information. Sometimes they will deceptively retract some information when someone realises it's too incriminating, such as the admission of Netanyahu's London 7/7 foreknowledge, but that's the exception rather than the rule. (They had to retract that when they realised that Scotland Yard was not going to let Israel off the hook by pretending to have foreknowledge, which meant that the foreknowledge - or "the buck" - stopped with Israel.) Or they are aware that they cannot afford to release certain data - such as the input parameters for NIST's WTC7 computer models, or the tremendous amount of redactions and missing documents in the FBI High-Fivers report - since their sorry facade would come tumbling down. When the MSM has taken down news pages, or turned it into a pay-per-view page, the page will sometimes be retained at a "truther" site. It doesn't mean that the "truther" site has made it up. All the MSM can do is to set up the legend in the first place, take down the more revealing pages and manage the conclusions, so that they are left with only those conclusions that are deemed politically acceptable. Frequently, the conclusions will be incompatible with the evidence that they supposedly derive from. So that is where the MSM does fail dismally, when it misinforms folk by peddling its Zionist-friendly managed conclusions such as "the Arabs did 9/11". (Or it succeeds, from the viewpoint of its lying, deceiving owners...) And setting up the legend in the first place is done by giving a platform to people such as Jerome Hauer, who was on TV within hours of the 9/11 attacks to tell everyone that: "It... certainly has the fingerprints of somebody like bin Laden" and that the World Trade Center collapsed because of "the velocity of the plane" and "intense heat probably weakened the structure as well".

Alternative information websites ultimately need to refer back to mainstream sources, because otherwise anyone could simply make up anything to support their conclusions, and their entire argument would be worthless. The job of the alternative media is not to make things up, such as crazy claims that beam weapons zapped the Towers or the Boston Marathon bombings were faked with amputee actors; it is to show how to derive true conclusions by connecting the dots within the abundance of evidence from mainstream sources that couldn't be micro-managed and, in its entirety, does not support the officially sanctioned "truth".

Incidentally, in his book Simpler: The Future of Government, Sunstein admits that he got the concept of a "crippled epistemology" for his 2008 Conspiracy Theories paper from the 2002 essay The Crippled Epistemology of Extremism by political scientist Russell Hardin. David Ray Griffin's critique of the Hardin / Sunstein view of epistemology shows that they are incorrectly equating knowledge and beliefs. But by doing so, Sunstein is tacitly conceding that the "extremist" beliefs of the "conspiracy theorists" he opposes are just as valid as the "knowledge", or allegedly justified true beliefs, of the true believers in the "Arabs with box cutters" 9/11 conspiracy theory. 

Since Sunstein can hardly fail to be aware that Israel did 9/11, he knows that his best strategy is to introduce many new conspiracy theories, each of them with various degrees of craziness, but they all need to be crazier than the government's own 9/11 conspiracy theory of nineteen hijackers with box cutters. Thus, Sunstein recommends a policy of countering multiple theories and "cognitive infiltration" of truth seekers, and the disinformation agents promote preposterous theories such as no one died on 9/11, no planes hit the WTC, the WTC was nuked, the Boston Marathon bombings were faked with amputee actors, fake blood and smoke machines, the Woolwich soldier killing was faked with fake blood, and so on. It is then an easy task for other agents to knock down these straw men, and they can attempt to counter those who tell the facts about 9/11. Casual observers who start to suspect some things are not right with the official narrative will stop their investigation after seeing the crazy claims, and imagining them to be the work of the "truthers".

One of the leading disinformation agents who is dedicated to promoting the very stupidest theories is Dr. James H. Fetzer, a professor of philosophy, who claims a "sophisticated hologram" was used to fake each plane, and mini-nukes were used to demolish the WTC buildings. He also suggests that theories of directed energy space beam weapons being used to demolish the buildings are worthy of consideration. None of the preposterous space beam theory's adherents have ever attempted to explain how a satellite or drone would be capable of delivering a targeted peak power output of many times the entire power consumption of humankind (1.6x1013 W in 2010). It requires some 5.7x1014 J to vaporize the steel in both towers, and so if this energy is pumped in over ten seconds, the power required is 5.7x1013 W. However, that presumes that the process is 100% efficient. When scattering, absorption, reflection, and other losses are taken into account, the device needs to be many, many times as powerful as all of Earth's power stations put together. Fetzer is certainly not foolish enough to believe the nonsense he espouses, and the most likely explanation is that he simply swallowed the official narrative, and imagines he's being patriotic in defending it by peddling outrageous conspiracy theories.

Professor Fetzer has authored, co-authored, edited or co-edited several books concerned with epistemology and cognition. Moreover, a number of these books were published by Springer, the company founded by Julius Springer, who was Jewish. These include:

Sunstein needed someone to manage "cognitive infiltration designed to break up the crippled epistemology of conspiracy-minded groups". Who better than a professor whose expertise is in epistemology and cognition? Moreover, Fetzer had already been flagged as operating a "campaign of disinformation" prior to 9/11/01, and "he told one researcher that he begins by deciding what is the truth, and then marshals evidence (selectively) to support that 'truth'." (If Fetzer wasn't already involved in the disinformation campaign, he would have been an ideal character for Shyam Sunder's NIST 'investigations' team!)

A professor smart enough to understand epistemology, probability and the philosophical aspects of cognitive systems would not be foolish enough to imagine that a video (e.g., the infamous September Clues) that makes ridiculous, unsubstantiated claims is a more reliable source of knowledge than a plethora of evidence such as aircraft debris, eyewitnesses, photographs, video and news reports. The September Clues video was made by Simon Shack/Hytten, whose father Eyvind Hytten served as a controlled opposition Judas Goat for the government, in order to counter the work of anti-Mafia crusader Danilo Dolci, who accused prominent members of the government of colluding with the Mafia. Moreover, the Formula One racing career of Simon's brother Mario Hytten was sponsored by Yeslam bin Laden.

The website Veterans Today is one of the government's disinformation outlets. In October 2012, Gordon Duff, of Jewish descent, actually admitted that 40% of his writing was "at least purposely partially false", and that about 30% of the material on Veterans Today is "patently false". Duff, billed as "one of the top global intelligence specialists", is the Chairman on the VT Editorial Board, and Jim Fetzer writes much of the "patently false" nonsense that may be found there.

According to attorney Brian Glick, the FBI used four basic methods for their COINTELPRO of the 1960s: Infiltration by agents and informers, psychological warfare from the outside, harassment through the legal system, and extralegal force and violence. His book War At Home: Covert Action Against U.S. Activists and What We Can Do About It has the following description for infiltration (page 10):

1. Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main purpose was to discredit and disrupt. Their very presence served to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine activists as agents.

Glick points out how agents accuse genuine activists of the very deceptions that agents are themselves guilty of.

Covert Manipulation to Make A Legitimate Activist Appear to be an Agent: An actual agent will often point the finger at a genuine, non-collaborating and highly-valued group member, claiming that he or she is the infiltrator.

The billionaire Zionist media mogul Rupert Murdoch is a long-time friend of the accused Benjamin Netanyahu. Prior to 9/11, in the 1990s, Netanyahu "often" stayed with his friend Rupert Murdoch in London. Murdoch's son James joined News Corporation in 1996 and was placed in charge of its internet operations. In June 2000, Kathryn Murdoch née Hufschmid, a public relations executive and Director of Strategy & Communications at the Clinton Foundation's Clinton Climate Initiative, married James Murdoch. Very quickly after the 9/11 attacks, Kathryn's half-brother Eric Hufschmid became a prominent internet critic of the government's 9/11 narrative, on the basis of a book (Painful Questions) and video (Painful Deceptions). These never pointed the finger at Israel, but contained many excellent photographs of the WTC collapses, as might be expected from those with privileged access to news archives. This ten-minute audio clip from the September 8, 2010 Piper Report recounts how individuals who'd been associated with Eric Hufschmid believed his book to be the work of a committee, with Hufschmid the front man for the operation.

In 2006, Hufschmid began accusing just about everyone in the truth movement of being dishonest. He claimed that no less than "99% of the truth seekers" were "somehow connected to" a "criminal network", and accused dozens of people - even including then Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad! - of secretly working for Zionist Jews. At the same time, he promoted bogus, evidence-free conspiracy theories (part of Sunstein's strategy) such as the supposition that Paul McCartney was killed and replaced with an impostor in 1966. The press take great delight in debunking that sort of nonsense from the "conspiracy theorists". And online, Hufschmid blamed Zionist Jews as the culprits, in order that his lunacy would taint honest researchers who correctly identified the perpetrators as his Uncle Rupert's friends. Around July 2007, Hufschmid created and distributed a CD-ROM featuring pornographic images. By 2010 he was writing about his experiences with, and 'research' into, "liquid farts", thereby serving as a heavy liability and severe embarrassment to the anti-Zionist and 9/11 truth movements. At this point he became an increasing irrelevance, but had achieved his - and Murdoch's and Netanyahu's - goals of damaging the truth movement and helping the Jewish terrorists who masterminded the 9/11 operation.

(They had the grandson of a Jewish urologist by the name of Pearlman, who was a "strong" supporter of Israel and was on the Board of the ADL, play the role of an "Islamic terrorist". And they had a guy with a beard and a turban who was dying of kidney disease, and was a member of the bin Laden family who were business partners of the Bush family, as the patsy who was supposed to be the head of a scary global terrorist outfit that called itself "the database". So it's no surprise that they would have James Murdoch's brother-in-law play the part of a "truther".)

Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation created the Fox Television Stations group in 1986. On March 4, 2001, Fox TV broadcast the pilot episode of The Lone Gunmen TV series, an episode about a plot by a secret cabal within the U.S. government to electronically hijack by remote control a Boeing heading for Boston and divert it to crash into the World Trade Center. The broadcast would help to deflect attention from any imminent false-flag attack by Israel by: (i) Diverting suspicion to the Bush administration. (ii) Reinforcing the concept of an attack based on remote-controlled planes as "fiction" or "conspiracy theory".

An anonymous Zionist Jewish propagandist was caught playing both sides of the debate, running several channels on YouTube to broadcast contradictory messages. As evidence of his Jewish heritage, one of his handles was UnitedChildrenOfZionism, and around February 2012 he was posting comments such as "zionism is not bad. I will raise my children to be proud jewish people, the teaching of talmud highest principle. God bless you." And: "Well, i am a jew, and my kids will also be jews." With his pro-government hat on, he made comments such as describing AE911Truth as "faggots". Then, when this same activist used another handle to pose as a paranoid, knuckle-dragging, dumb kid who believed crackpot conspiracy theories and pseudoscientific drivel, he posted in support of the lunatic claims about faked planes and nuclear bomb-based WTC demolitions (supposedly capable of demolishing the WTC with the collapse initiating from the impact zone, and without turning New York into a 21st-century version of Hiroshima!).

One of those posting on YouTube in defense of the government narrative turned out to be a pedophile who was arrested in 2011 and convicted in 2013 for possession of child porn. He is a compulsive liar, and some of his more amusing lies are his boasts about his wartime exploits in Vietnam. For example, he claims he "helped blow up the Perfume River Bridge in Feb. 1975." Problem is, the Vietcong blew up the Perfume River bridge in February 1968, and the last bombing in that war was on August 15, 1973, following the Case-Church Amendment to stop US military operations. He also claims the High-Fivers were detained for less than one day.

A disinformation agent - whether a seedy pedophile, a Jewish activist, or some paid or coerced agent of the government - will typically start by making a few comments at the forums that appear to be pro-truth, without of course ever providing worthwhile new analysis or information not found elsewhere. Then they will start recommending ludicrous claims such as no-planes, nukes or space beam demolitions. The mistake made by the truth movement was to fail to operate a zero tolerance policy on nonsense. If someone points out that no one could seriously be crazy enough to believe in no-planes or amputee-actors-at-Boston-Marathon, because such a person would inevitably be too stupid to post to forums or even boot up a computer, then the agent's accomplices in shilling, or those who have a high tolerance level for garbage, will point out that the no-planer is generally correct about matters, and has simply made a mistake over one or two issues. Then that paves the way for the COINTELPRO element: those who refuse to accept the "mistake" explanation will be accused of being "agents" themselves who are working to damage the truth movement.

The government conspiracy theory is crazy enough, with its pork chop-eating, cocaine-snorting, gambling, vodka-swilling, video gaming, strip joint-frequenting religious fundamentalists who hate Western culture and imagine that by killing themselves and thousands of others, their "God" will be so pleased they've practised such self-restraint that they'll end up in a paradise with 72 virgins. Or its 19 Arabs who manage to avoid leaving any hard evidence that they were on the 9/11 planes, whilst succeeding in hijacking four planes with box cutters, without the pilots ever being able to take the two or three seconds it takes to squawk the hijacking code, but with the hijackers being able to switch off all the transponders. Or its three steel-framed high-rises that collapse from fires on the same day, to the advantage of Jewish businessmen who insured against terrorist attacks less than six weeks before terrorist attacks, with the chief investor and his children not turning up at the building on the day of the attacks, and it was supposed to be all just a series of coincidences. The 9/11 conspirators introduce novel conspiracy claims such as hologram-planes-hit-the-WTC, mini-nukes-demolished-the-WTC, space-beam-weapons-demolished-the-WTC, Boston-Marathon-bombings-were-faked-with-amputee-actors, and so on, which are even crazier than the government theory, so that the government theory seems quite reasonable in comparison.

In his paper, Cass Sunstein points out that the disadvantage for the government in rebutting a particular theory is that it may "legitimate" the theory, and a theory may gain rather than lose adherents when it is perceived as sufficiently plausible that the government needs to counter it. Sunstein recommends a strategy of "rebutting many conspiracy theories" because this yields a "synergistic gain" for the government from reducing "the legitimating effect of rebutting any one of them". So by introducing nonsense such as no-planes - or material such as the theory that Paul McCartney was killed and replaced with an impostor - into the debate, they distract from the real issues such as proof of Israeli foreknowledge, they get Sunstein's "synergistic gain" for the government, they have outsiders perceiving the truth movement as a bunch of fruitcakes who are not worth looking into, and it provides an ideal environment for the COINTELPRO operatives to accuse honest truth tellers of being disinformation "agents", thereby sowing mistrust and divisions amongst the government's critics.

Despite the various counterintelligence measures by the CIA, MI5, the Bush admin, Netanyahu's chum Rupert Murdoch and his relatives, Cass Sunstein, Jim Fetzer, Gordon Duff, Simon Hytten, Hasbara, the US military, government assets such as convicted pedophiles, and many others that are too numerous to mention, the 9/11 Truth movement was making good progress by 2007/2008 with organizations such as Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, and Firefighters for 9/11 Truth. Larry Silverstein was starting to feel the heat for his insurance scam, and it was only a very short step from Silverstein to his friend Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel and the Mossad. As Dr. Alan Sabrosky, the former Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute at the US Army War College has said, 9/11 is an "all-or-nothing exercise" for the Zionists, because if they lose it, "they're done". They can't afford to have Israel's central role exposed, with the ensuing removal of Israel from political maps of the world, the banning of groups such as the ADL and their classification as terrorist organizations, and the trials for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

It's quite possible, but not proven, that the "Great Recession" of the late 2000s decade was engineered (e.g. by way of a run on the "shadow banking" system resulting in a restriction of liquidity) to save Israel. For one thing, it would serve as a distraction. More importantly, it would allow a counter-argument to allegations of Silverstein profiting from his insurance scam. Zionist apologists would be running around the internet like headless chickens, telling everyone how 'poor' old Silverstein had actually "lost" money because - owing to the recession - he couldn't get tenants for the new towers. In reality, Silverstein had received $4.55 billion of insurance money that more than adequately compensated for the $3.2 billion lease and his $14 million down payment. He'd made damn sure the lease contract included an escape clause that specifically addressed terrorism, stating that in the event of terrorist attacks he could still collect on the insurance but his consortium would effectively be freed from their obligations. And he'd made a clear profit on WTC7 because he got another $861 million insurance payout for the old WTC7, the new WTC7 cost $670 million to build, and its value swelled to $940 million by 2011 because it was fully leased. And he'd made damn sure he and his children didn't turn up for work at the WTC on 9/11/01.

(Amusingly, one of the Zionist deceivers was posting away on YouTube under multiple accounts including PoetryHound, PoetryPound, PoetryWound (the latter two claiming to be from "Taiwan"), buddyfreakinhoIIy [that's uppercase i's], bagintree, Stacey Animacie, xianforaday, thx1138aa, etc., and would often forget which one he was supposed to be. He was actually a musician, based in Takoma Park, Maryland, and around the end of October 2012 his posting was disrupted for a time by Hurricane Sandy. If anyone had queried PoetryPound or PoetryWound as to why "they" had stopped posting comments at the same time as the "others", those personae might have explained "their" absence as due to a typhoon! PoetryHound used to spam YouTube by copying and pasting his comments over and over again; when they inevitably got marked as spam and deleted, he claimed it was because he was "being stalked" by someone "using multiple accounts" who was out to get him!!)

As The Wall Street Journal said, September 11, 2008, "Both Mr. Silverstein and Mr. Goldman stand to make enormous profits from the World Trade Center some day by owning three of the five office buildings on the site. Their original investment is no longer at risk because they were repaid the original equity from insurance proceeds in 2003 in exchange for agreeing to new development plans with their landlord, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey." And as The New York Times said, November 22, 2003, "In the end, according to people who have been briefed on the deal, [Silverstein] will have little of his own money at risk for one of the most important corners of the Manhattan landscape.
    'Only in New York can a developer strike a deal with government to get his money back and still walk away with a prime piece of real estate,' said Harvey Robins, who was a top city administrator in the late 1980's and early 1990's."

Later, the disinformation campaign to discredit "conspiracy theorists" would go on to include other preposterous nonsense, such as the claim that the Boston Marathon bombings were "faked" with amputee actors, fake blood and smoke machines.

After the Taliban got in the way of the Zionists' plans for world conquest, the latter needed a patsy that could be connected to Afghanistan. Enter Osama bin Laden, a member of a family with business links to the Bush family, who was dying of kidney disease and in fact died in December 2001, notwithstanding barefaced lies and propaganda to the contrary. It wouldn't matter if Osama repeatedly denied responsibility for 9/11. As reported by the Washington Post in May 2010, the CIA would create tapes in which their "darker-skinned employees" acted the part of "Osama". The actor could claim responsibility for 9/11, or even the Bubonic Plague if so desired. The "Osama" videos and audios, often released at a time that would benefit the Bush regime, such as just before the 2004 election, would be broadcast through the Al Jazeera channel, ostensibly an "Arabic" channel. In fact, Al Jazeera was started in 1996 with a $140 million grant from Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifah Al-Thani, the then Emir of Qatar, an "old friend and business associate" of Dick Cheney, whom he would meet on October 20, 2001 to discuss the "Osama" interviews, after having visited the US from October 2 through to October 5, 2001, where he met with his "old friend" Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, Colin Powell, Rudy Giuliani, Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Myers. (Since Osama was an asset, they had to get rid of John O'Neill, who wanted him dead.)

After the Obama administration decided they could not keep pretending indefinitely that a dead man was still alive by faking audio / still images / blurry video footage, all they needed was to have someone in the Kakul Pakistan Military Academy note some local (within about ten minutes' drive of the Academy) aging gentleman with a beard and turban who could be passed off as "Osama bin Laden", brief Navy SEALs with the photo and con them into thinking it was Osama, have them murder the male members of the family (whose name was Khan) in cold blood, claim one of the victims was "Osama" and another was Osama's "courier", dump "Osama's" body in the ocean and call it "burial at sea", make an unsubstantiated assertion that the identity of "Osama" was confirmed by "DNA analysis" (after all, it sounds scientific and quite fashionable), and have most (22 in fact) of the SEAL Team Six members wiped out in a chopper crash. To any surviving SEALs involved in the killings, it would serve as a warning not to say anything that would demolish the legend. Sure, it might seem odd that "Osama" was supposed to have been living for years right under the nose of Pakistani military intelligence in Abbottabad, but that could be claimed as yet another coincidence. Even if DNA tests were done, they merely needed to obtain a sample from a female family member of the Khan family, send that to the Afghan military lab where it is claimed the tests were done, pass off the female DNA as from a woman known to be bin Laden's "sister", and hey presto, they find a match with the dead Mr. Akbar Khan. Surviving female members of the family were obviously "encouraged" to play along with the official story - after another chopper 'accident' at Abbottabad had conveniently provided a pretext for avoiding bringing any "Osama wives" back to the US for interrogation on grounds that there was "no room". The evidence was thereby eliminated. Moreover, a New York Times article dated May 1, 2011, (just hours before the butchering of the Khan family) on how US aid to Pakistan was in excess of $1 billion annually, provided a thinly veiled threat as to the consequences, should the Pakistani authorities put up more than a token resistance to the US version of events.

Israel's attack on the World Trade Center, which had been leased six weeks prior to its destruction by a consortium headed by Larry Silverstein, a close friend of Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli prime ministers, also served as a casus belli to invade Iraq. Her oil wealth was for the taking, to be siphoned off for the Jewish Mafia and their cronies. But the biggest prize of Afghanistan and Iraq was that they were on the list of the few remaining independent countries who had not come under the Rothschild jackboot of central banks. Meanwhile, in Britain in 2014, the Chilcot Inquiry into Tony Blair's correspondence with George W. Bush was confirmed as a whitewash when it was decided that the letters would not be published in full. In one of the "critical" letters that was written before the March 2003 Commons vote on whether or not to go to war with Iraq, Blair apparently told Bush "You know, George, whatever you decide to do, I'm with you". This letter had mysteriously 'disappeared'.

Events could have been quite different if Clinton had given in to the blackmail, the Taliban hadn't outlawed opium growing, and the Pentagon's accounts were in fine order. The Jewess Monica Lewinsky wouldn't have become a household name, Benjamin Netanyahu wouldn't have traveled to Washington on January 20, 1998, to meet Clinton on the pretext of discussing "troop withdrawal from the West Bank" three days after news broke of the Lewinsky affair on January 17, 1998, Osama bin Laden would have been a relatively minor alleged terrorist whose name everyone had forgotten after he succumbed to kidney failure or a lung infection in December 2001 after having been seen in a military hospital in Rawalpindi for dialysis treatment the night before 9/11/01, there would have been no need to gun down male members of the Khan family of Abbottabad and to have most or all of the assassins killed within months, ostensibly in a chopper crash, the Pentagon wouldn't have been targeted and Dov Zakheim wouldn't have served as Pentagon Comptroller, the Israeli "art students" would have needed to find some "Iraqi" pilots to frame as suicide hijackers or Israel would have needed to concoct some other phony 'evidence' to link Iraq to the WTC attacks, and Saddam Hussein's reprieve of an extra year or two would have gone to Afghanistan instead - although the perps wouldn't have needed to wait for the incoming Bush regime, provided Lewis M. Eisenberg was able to bring forward the WTC privatization. The role of Urban Moving Systems and the "dancing Israelis" would have remained the same.

Those who simply believed everything the TV talking-heads told them about the 9/11 attacks fell into the conspirators' trap of the causal fallacy post hoc ergo propter hoc. They were led to assume: (i) Planes hit Towers, causing fires. (ii) Towers collapse. (iii) Towers collapse because of plane crashes and fires.

Wars are not about "weapons of mass destruction", or bringing "democracy", or because some lone assassin killed an Archduke. Ultimately, wars are fought to enrich private central bankers, whilst impoverishing those who are left alive. Originally, income tax and national debt were supposed to be "temporary" measures for the purpose of fighting some particular war. For example, income tax was introduced in Britain in 1799 to fight French forces under Napoleon, after the cost of war had run up the national debt. It was repealed during times of peace, but that did not last for long. In the US, income tax was first collected as a "temporary" measure in 1862 during the Civil War. The first permanent income tax law was enacted in October 1913, which in a strange "coincidence", happened to be eight months before the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, which led to the outbreak of the Great War a month later in July 1914. Now, we have the worst of all worlds: income tax, sales taxes, "green" taxes, and any other taxes they can concoct, combined with rising national debt, during periods of relative peace in which the wars are against some minor 'enemy' such as the 'evil' "Ayrabs". So today we have this strange 'religion' that has been described as one that "preaches that wealth is no longer created through man's ingenuity and endeavour, but something bestowed upon the grateful congregation by a divine elite. This religion is government, its ministers are politicians and its gospel is debt."

And here are a few of the facts about the London 7/7 bombings in 2005.

On 7/7/05, Israeli operatives had control of when the "security" would exhibit mysterious "faults", which would be timed to coincide with whenever Israel's explosives experts needed to gain access to "passenger platforms and certain remote sections of the track". The Mossad deceptively claimed seven minutes' advance knowledge. The advance knowledge that they had was the time it took them to plan the operation!

Incidentally, Efraim Halevy's comments on the 2005 London 7/7 operation in his 07/07/05 Jerusalem Post article - "careful planning, intelligence gathering, and a sophisticated choice of timing as well as near-perfect execution", look like he was inspired by's comments on the 2001 9/11 operation - "near-perfect operational planning, coordination and execution before their mission", "incredible sophistication and coordination in preparing and executing the attacks". (And we're supposed to believe Halevy's article was something he quickly put together on the same day as the attacks, rather than having prepared it beforehand!!) The best explanation is that Halevy was flattered when he read the independent review of his 2001 handiwork, he came to proudly regard the comments as a description of his own expertise, and then used a paraphrased version for writing about his 2005 operation. Halevy was even more involved than Netanyahu in the 9/11 and 7/7 operations. But as a professional intelligence chief, and not having the motive to boost his popularity in the manner of Netanyahu the politician with comments of how 9/11 was "very good" for Israel and Israel was still "benefiting" from the attacks years later, and how he was so clever that he "predicted" the WTC attacks in 1995, it was very uncharacteristic of Halevy to make any kind of slip-up. Indeed, his reference to "simultaneous" bombings would have been quite consistent with an honest, professional former head of intelligence (albeit still appearing rather like it had been prepared in advance), if only the British authorities hadn't made errors in assessing the timing of the explosions, which they did not manage to correct until two days after the attacks. Moreover, the trail would lead to Netanyahu before it led to Halevy.

There is ample evidence to prove the involvement of the accused, Benjamin Netanyahu, as an architect and key planner of 9/11. Before summing up the case, for those who haven't read the previous page in this trilogy, we should briefly describe how the global hierarchy has evolved over the past 120 years or so, which will show how the perpetrators were able to get away with the 9/11 operation for more than a decade. (See this page for full details of the conspiracy.) There is a shadow government, a global Jewish crime syndicate bent on world domination, that pulls the strings of our so-called 'leaders' and shapes public opinion through its control of mainstream media outlets.

"Zionism" was sold as a program to get the Jews a homeland. Right back in the 1890s in the early days of Zionism, just as today, it was alleged that the Jews had always been "persecuted". The fact that Zionism persists even in the 2010s, nearly 70 years after the illegitimate annexing of Palestine to create the apartheid, terrorist, white phosphorus-loving, cluster bomb-loving, Gentile-hating State of Israel, which has had to deny its murderous acts and dastardly intrigues more times than most people have had hot dinners, shows that the "get a homeland" story was a pack of lies. In fact, the Jewish Mafia needed their own sovereign state as a springboard to their goal of establishing an international despotism, with the world ruled by Jewish fanatics.

Zionism was never anything other than a Machiavellian program for world domination, parts of which were plagiarised from an 1864 book by French writer Maurice Joly entitled The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu. Alphonse Rothschild became aware of the book around 1889, and arranged for several Jewish writers to copy the program and set it out in a manuscript that became known as The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. The Zionist Jewish supremacist program included the following (for "us", "our", read "the Zionist shadow government['s]"):

For example, as evidence that they have achieved their goal of replacing rulers who represent the people by presidents and prime ministers who are merely puppets in their hands, barely the width of a cigarette paper separates the policies of the major political parties. The leaders will never do what is in the interests of the people, but they will always do what is in the interests of the Jewish Mafia. It doesn't matter however many protest against policies such as war against Iraq; the leaders will simply do as they've been told. As for the bias of the press, that should be clear enough from their slavish, unquestioning adherence to the "Arabs did 9/11" lunacy.

Around 1889, at the time Rothschild set up his "Zionism" project, he became aware that merchants from countries such as Russia were pirating his brand of fine wines; they were bottling cheap wine and selling it with forged "Lafite Rothschild" labels on the bottles. This gave him the idea of making the plagiarism from Joly's book (and another work, Biarritz by Hermann Goedsche aka "Sir John Retcliffe", first published in 1868) so blindingly obvious that in the event of discovery they could claim the Protocols was a "forgery", and blame it on "anti-Semites", the "Okhrana" (Russian secret police), or whatever scapegoat they could think of at the time.

As 'evidence' that it was a "forgery", they would have "eyewitnesses" testifying such as Princess Catherine Radziwill (1858-1941), a convicted forger and jailbird, who'd been involved in numerous scams such as claiming in 1900 to have been robbed of jewellery worth ten thousand pounds when in fact the "stolen" 'jewels' were merely paste, and the real jewels were in a safe place; passing checks to the aggregate amount of 29,000 pounds ($200,000) and signing them with the name of Cecil Rhodes, for which she was sentenced to two years' imprisonment in 1902 at the House of Correction, after being convicted on 24 counts of forgery; "abusing the confidence of shopkeepers on a large scale" in Paris in 1904; held in $1,000 bail after failing to pay a hotel bill of $1,239 in December 1921, etc. Another of Jewry's "witnesses", a friend of Radziwill, was Mrs. Henrietta Hurlbut, who needed money around late 1920 to early 1921 (Hurlbut testified March 1921 in support of Jewry's "forgery" claim), because she was involved in a legal battle to try and win a share of a $1.7 million legacy from the estate of Mrs. Frank Leslie (Baroness de Bazus). And another "witness", Comte du Chayla, was a two-faced hypocrite who narrowly escaped being hanged for treason when he was found to be acting as a Bolshevik agent whilst officially Chief of Propaganda on the Staff of the Don Cossack Corps of General Wrangel's Army, and would combine statements of hatred towards the Jews such as "One must have a good pogrom in Russia" with testimony in favor of Jewry's false allegations about the Okhrana "forging" the Protocols. This sort of character, that is bought and paid for, is typical of those who testify for World Jewry, whether in the 1920s to 1930s, or 2001 when they need someone to claim "there was no explosives in the van" and a "hijacker's" passport was "discovered".

We are supposed to believe that World Jewry continued to bring out Radziwill as their star witness from 1921 right up to the 1934/1935 Berne "trial" on the Protocols, throughout all that time believing her to be an honest and truthful person whose testimony could be relied upon, despite the fact that her long record of dishonesty was thoroughly documented in the Jewish-owned New York Times. Surely there must have been someone in World Jewry who could see through her facade!

One of the more amusing aspects of Jewry's "the Okhrana forged the Protocols of Zion" crackpot conspiracy theory is that we are supposed to believe the Russian secret police are hard at work in Paris in 1905 forging an anti-Semitic tract for political purposes, and then these professional spies inexplicably decide to reveal their secret plot to a woman who has just been exposed in the press in April of the previous year as a destitute confidence trickster who deceives shopkeepers, and who has only been released from jail in August 1903 (after time off for supposed ill-health and frailty; Radziwill went on to live until 1941) for crimes of forgery, fraud, bribery and blackmail. Not only that, they show it to the fraudster's friends, too!

Incidentally, Jewry's blatant lie about the Okhrana "forging" the Protocols is not even believed by mainstream historians Charles A. Ruud and Sergei A. Stepanov; for example, see their book Fontanka 16.

To sum up the case, Israeli foreknowledge of the WTC attacks is a proven fact, as established by the actions of the High-Fivers, Dominik Suter, Larry Silverstein, the Zim American-Israeli Shipping Company, and an unspecified person from Herzliya, Israel, who sent an instant message via the Israeli firm Odigo, providing two hours' advance warning of the attacks on the WTC. It is corroborated by much more.

The High-Fivers were already at Doric at a time that is chronologically impossible if they had learned of the first plane crash whilst at the Urban Moving office or warehouse in Weehawken, decided to take time off work, made a 4- or 5-minute drive in their employer's van in the rush hour, etc. Not only were all of their alibis that supposedly showed they were elsewhere at the time of the first impact physically impossible, they all contradicted each other. And these alibis, such as Yaron Shmuel's claim about being on the "West Side Highway" at the time of the "incident", showed just how desperate they were to cover up the fact that they were already at Doric at the time of that "incident", i.e., the first plane crash, so they could take video footage of both crashes, and indulge in some high-fiving and "horsing around", taking still photographs ("selfies") with the burning tower in the background, during the break. They knew it was a terrorist attack from the get-go, when innocent bystanders thought the first crash was simply a terrible accident, and so the High-Fivers were happy, and not at all shocked by what innocent bystanders considered to be a shocking event. Oded Ellner admitted that they'd chosen to go to Doric because it "gave them a view of the entire length of both towers". The top of the North Tower - which the first plane had targeted - was perfectly visible from the roof of Urban Moving Systems in Weehawken, whereas the South Tower could not be seen from there because it was obscured by the North Tower. The decision to go to Doric was clearly taken prior to the second plane crash, since it is not in dispute that the High-Fivers were seen at Doric before the second plane crash. Ellner "apologized for appearing happy in the photographs", and, to further confirm the obvious fact that the Israelis were happy because they already knew it was a terrorist attack before the second plane crash, attempted to justify their jovial state when he "stated that Israel has been dealing with incidents like this for years." Moreover, Ellner revealed that he already knew that the "incident" (as described by Shmuel) would lead to a change in US foreign policy, as he added that he "believes that the United States will take steps to stop terrorism in the world." Sivan Kurzberg was seen at Doric posing as a "construction worker" the day before 9/11/01.

The Israelis knew that their mission would be completed by 9/11/01, which is why they were found to be in possession of airline tickets to leave the US from JFK International Airport, New York City on September 12, 2001, on Olympic Airways Flight  412 at 17:45 bound for Athens, Greece, whereupon they would catch a second flight to arrive in Tel Aviv, Israel on the morning of September 14. They were also carrying  passports and $4,700 in cash. There was evidence "linking these Israelis to 9-11", and that evidence had to be classified, which would not have been necessary if it did not link them to the attacks. They were found to be in possession of maps with certain places highlighted that tied them in to the attacks, which is probably at least part of the aforementioned evidence. Similarly, the massive amount of redactions and missing documents in the FBI High-Fivers report would not have been necessary if the content did not demonstrate Israeli foreknowledge.

Dominik Suter already knew by lunchtime of 9/11/01, before his employees were arrested for "puzzling behavior" at 3:56 pm that afternoon, that his company Urban Moving Systems had become redundant as a Mossad intelligence front. The 9/11 mission had been completed by lunchtime on 9/11/01, and so that is when Suter made the decision to close Urban Moving Systems and fire his workers, as confirmed by Omer Marmari. Moreover, Suter's mother-in-law made a transaction on a Florida property on Friday, 9/7/01, four days prior to the attacks, consistent with knowledge that the family would need to flee to Israel within days of the attacks and a consequent settling up of personal affairs. Larry Silverstein and Frank Lowy knew that the end of July would be a good time to take over the lease on the Twin Towers and its retail space, and to insure against multiple terrorists attacks to the tune of billions of dollars, to cover business interruption and rebuilding costs. They were fully aware that their businesses would soon be interrupted. Moreover, Silverstein knew that he and his children had to stay away from the WTC on the morning of 9/11/01, and needed some sort of excuse, such as a "dermatologist's appointment", or a claim about "running late". The Zim American-Israeli Shipping Company was aware that September 4, 2001 would be a good time to move out of the World Trade Center, even if it meant a financial loss from breaking the terms of their lease and there was no credible business reason for them to make such a move if they didn't know that the building was going to be demolished one week later in a terrorist attack. Some unknown Israeli intelligence operative based in Herzliya, Israel was aware that the WTC was about to be targeted, two hours prior to the first plane crash, when he or she sent the warning message to New York City.

The government's account of events is riddled with absurdities, impossibilities, and a long chain of improbable 'coincidences'. Moreover, the so-called 'evidence' that supposedly supports it is readily dismissed as planted 'evidence', confessions under torture, phony videos and lies by government officials, supported by a compliant media. The LIHOP scenario fails to eliminate most of the problems with the official narrative. The MIHOP scenario is an elegant hypothesis, because the improbable 'coincidences' transform into a series of clues that point to the identity of the perpetrators, and far from improbable, become a perfectly normal, expected part of the causal chain of events. The absurdities evaporate, and the physical impossibilities become not only possible, but integral parts of the plot that are probable or even inevitable.

Members of the Bush administration were certainly involved in 9/11, particularly in the Pentagon sub-plot. However, a rogue government could not have got away with such deception; the press and the opposition would have taken great delight in exposing them, and the perpetrators would have been swinging from lampposts within a matter of months. All roads lead to Israel, or to be more specific, an international criminal organization of racist, elite 'Jews' (actually an Asiatic tribe of Khazars who, sadly, migrated to the West to their gain and everyone else's loss) bent on world domination, aided by the agencies of the State of Israel such as the Mossad. The State of Israel is the regime that has occupied Palestine since 1948 in order to serve as a springboard to world domination and as a terrorist training camp and a sanctuary for terrorists, swindlers and sex offenders. As outlined above, the global Jewish Mafia are a shadow government by way of their ownership of mainstream media outlets and political 'leaders' of the major parties in the so-called Western "democracies", and this is how they managed to get away with 9/11 for more than ten years.

Those involved in the Zionist project have consistently used deception and terrorism to achieve their ends. Jews dressed as Arabs blew up the King David Hotel in 1946, killing 92. They also plotted to assassinate British foreign secretary Ernest Bevin; fortunately the conspiracy was foiled by MI6. In 1954, Israel was caught orchestrating false-flag terrorism in Egypt in an attempt to blame it on the Muslims for political gain. In 1964, according to the best evidence, Israeli intelligence was involved in John F. Kennedy's assassination, one motive being that JFK was opposed to Israel building nuclear weapons. In 1967, Israel carried out a sustained, unprovoked attack on the USS Liberty, obviously attempting to sink the ship and blame it on the Egyptians. The political and military benefits from simply being able to blame it on the Egyptians and have the US join Israel in its Six-Day War was a powerful motive; another possibility is that the Liberty, an intelligence ship, had gathered information that Israel wanted to keep under wraps, such as Israel's cold-blooded murdering of hundreds of Egyptian POWs who were ordered to dig their own graves in the 1967 war. By that time, the US had a president (Lyndon Johnson) who was a compliant stooge of the Jewish Mafia. When planes were launched from US aircraft carriers to go to the aid of the Liberty, Johnson ordered them to turn back, and he declared, "I don't give a damn if every man drowns and the ship sinks. I don't want to embarrass our allies." In 1987, Jonathan Pollard was convicted and jailed for life for spying and supplying Israel with US top-secret military information, which is believed to have been traded to the Soviets for political gain.

In September 1997, members of the Mossad's Kidon (bayonet) unit arrived in Jordan. Two of them travelling with fake Canadian passports were assigned to murder Hamas leader Khaled Mashal. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu chaired the Israeli "Committee X" that decided on the "assassination". As in Operation Susannah, the plan went badly wrong. The attempt to poison Mashal with nerve gas was interrupted before he was killed outright, the two Mossad assassins were arrested, and four of their teammates ended up trapped in the Israeli Embassy in Amman. Israel had to bargain for their release by providing an antidote to save Mashal and by freeing another Hamas leader and other prisoners. Netanyahu only agreed to provide the antidote after pressure from Bill Clinton. Efraim Halevy was sent in to defuse the situation and get the Israelis out. For his handling of the affair, Halevy was awarded the job of Director of the Mossad.

Thus, in September 1997, when Dominik Suter's Urban Moving Systems had already been registered as a New Jersey company in April of that year, the fireproofing on Floor 94 of WTC1 had already been replaced, and the accused Benjamin Netanyahu had already "predicted" that "militant Islam" would bring down the WTC, he was working with Efraim Halevy on murderous Mossad operations involving fake passports. In 2005, on the day of the London 7/7 bombings, Netanyahu was not only in London but had advance knowledge of the plot, and Halevy inadvertently revealed his intimate knowledge of the operation when he wrote that same day in the Jerusalem Post that the bombings were "simultaneous". The British authorities believed for the next two days that the explosions had occurred over a period of 26 minutes from 08:51 to 09:17, and did not manage to deduce that they were simultaneous until July 9.

The accused, Benjamin Netanyahu attained the rank of captain in Sayeret Matkal, as did Daniel Lewin, a so-called "passenger" on Flight 11 who "knew how to fight with knives and take knives away from people", and "loved jumping out of planes". He was educated at MIT, as was Lewin. He lived in Denver and Jerusalem, as did Lewin. Satam al-Suqami, a so-called "terrorist" who was allegedly on Flight 11, later turned up alive and said his passport had been stolen in 1995 when his Denver apartment was burgled. Netanyahu was a close friend of Larry Silverstein, who secured 12-layer, 22-company insurance to cover the WTC buildings against terrorist attacks aggregating $3,546,809,904 "per occurrence", to include property damage and business interruption, less than six weeks before the buildings were destroyed in two "occurrences" of terrorist attacks, and the business was "interrupted".

In 1991, when the Jewish Mafia was plotting its new divide and conquer strategy, and deciding upon a new 'enemy' for the Western "democracies", the Muslims - a target of Zionist Jews' hatred - was the obvious choice. Israeli security officials inspected the underground garage of the Zim American-Israeli Shipping Company, and saw that it was vulnerable to a car or truck bomb. The accused Benjamin Netanyahu is the son of Benzion Netanyahu, who died in 2012 and:

Thus, the accused, Benjamin Netanyahu has terrorism in his blood. Even in 1996, when he first became prime minister of Israel, he was already noted for having had a "20-year obsession with terrorism". And in 1996, a report was prepared for him entitled A Clean Break, which advocated "removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq". On the 60th anniversary of the King David Hotel bombing in 2006, he proudly participated in a two-day seminar commemorating the bombing. His father-in-law Shmuel Ben-Artzi was a member of the Irgun and the Haganah terrorist groups.

The accused, Benjamin Netanyahu, was a BSc-qualified architect and had access to blueprints of the WTC - either from his close friend Larry Silverstein, who built the original WTC7 in 1987, or from Lewis M. Eisenberg, a member of the Planning Board of UJA/United Jewish Federation and the Chairman of the Board of Commissioners of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Netanyahu had the skills and the information that would enable him to calculate that it was necessary to take out five contiguous floors in a Tower before the lack of bracing would raise the slenderness ratio of enough core columns above the critical slenderness ratio, such that Euler buckling and global collapse of the tower would ensue.

On the evening of 9/11/01, Netanyahu declared that the attack was "very good" for relations between the US and Israel because of how it would "generate immediate sympathy" and "strengthen the bond" between the US and Israeli people, now that the US had "experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror". In April 2008, when Netanyahu decided he'd like a second term as premier and wanted to remind his backers of how he'd helped Israel, he told an audience at Bar Ilan University that Israel was still "benefiting" from the "attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon" because of how the event had "swung American public opinion in our favor". Within a couple of months of 9/11/01 Omer Marmari, one of the arrested Israelis, had told the FBI that "Israel now has hope that the world will now understand us" (Exhibit 1, Section 3, p. 65).

It is the prosecution's case that in 1995, when the accused Benjamin Netanyahu published a "prediction" that "militant Islam" would bring down the WTC, he was already heavily involved in planning a false-flag terror operation that would bring down the WTC and blame "militant Islam" for the crime, a false-flag terror operation that would very quickly prove to be "very good" for Israel because of its effect on US foreign policy, Israel would be the "big winner", and Israel would be "benefiting" from the operation for years to come.

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, if you answer yes to all or nearly all of the following questions, you will have to find the defendant not guilty.

  1. Do you believe the High-Fivers were capable of time-travel, or had psychic powers of precognition?
  2. Do you believe the High-Fivers and dozens of art students were acting alone without assistance from the State of Israel, and were capable of tracking Arab hijackers and intercepting their communications with such expertise that they knew to the minute when the North and South Towers would be struck, when none of the alphabet soup intelligence agencies with their vast budgets were capable of doing the same, and the High-Fivers and art students inexplicably refused to warn anyone because they wanted to benefit Israel when they were not getting any help themselves from that State?
  3. Do you find it feasible that a red bandana would remain in pristine condition when the "hijacker" it was supposedly attached to, the plane, and the remainder of the plane's contents were reduced to scrap, and Israeli "movers" were seen travelling to the crash site on 9/11/01?
  4. Do you believe it is feasible that a passport could become separated from 100 tons of aircraft debris - including the "hijacker" who is supposedly carrying the passport on a domestic flight - as a plane smashes into a tower 1,200 feet about the ground, get soaked in jet fuel, survive a fireball and float to the ground in pristine condition just like it has come off the Mossad's production line, whilst managing to circumvent the laws of aerodynamics and be "discovered" at a location where it could not have been discovered, a couple of weeks after the local police commissioner has been on a four-day trip to Israel where he meets a billionaire who subsequently gives him a $250,000 "loan", and he has $236,000 of rent paid between 2001 and 2003 by another businessman with connections to Israel?
  5. Do you believe a "very bad pilot" who "could not fly at all", was too "incompetent to fly alone", "could not handle basic air maneuvers", failed his driving test and could not remember his PIN, would be capable of performing a 330-degree descending right turn just before flying the final mile at 530 mph whilst controlling the pitch with such precision that the accuracy was better than 3 arc minutes from a mile out, to have the engines clear the Pentagon lawn by a couple of feet?
  6. Do you believe a skinny, barely over five feet tall, shy non-pilot and his "slender in build" accomplices who were "not physically imposing" would be capable of commandeering a Boeing 757 including subduing the passengers and flight crew, and persuading tough, highly trained, weightlifting former Navy fighter pilot Charles Burlingame to hand over control of his aircraft to a bunch of weedy hijackers before he could take two or three seconds to squawk the hijacking code, with the hijackers then going on to switch off the transponders?
  7. Do you find it feasible that gambling, pork chop-loving, strip club-frequenting, red Pontiac-driving, video-gaming, vodka-swilling, cocaine-snorting hedonists would have such a vehement hatred of Western culture that they are motivated to kill themselves and thousands of others?
  8. Do you believe criminals would steal the identities of people with their own name, place and date of birth and occupation?
  9. Do you believe that if terrorists had stolen identities of people with names other than their own, an honest government that was telling the truth about the events of 9/11/01 would continue to lie by claiming that the terrorists with the stolen identities were named as according to the stolen identities, rather than telling us the real identities of the terrorists?
  10. Do you think it likely that a highly-trained former Sayeret Matkal ("The Unit") Captain who often spent as much time weightlifting as on his schoolwork, could bench-press more than 300 pounds, squat close to 500 pounds, could run around in a paintball game with his colleague over his shoulder like he weighed nothing, and "knew how to fight with knives and take knives away from people", would be a passenger on a hijacked flight and the first casualty of a group of five hijackers, including two who nearly missed their connecting flight, who must also subdue 11 crew members and 76 passengers, persuade ex-US Air Force pilot John Ogonowski to hand over control of his plane without tapping in the 4-digit code for a hijacking, and tell them the codes to switch off the transponders?
  11. Do you find it feasible that three steel-framed high-rises collapsed from office fires on the same day, when it has never happened before and never happened since?
  12. Do you find it feasible that a 47-story steel-framed high-rise that was never hit by a plane and whose owner would go on to make $ hundreds of millions profit from the insurance and swelling in value of the replacement building as it filled up with new tenants, whose tenants at the time included the CIA, the DoD, the US Secret Service, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and Mayor Giuliani's Office of Emergency Management, would collapse from office fires into a pile of rubble a few stories high containing partly evaporated steel because of a bizarre sequence of events including "thermal expansion" of fireproofed steel beams after the fires allegedly responsible had burned themselves out, shear studs that were not there (according to NIST in August 2008) when they should have been (according to NIST in June 2004), the pushing of a single critical girder off its support when at the required temperature the floor beams would have lost rigidity and sagged thereby relieving the pressure from expansion, a cascade of floor failures, the failure of a single critical column without which the building could not remain standing, when buildings like that are engineered not to rely on a single critical girder or column, and that an eyewitness would lie about being trapped in the building by early explosions prior to the collapse of either tower, and, in a strange "coincidence", would then go on to die mysteriously, two days before NIST was to release the long-awaited first draft of its "thermal expansion" theory of the building's collapse?
  13. Do you think it likely that two 110-story skyscrapers that had been designed to survive a collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707 or DC-8) travelling at 600 miles per hour that dumped "all the fuel [...] into the building" creating "a horrendous fire" would both collapse within two hours, after being hit by planes that were less massive (taking into account that at 10,000 gallons the fuel was filled to less than half capacity) and were both flying at a lower speed, with about half the fuel being consumed in a fireball outside the building, and considering that such buildings are massively over-engineered to avoid the catastrophe of collapse?
  14. Do you believe that office fires in steel-framed high-rises would leave rivers of running, flowing molten steel weeks after the event, and, minutes before those office fires brought about the total collapse of one of the 110-story skyscrapers, would generate a powerful flow of tons of molten material of orange-yellow appearance, which is indicative of an iron-rich melt and consistent with temperatures at ~1,000 °C or more whilst totally at odds with office fires and molten "aluminum"?
  15. Do you believe that, on the Earth's surface in the 20th and 21st centuries, the laws of physics sometimes fluctuate or are temporarily suspended, e.g., depending on whether or not the "evil spirits" of "Muslim" terrorists are in limbo, exerting a malign influence as they are about to descend to "Hell"?
  16. Do you think that the scientific method involves refusing to allow peer review or independent replication of work regarding building collapses by refusing to provide details of the input parameters for computer models, on grounds that such release would "jeopardize public safety"?
  17. Do you believe that politicians who lied about "weapons of mass destruction" and their reasons for going to war can be trusted to tell the truth about events such as 9/11?
  18. Do you think it is reasonable that in the second half of September, 2001, a pale, thin, 6' 4" to 6' 6" tall, left-handed man of olive complexion called Osama would repeatedly deny responsibility for the 9/11 attacks, including a statement that "I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people", that Dick Cheney's "old friend and business associate" the Emir of Qatar, founder of the "Arabic" channel Al-Jazeera, would visit the US from October 2 through to October 5, 2001, to meet Cheney along with George W. Bush, Colin Powell, Rudy Giuliani, Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Myers, then meet his pal Cheney again on October 20 to discuss the "Osama" interviews, that the left-handed, thin, tall man would be reported as having died in December 2001, that the CIA would go on to admit having created tapes in which their "darker-skinned employees" acted the roles of "Osama" and his cronies, that a video would luckily be found in Jalalabad, a city with a population estimated at roughly 250,000 as of 1999, the video would feature a well-built, dark-skinned, right-handed man with a beard and turban admitting responsibility for the 9/11 attacks, that these fearsome terrorists would choose to broadcast the tape through Dick Cheney's chum's Al-Jazeera "Arabic" channel, along with further tapes that were broadcast whenever Bush needed to boost his popularity (such as just before the 2004 election), and each "Osama" is really the same man; he just happened to be ambidextrous, had a fluctuating weight and height, a variable skin color, was a staunch Republican, and was prone to changing his mind?
  19. Do you think it is merely a strange "coincidence" that a Zionist Rabbi who was co-signatory of a paper about the 'benefits' of a "new Pearl Harbor", and whose company was the market leader in Flight Termination Systems that would enable remote operators such as ace fighter pilots to hijack several in-flight aircraft at a distance of hundreds of miles, and fly them into tall buildings or the Pentagon via a Command Transmitter System, would be appointed Pentagon Comptroller, the year after it become public knowledge that the Pentagon's finances were in such "disarray" that almost $7 trillion of bookkeeping adjustments had been required in order to balance the accounts, with $2.3 trillion of those corrections lacking receipts, that within months of that Rabbi taking office as Comptroller, a "very bad pilot" who "could not fly at all", failed his driving test and could not remember his PIN, and was refused permission to fly a Cessna alone, would fly a Boeing 757 like an ace fighter pilot, with the aircraft clearing the lawn by a couple of feet and happening to target the accounts section, and exactly six months after the attack, on March 11, 2002, at 09:38, the very time to the minute at which the plane impacted the Pentagon, the Rabbi would be joined by approximately 500 co-religionists from 40 countries on the Pentagon lawn as they sang to commemorate the attack?
  20. Do you think it reasonable that a high-spending, money-worshipping, cocaine-snorting, vodka-swilling, strip joint-frequenting, gambling, pork chop-eating, video gaming, sneakers/jeans-wearing, red Pontiac-driving Arab could have been persuaded to kill himself on grounds that because he'd been such a devout Muslim, "Allah" would reward him by sending him to a paradise where he would get to be with 72 virgins?
  21. Do you believe a religious fanatic who lived in a cave and couldn't afford a decent video camera could afford to recruit high-spending, money-worshipping, cocaine-snorting, vodka-swilling, strip club-frequenting, gambling, pork chop-eating, video gaming, sneakers/jeans-wearing, red Pontiac-driving suicide terrorists?
  22. Do you find it feasible that a ragtag of terrorists armed with box cutters, recruited by a cave-dwelling fanatic who couldn't afford a decent video camera, would manage to outwit the Pentagon and all the alphabet soup agencies, and bring down two 110-story buildings, a 47-story building, and a section of the Pentagon?
  23. Do you find it reasonable that brilliant military tacticians, who could outwit the Pentagon and all the alphabet soup agencies and bring down skyscrapers and attack the Pentagon, would make a terrible strategic blunder by providing Zionist forces with a casus belli to invade Islamist nations and launch a "war on terror" that serves as a massive land grab, an excuse to loot Iraq's oil wealth, and a pretext for more repressive government policies such as snooping on citizens, the year after the neoconservative think tank PNAC published a paper calling for a "new Pearl Harbor"?
  24. Do you believe that, in a mission to strike the "infidels" that's been years in the planning, the lead suicide pilot and a muscle hijacker, despite the fact that they were already in Boston on September 10, 2001, would risk jeopardizing the whole operation by driving to Portland in a rented Nissan, staying overnight, and nearly missing their connecting flight back to Boston?
  25. Do you find it plausible that a kamikaze pilot with a rented Mitsubishi at Boston, whose destination is Boston but had decided to go to Portland, would leave the Mitsubishi at Boston, rent a Nissan to drive 106 miles to Portland, leave the Nissan and catch a flight to Boston and have his baggage sent there, rather than continue to use the Mitsubishi for at least part of the trip?
  26. Do you believe a kamikaze pilot would not be able to make up his mind as to whether or not he intended his will to be found, and would therefore leave the will in baggage that would be found if it didn't make it onto the plane, and would not be found if it did make it onto the plane?
  27. Do you think a kamikaze pilot who was normally happy to give his name as Mohamed Atta would rent a Nissan in the name of Adnan or Ameer Bukhari to make a trip to Portland?
  28. Do you think it feasible that Abdulaziz al-Omari used a stolen identity of someone with the same name and birth date for buying his flight ticket, but gave his name as one of the Bukharis for making a trip to Portland in a Nissan?
  29. Is it reasonable that Satam al-Suqami, Waleed al-Shehri and Wail al-Shehri stole the identities of Adnan Bukhari, Ameer Bukhari and Amer Kamfar when booking their suicide flights, when Mohamed Atta and Abdulaziz al-Omari used the two Bukharis' identities for renting a Nissan to Portland, but gave their real names to go onto the flight manifests?
  30. Do you find it feasible that Satam al-Suqami would use a stolen identity of another name for booking his flight, but carried with him on that domestic flight a passport in his real name?
  31. Do you believe that Arab hijackers would deliberately plant a trail of 'evidence' pointing to Arabs as the perpetrators, so that it would speed up the US military response by providing a casus belli to wage war on Muslim nations, and at the same time, these suicide hijackers would choose to avoid basking in the glory as "martyrs" by framing other Arabs for the deed?
  32. Do you think that nineteen Arab hijackers would be able to board four planes at three different airports, never being seen by any eyewitness, and never being captured on camera apart from one "surveillance video" allegedly for Dulles, Washington, that lacked any time and date stamps, did not emerge until nearly 3 years after the event, and is of such dubious quality - the report admits, "Details in the grainy video are difficult to distinguish" - that it is evidence against, rather than for, Arab hijackers?
  33. Do you think the 9/11 terrorists' "near-perfect operational planning, coordination and execution", knowledge of "how to avoid detection by the National Security Agency and other technical intelligence outfits while organizing outside the United States", knowledge of "how to avoid suspicion once in the United States" and "sophisticated understanding of how U.S. intelligence works" is consistent with them leaving "an astonishing amount of clues in their wake" and "what would appear to be obvious mistakes on the part of the suspects, such as holding onto 'dirty' credit cards"?
  34. Do you consider it reasonable that, of all the cameras at the Pentagon and at gas stations, etc., not one of them showed a plane about to hit the Pentagon?
  35. Do you disagree with the following analysis? As the alleged Flight 77 was ten miles out from the Pentagon, a young man asked Vice President Cheney, "Do the orders still stand?" Cheney turned and whipped his neck around and replied, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?" Since the time of the Pentagon strike was 9:37:45, Cheney admitted that he gave no shoot down orders until some time between 10:10 and 10:15, and Bush did not authorise those until at least 10:18, and since there was no attempt to shoot down the object that struck the Pentagon, it follows that "the orders" were stand down rather than shoot down orders.
  36. Do you find it feasible that a caveman, who denied responsibility for 9/11 and couldn't even afford a decent video camera, could recruit nineteen suicide hijackers and pilots who, although none of them had ever hijacked a plane before, were so good at hijacking on their first attempt that all four groups, after having subdued the passengers and the flight crew, despite being greatly outnumbered, only armed with box cutters, and "not physically imposing" in appearance, managed to prevent the pilot or co-pilot from taking a couple of seconds to punch in the 4-digit hijacking code, and then managed on all four planes to turn off the transponders, as would be expected if the planes had been electronically hijacked with Flight Termination Systems?
  37. Do you find it perfectly logical that a tiny little country the size of New Jersey that is the only "democracy" in the Middle East, and is so vulnerable and down on its luck that it needs more aid per capita from the US federal government than the government returns to the average American citizen, could have so much political clout that it can carry out a sustained attack on a US ship that killed 34 and injured 171, even shooting at the life rafts, and then have the US President declare, "I don't give a damn if every man drowns and the ship sinks. I don't want to embarrass our allies", and have the whole thing officially dismissed as an "accident", and then in 2001 would be able to have the US and other nations fighting wars on its behalf for an eventual cost of $4 trillion to $6 trillion for the US alone, along with thousands of troops killed and many more injured and disabled, and millions of civilians killed or displaced in the targeted nations?
  38. Do you find it feasible that a group of people who had indulged in terrorism such as the King David Hotel bombing in 1946 to get their own sovereign state, who after having tricked the international community into awarding them Palestine, indulged in false-false terrorism in Egypt for political gain in 1954, ordered hundreds of Egyptian POWs to line up and dig their own graves before shooting each batch in turn from behind in June 1967, and at the same time, launched an unprovoked, sustained attack against a US intelligence ship in international waters that killed 34 and injured 171, and claimed it was an "accident" despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, shot down a Libyan passenger airliner in 1973 killing 108 people, tricked Ronald Reagan into attacking Libya in 1986 after broadcasting deceptive messages supposedly originating from that country, had their operatives arrive in Jordan with fake Canadian passports in 1997 and carried out a botched attempted murder, have an intelligence agency known as the Mossad, which was described in a study by the Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS), as reported in the Washington Times of September 10, 2001, as: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act", was caught with guns, grenades, dynamite, detonators and wiring in a failed attempt to blow up the Mexican Congress on October 10, 2001, three days after the launch of the War in Afghanistan, was caught on October 11, 2001 with a Sony video camera and tape with detailed video footage of Chicago's Sears Tower, three days after a bizarre incident involving a Californian man who burst into the cockpit of an American Airlines jetliner bound for Chicago's O'Hare airport, screaming, "We're going to crash into the Sears Tower" and that terrorists were "steering" the plane towards the Sears Tower, was caught again in the last weekend in October 2001 in the Midwest and found to have "box cutters and other equipment", plus photos and descriptions of a nuclear power plant in Florida and the Trans-Alaska pipeline, was caught shortly after midnight on May 7, 2002, with a rental truck that tested positive for TNT and RDX plastic explosives, very close to the Whidbey Island Naval Air Station, Oak Harbor, Wash., murdered a 23-year-old peace activist in March 2003 by running over her with a bulldozer and claimed it was an "accident", fraudulently attempted to obtain a New Zealand passport in the name of a tetraplegic man in 2004, shelled and killed picnicking Palestinians on a Gaza beach on June 9, 2006, including wiping out seven members of one family, and then had the sheer effrontery to claim the Palestinians blew themselves up and their grief was "an act", fired at the very center of the red cross on the roof of two Red Cross ambulances in July 2006 and claimed it was a "mistake", fired directly at a UN observers post in Lebanon in July 2006, killing four UN personnel, after repeatedly promising that the position would be spared from fire, and claimed it was an "accident", stormed a Turkish ship in international waters that was part of a humanitarian aid flotilla and attacked and killed nine unarmed Turkish aid volunteers in May 2010 (and injured many more, one of those injured going on to die after four years in a coma, sustained after one of the 'brave' Israeli "commandos" had shot him in the head; a UN probe found Israel's "wilful killing" had broken international laws, but Israel's own inquiry claimed it was legal), conducted a series of "assassinations" (murders) of Iranian scientists in which they threw magnetic bombs at their cars in 2010, repeatedly attacked Gaza's only power plant throughout the years and claimed it was an "accident", and killed an Iranian general in a January 2015 airstrike and claimed it was an "accident" -- would somehow act totally out of character and decide that 3,000 Americans were worth more than 3,000 head of cattle, and pass up the opportunity to kill them for political gain and financial profit, in spite of overwhelming evidence showing that they did 9/11?
  39. Do you find it feasible that an Israeli prime minister who proudly participated in a two-day seminar in 2006 commemorating the 1946 King David Hotel bombing, "soaked up his father's admiration for Ze'ev Jabotinsky and his doctrine", "was always compelled to prove that he did not fall short of his heroic brother [Jonathan]", "predicted" in 1995 that "militant Islam" would bring down the WTC, was in receipt of a 1996 report entitled A Clean Break that advocated "removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq", declared on the evening of 9/11/01 that the attacks were "very good" for Israel and went on to boast in 2008 of how Israel was still "benefiting" from the attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon, was in London in 2005 on the morning of the 7/7 bombings and had advance knowledge of the attacks, had such close ties with Larry Silverstein that he would call him weekly without fail and met him several times between 1996 and 2001, was a Sayeret Matkal Captain, whose father Benzion was regarded as an "extremist" by King David Hotel bomber Menachem Begin, and whose father-in-law Shmuel Ben-Artzi was a member of the Irgun and the Haganah, is actually a peace-loving hero who wouldn't hurt a fly and always tells the truth?
  40. Do you believe that all of the following are purely coincidental: Visor Consultants' exercise at 9:30 am on the morning of the London 7/7 bombings, based on simultaneous bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened; the Israeli company Verint Systems' provision of video networked "security" for the London Underground, at the time the London Underground was bombed; Benjamin Netanyahu happening to be not only in London on the morning of the 7/7 bombings, but also having foreknowledge of same; Rudy Giuliani happening to be not only in London on the morning of the 7/7 bombings, but also located in Harrogate the preceding day, which is merely twenty miles from a Leeds store that was said to be the origin of a till receipt that was "discovered", allegedly having inexplicably survived the bomb blast, and serving to 'prove' the identity of the "bomber"; Efraim Halevy's immediate knowledge that the 7/7 bombings were "simultaneous", when it took two days for the British authorities to deduce that they were simultaneous; the Mossad's foreknowledge of the 7/7 bombings; the NRO's Chantilly exercise of a plane crashing into one of its towers commencing at 9:00 a.m. on the morning of 9/11; the war games exercises such as Operation Northern Vigilance and Global Guardian that were being staged on the morning of 9/11; the Israeli High-Fivers' decision, in June 2001 or earlier, to book airline tickets to leave the US from JFK International Airport, New York City on September 12, 2001, bound for Greece, along with another flight from Greece to Israel; Paul Kurzberg's decision to give his brother Sivan a camera on the day before 9/11/01; Sivan Kurzberg happening to be at the Doric apartment block on the day before 9/11/01; Dominik Suter's decision to close down Urban Moving Systems and fire his workers at lunchtime on 9/11/01, hours before he learned that some of his employees had got themselves arrested that afternoon; Suter's mother-in-law's decision to make a transaction on a Florida property on Friday, September 7, 2001; the taking over of the WTC lease and securing coverage against multiple terrorist attacks by Jewish businessmen who were friends with Israeli prime ministers, within six weeks of the WTC buildings being destroyed in multiple terrorist attacks; Larry Silverstein's failure to turn up for work at the WTC on the morning of 9/11/01; Silverstein's children's failure to turn up for work at the WTC on the morning of 9/11/01; Benjamin Netanyahu and Flight 11 "passenger" Daniel Lewin both attaining the rank of Captain in Sayeret Matkal, both being educated at MIT, and both having lived in Denver and Jerusalem; the first hijacked plane happening to be Flight 11, which a Sayeret Matkal Captain had flown on more than thirty times in the previous year, knew the numbers of the most comfortable seats, knew the flight crew by name, and knew the aircraft makes and models; the sending of two hours' advance warning of the WTC attacks through the Israeli instant messaging company Odigo, which had an office in Herzliya; the big bad "al Qaeda" terrorists' decision to broadcast their tapes through an "Arabic" channel that was set up by Dick Cheney's old friend and business associate; the bin Laden family happening to be business associates of the Bush family; Ziad al-Jarrah, one of the alleged 9/11 hijackers, happening to be the cousin of Ali al-Jarrah, an Israeli intelligence asset who had received more than $300,000 since 1983 for his "work" as a paid spy for Israel whilst posing as a supporter of the Palestinian cause; Bernard Kerik's meeting with Israeli billionaire Eitan Wertheimer during a four-day trip to Israel on August 26-29, 2001, his subsequent statements that "there was no explosives in the [Israeli] van" and that a "hijacker's" passport had been "discovered", and his subsequent receipt of a $250,000 "loan" from Wertheimer and receipt of $236,000 rent paid by another businessman with links to Israel; the Zim American-Israeli Shipping Company's decision to move out of the WTC on September 4, 2001, one week in advance of 9/11; the fact that two of those listed as killed on Flight 77 - William E. Caswell and John Yamnicky - had worked on "deep-black" projects; the September, 2001 creation of the Hasbara Fellowships by Rabbi Elliot Mathias in New York City; Jerome Hauer's warning to White House staff on the evening of 9/11 to start taking the anthrax antidote Cipro, one week in advance of terrorists launching a US military-grade anthrax letters campaign; the warning sent to Mayor Willie Brown from his "security people at the airport" that "Americans should be cautious about their air travel", late on Monday, September 10, 2001; the internal memo sent around Jewish investment banking firm Goldman Sachs in Tokyo on September 10, 2001 warning of a possible terrorist attack, and recommending that employees avoid any American government buildings; Benjamin Netanyahu's 1995 "prediction" that "militant Islam" would bring down the WTC; Donald Rumsfeld's "prediction" at a breakfast meeting in the Pentagon commencing at 8:00 am on 9/11/01 that some kind of "shocking" world event would occur in the near future; "Atta" being the only Flight 11 passenger whose baggage failed to make it onto the plane; the extraordinary resilience of several "hijacker's" passports (in contrast to the rest of the debris) in emerging unscathed from impacts and fireballs, so they could be cited as 'evidence' of the identity of the "hijackers"?

That's never-ending, but we have to stop somewhere!

9/11 could never have been carried out if the US wasn't already a Rothschildian 'democracy', in which the leadership of both incumbent and opposition parties are protégé-puppets of the same organ grinders, and the media is run by individuals whose priority is the defense and promotion of Zionism rather than the truth. However, elements of the Bush admin were complicit, particularly in the Pentagon attack, and the government was forced to cover for Israel's WTC attacks. Most politicians, journalists, and intelligence operatives are basically honest and well-meaning, but they're not allowed to do their jobs honestly and benevolently, because if they defy the few rotten apples at the top of the tree they would lose their jobs. They have to go along with the prevailing narrative, and there is little incentive for them to do anything else unless they plan and start to coordinate and execute their opposition to the same precision practised by Halevy, Netanyahu and top Mossad planners: "...careful planning, intelligence gathering, and a sophisticated choice of timing as well as near-perfect execution...".

Part of the Jewish Mafia's armory for distracting attention from their crimes is to play the "anti-Semitism" card. They will try to suggest that allegations of Israel and criminal Jews being behind 9/11 is an "ugly theory", or an "even uglier theory" than the allegation that Bush did it. However, the fact that the Jewish Mafia are responsible for 9/11 does not imply that ordinary Jews are responsible, any more than the false claim that the Arabs did 9/11 implies that all Arabs are responsible. Similarly, the fact that the Italian Mafia have been responsible for some crimes does not place responsibility for those crimes on all Italians.

Ordinary Jews have been deceived by their leaders just as much as any other group has been deceived by its leaders. Some Jews were tricked into joining the Mossad under the pretence that it was necessary to save Jews worldwide from 'evil' "anti-Semites" and "neo-Nazis" who were out to get them. No. Critics of Zionism and Israel oppose terrorism, murder, maiming and other criminality; they do not hate or dislike people based on race or religion. To like or hate people based on skin color, nose shape, personal beliefs, and religious worship that involves no harm to others is thoroughly irrational. But it is perfectly logical to dislike those who carry out bombings, murder or maiming of defenseless civilians, plots to smash planes into tall buildings, waging wars on a false prospectus, and so on. The real criminals are not those who were misled into playing a relatively minor role such as documenting the event or switching the fireproofing - most likely after being told that the buildings wouldn't collapse, but the event would be enough of a spectacle to get the US to join Israel's supposed war on terror, when of course those who were handling the field operatives knew full well that the buildings would collapse, because they'd already been planning it for years, they had blueprints for the buildings, and they'd done the calculations.

The real criminals are those who masterminded and orchestrated the 9/11 operation, and deceived most Jews and Gentiles alike. It would not be fair if the Jewish people in general were held responsible for the actions of a criminal group of elite Jews and officials of the State of Israel. But the Jewish people need to make one of two choices: (i) Continue supporting their leaders, who are criminals and terrorists, continue to isolate themselves from the rest of the world's more than seven billion population, and risk a terrible catastrophe for everyone. (ii) Break with the criminals and terrorists, unite with the rest of us, support peace, truth and justice, and help to create a better future for everyone.

Continue to Conclusion and Solution

Return to Volume Two: The "Holocaust"